Can somebody post this on Court TV message boards, for me?
This is quite entertaining. I am an Attorney who posted messages on Court TV message boards, to illustrate the preposterous nature of the case against Scott Peterson. I thought I'd take a break from trial preparation today, to post another, much needed message on some of the exceedingly misleading threads that Court TV promotes. One such thread relies extensively on the National Enquirer, and repeatedly makes statements like "the National Enquirer got that right too."
I discussed the preposterous nature of the National Enquirer's "evidence" by referring to this brilliant analysis about the value of the National Enquirer's "reporting".
My comments have been erased and replaced by linking directly to the garbage that the National Enquirer publishes. I tried to point out this ludicrous practice to Court TV message board posters, but I have evidently been banned. Quite strange, but not surprising, given the fact that it is not possible to accuse Scott of murder unless one is gullible enough to believe in the National Enquirer, and the person who controls Court TV message boards, does not tolerate anybody who ridicules the garbage that the National Enquirer promotes.
You have to have some seriously isolated braincells to keep promoting the National Enquirer and to censor this:
Also, the GLOBE claims Scott confessed to a fellow inmate. The tabloids are full of crap; they're commiting slander against Scott, along with the posters on Court TV. I have nothing against the channel, but the posters over there are all anti-everything-Peterson with evil thoughts and hearts.
I don't know if anyone can post this on the Court TV boards; the posters will react violently, almost, because they all but jump out from the computer screen and stone you for saying something along the lines even as innocent as, "Well, maybe Scott didn't do it?..." So, they're all one-sided with one track minds over there, just like the people who put Scottie where he is today. But good luck.
Re: Checked it out
On November 22, 2003, the Modesto Bee reported that it is unclear when Frey learned that the man she had been dating, Scott Peterson, was married and his pregnant wife missing since Christmas Eve.
What the hell is going on here? A man's wife is murdered and the useless media does not even know what the hell Amber knew and when she knew it. THIS STINKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mark Geragos is not going to take this BULLSHIT sitting down !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is Nancy Grace Crazy?
The case against Scott Peterson was delivered by God, to prove that any moron who accuses this man of murder, is the scum of the earth.
To accuse Scott Peterson of murder, one would have to believe that this young man, who produced a receipt to prove he had launched a boat that nobody had ever heard of before, deliberately set himself up to create suspicion. Murderers make excuses, they do not produce preposterous alibis, and the suggestion that Scott Peterson used a boat that nobody had ever heard of to dump his wife in the Bay is ultimately preposterous because under the circumstances, the "secret" is not Laci's lifeless body --the "secret" is the boat that nobody had ever heard of, and Scott Peterson never tried to hide this secret. Indeed, the smile on his face was broader than the horizon, not because he thought he was getting away with murder, but because he was playing with his new toy, and Scott Peterson's nightmare began, not when he was exposed trying to hide his secret boat, but when he frantically scoured the neighborhood, in search of his missing wife. In the final analysis, if one examines all the evidence, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that Laci Peterson was kidnapped, but in fairness, nobody has ever claimed that Peterson critics, Court TV blowhards Beth Karas and Nancy Grace, who repeatedly suggest that Scott Peterson is guilty, are anything more than ignorant, repugnant liars.
The fact that Nancy Grace and Beth Karas promote ignorant lies was conclusively exposed on January 14, 2004, when somebody placed a call on Larry King Live, to complain about Court TV message boards because they are heavily censored. The caller complained because messages that support Scott Peterson are routinely deleted, yet Beth Karas and Nancy Grace had the unmitigated gall to deny the indisputable fact that Court TV message boards are routinely censored. Clearly, we have investigated many of these recurring complaints about Court TV message boards ourselves, and if Beth Karas and Nancy Grace are too stupid to understand the merit of the complaint about Court TV message boards, they are inadvertent liars.
In a nutshell, anybody who slanders Scott Peterson is applauded on Court TV message boards, but anybody who defends Scott Peterson is banned. Despite this outrageous censorship, morons like Beth Karas and Nancy Grace claim that Court TV does not take a stand, where the guilt or innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned, and that is clearly an outright lie. The fact of the matter is, the claim that Scott Peterson murdered Laci cannot survive scrutiny, and that is why Court TV bans anybody who states the obvious. In the final analysis, it is not at all surprising because blowhards like Nancy Grace act like National Enquirer advocates, and this in not an isolated perversion of justice. Indeed, if Elizabeth Smart had been murdered, as Laci was, Nancy Grace would be applauding law enforcement for arresting Richard Albert Ricci whom she blamed for the abduction, and that would have provided the opportunity to murder Elizabeth Smart without the fear of ever being punished. Clearly, morons like Nancy Grace and Beth Karas aide and abet murderers when they accuse innocent people, and they should be prosecuted because they are ultimately responsible for the inexcusable failure to at least try to rescue Laci Peterson.
In the final analysis, critics like Beth Karas and Nancy Grace are stupid liars who should be prosecuted, for covering up the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson. These morons who pollute the airwaves with their moronic lies do not deserve a life, because Laci Peterson and Connor were pleading for theirs, when this poor, helpless, kidnapped woman was probably shot in the head, because the cowardly creeps who did this knew that they could get away with murder as long as they can rely upon morons like Nancy Grace and Beth Karas.
Some of the following messages that were posted on Court TV message boards were deleted because they do not support the preposterous claim that Scott Peterson murdered his wife.
Re: Is Nancy Grace Crazy?
Nancy Grace planted the idea that if Laci was recovered in tan pants, Scott Peterson murdered her on December 23rd. Only problem is, Vivian Mitchell and others saw Laci walking her dog, the next day.
686 Date: 2004-02-11 12:02:50
David Sween wrote:
The death of Vivian Mitchell is as eerie as locating the headless corpse of Laci Peterson and Scott's "pristine condition" son, to implicate an innocent man.
Vivian Mitchell was a key witness because, like Scott Peterson, she told the police that Laci was wearing black pants and a white top on Christmas Eve. If Scott was the murderer, the last thing he would do is lie about the clothes that Laci wore, when he killed her.
When you dig beneath the surface, the entire case against Scott Peterson has been about using the intelligence that only the murderers would know, to implicate Scott Peterson. As long as Vivian Mitchell was alive, she was in a position to clearly and convincingly expose the preposterous, prosecution suggestion that Scott Peterson is the murderer because he lied about what Laci was wearing, on the day she disappeared. Clearly, Scott Peterson did not tell Vivian Mitchell what to tell the police and that is what you call pure evidence. When Laci walked Mackenzie, on Christmas Eve, and I use the fact that Laci's own dog confirms the suggestion, to prove the point, she wore black pants and a white top, and this simple fact was widely reported in the media. Did anybody issue an "all points bulletin" to locate a missing woman in tan pants? Vivian Mitchell would have died laughing if that had happened.
Scott Peterson had no idea what Laci wore when she magically surfaced because he did not shoot his beautiful wife in the head. My ignorant critics say that if I am so smart, why don't I find Laci's head? The answer is simple. I am not responsible for the murder of Laci Peterson and I am not the one who is exploiting the knowledge that only the murderers would know. I merely point out the fact that Laci was probably dismembered before being dumped, probably to cover up the cause of death. All the preposterous, "magic head" theories that pundits routinely manufacture are so disgusting, that I have a panic attack, every time I hear a moron advance his so called, investigative skills, to suit the "revelations" that are published in the National Enquirer.
The people who are responsible for the murder of Laci Peterson are experts at exploiting their "intelligence" and the ignorance of all the pundits, but in the final analysis, they are directly responsible for proving that Scott Peterson is absolutely innocent. We are talking about innocent beyond the shadow of any doubt, because there is no greater difference between a "slam dunk" and this transparent scam which seeks to create the false appearance that Scott Peterson is guilty. There is no greater difference between Scott Peterson and the people who kidnapped his wife, on December 24, 2003. Vivian Mitchell may be dead, but her observations are as relevant as ever.
685 Date: 2004-02-10 23:36:57
CASE CLOSED ( no email / message.alturl.com) wrote:
684 Date: 2004-02-10 23:27:38
Pam Clark ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
I know this sounds gross, but I was reading another board which suggested that Laci was buried in a shallow grave and then dumped, to implicate Scott Peterson and the argument makes a lot of sense because the evidence indicates that Laci was probably dismembered prior to going into the water.
Isn't that why her head is missing? I am not one to believe preposterous theories -the head is not there...period, and that strongly suggests that the head is probably still in the shallow grave the body was initially dumped in. If that was not the case, the head would have turned up by now.
Like the rest of you, I also think that Vivian Mitchell and Laci's dog are currently the most reliable witnesses to the fact that Laci was alive and well, on December 24, 2003.
683 Date: 2004-02-10 12:21:19
To accuse Scott, you need... ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
--A hysterical police force that refuses to return the calls of intelligent, reliable eye witnesses like Vivian Mitchell
--A hysterical DA's Office that repeatedly leaks to the National Enquirer to demonize Scott
--A gullible public that tolerates this excessive abuse
--Hysterical, neo-Nazi eye witnesses who replace independent witnesses like Vivian Mitchell because they claim that Scott Peterson is guilty
--Hysterical demagogues like Nancy Grace, who falsely claim that eye witnesses like Vivian Mitchell coached Scott Peterson's dog, to create an alibi
--The bizarre, disgusting list goes on and on.
All you need to conclusively prove that Scott Peterson was absolutely shocked when his wife was kidnapped on Christmas Eve is the ability to view the evidence without distorting it
--it's called, simple, common sense.
682 Date: 2004-02-09 18:12:52
Richard Reed ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Mrs Mitchell was not alone. At least two other residents of the neighborhood where Laci Peterson lived also claim they saw her walking her dog between 9:45 and 10:30 a.m. on the day she vanished. These witnesses are extremely reliable and only a fool would challenge them because Laci Peterson's own dog confirmed their onservations. I agree with everybody who considers Vivian Mitchel's testimony to be conclusive.
681 Date: 2004-02-09 17:33:27
Lisa Kent ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Bill Mitchell defends the credibility of his wife. "I really think they had a theory, and facts that don't fit the theory sometimes don't impress others,'' Bill Mitchell, 84, said in a telephone interview from his Modesto home. "We're both long in years, but she was a good observer, and she was positive up to last Sunday when she could still talk."
Vivian Mitchell's account would have corroborated Scott Peterson's account of what happened Christmas Eve morning. Geragos has suggested that Laci Peterson was abducted by two men while walking her dog in a nearby park.
Bill Mitchell said that although he and his wife met several times with Geragos and his legal team, no formal deposition was ever taken. Without it, her account would be considered hearsay and would never make it to Peterson's trial.
Robert Talbott, a law professor at the University of San Francisco, says Vivian Mitchell's testimony could have been damning for the prosecution's case, which appears to be overwhelmingly circumstantial so far.
"If the jury would have found her credible, it would have meant big problems for the prosecution," Talbott said. "It would have thrown their whole timeline off."
God Bless Vivian Mitchell, she was a very credible witness to the fact that Laci Peterson was kidnapped.
680 Date: 2004-02-08 02:08:10
Jordan McQueen ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Vivian Mitchell was not an old fogey. It's too bad she is being treated like one -guess they have to do it now, to justify her death.
679 Date: 2004-02-08 01:46:35
This was posted, March 2, 2003 ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Has it been pointed out that the Bill and Vivian Mitchell live next to the same river bed park system as the Peterson's? I'm very curious if these three parks have a trail meandering throughout?
Mrs. Mitchell said she thought Laci was heading for Kewin Park. Kewin Park is also a part of the very same river bed park system as the La Loma Park next to the Petersons. Apparently these parks adjoin...Kewin being to the SW of La Loma.
Could Laci have been either entering (or exiting)the park in the area of the Mitchell home?
Of course the MPD doesn't want the Mitchell's statement. Their entire focus since day ONE evaporates along with their *93* sacks of "evidence" in the event that the sighting of Laci after 10 a.m. that morning is verified.
===========================
Take a peek: Very interesting. recall the Peterson address is: 523 Covena Avenue, Modesto
William and Vivian Mitchell 231 Buena Vista Drive, Modesto
The Mitchells house has the star. The Peterson house is located at the upper right of the map (click on the arrow on the upper right side) The streets that follow the southern perimeter of this park run directly from the Peterson's to the Mitchell's. (The Peterson's resident is just around the corner from Edgebrook Dr., on Covena.)
No wonder the Modesto resident in this group who appears as a MPD mouthpiece wants to discount and disparage the Mitchell's as senile old fogey's. ..and the MPD doesn't want to hear anything about it.
It's obvious when you look at the map.
***You're right. The map certainly makes it look like the Mitchell house would be right along a likely dog walking route from the Peterson's. Interesting.
678 Date: 2004-02-07 15:08:23
Brian Walt ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
If the DA's Office uses emotional nutcases like Nancy Grace to discredit Vivian Mitchell, it raises serious suspicions.
Who else did they use?
I think it is very serious when a witness who proves that a defendant is innocent, is found dead. It's like the death of reason -to be replaced by the insanity that Nancy Grace promotes.
Re: Is Nancy Grace Crazy?
You are all looney tunes! Mitchell's house is in the opposite direction from the park where Laci walked her dog. Also Vivian saw Laci AND the dog AFTER the dog was returned to the yard. Explain that one away
Re: Is Nancy Grace Crazy?
[quote]You are all looney tunes! Mitchell's house is in the opposite direction from the park where Laci walked her dog. Also Vivian saw Laci AND the dog AFTER the dog was returned to the yard. Explain that one away [/quote]
Because your a close minded idiot who refuses to believe that KS's time line was way off. Your ignorance is showing its ugly head. You obviously didn't read the transcripts, or read up where the scent dogs located Laci's scent and where they were led. You also missed where those searches were called off when the dogs didn't go in the direction the MPD liked.
Now, you three or four people you have on your SPIG board should learn how to read and comprehend what you are reading when you finally do read the transcripts.
Why is it the four of you have to have sooooo many nic's? Oh wait, I know why lmao. You four want people to believe that there more G's than there are NG's. I believe there are many more NG's than there are G's. Why don't you grow up and stick with only one nic on your board as well as the other's that you and three groupie friends join. Seem's to me you are obsessed with the NG's. You are sick. Very, very sick.
Agreed!
The tabloids are full of crap; they're commiting slander against Scott, along with the posters on Court TV. I have nothing against the channel, but the posters over there are all anti-everything-Peterson with evil thoughts and hearts. 
But good luck. 
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies