Can you trust DA's who are certified liars?
The hallmark of the DA's who are prosecuting Jackson and Scott Peterson is that they are proven liars. Tom Sneddon, in his very first press conference said that he would not do interviews and that he would not leak and he has don nothing but. The DA in the Scott Peterson case is equally outrageous. Where did these jokers come from?
________________________________________
437 Date: 2003-05-30 14:45:06
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
In a statement, District Attorney James Brazelton said "evidence in this case should be presented in court through the testimony of witnesses and not selectively leaked to the news media by unknown persons whom the press will not identify."
what is Brazelton talking about? We are clearly aware of the fact that the Prosecution routinely leaks information to Dan Abrams, there is no need for the press to identify anything -we understand !
436 Date: 2003-05-30 14:36:56
Cyndi Smith ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"Since the autopsy results have been sealed by court order, the District Attorney's Office cannot verify the accuracy of any media statements concerning the contents of the autopsy reports without violating the court's order," Brazelton said in a statement.
Isn't it too late to worry about violating court orders?
435 Date: 2003-05-30 09:21:03
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The Prosecution leaked autopsy records to divert attention away from the claim that Laci's captor probably shot her in the head. Gunfire is the leading cause of homicide in the United States and that has evidently escaped the notice of everybody
except the Prosecution and N.R.A. activists.
The Prosecution routinely leaks to counter the truth with an alternative delusion. When the media widely promoted Mrs. Mitchell's story about having spotted Laci walking her dog on Christmas Eve, the police tried to replace the significance of her claim through reports about unconfirmed [code word for sneaky leak], "cement powder" in Scott's boat. Scott's boat had been in police custody for 60 days when reports about unconfirmed traces of cement powder became a media event of the sort that you would expect to find in the National Enquirer. The implication of these unconfirmed reports was widely discussed in the media by advocates like Marc Klass and Nancy Grace, and before long, the claim that Scott Peterson had anchored his wife to the bottom of the sea, became the case for the Prosecution.
The latest, autopsy leak is merely more of the same. The prosecution has replaced the claim that Laci was probably shot in the head with a shoddy autopsy report.
In my opinion, this latest leak is a firm confirmation of the fact that the Prosecution is not planning to produce Laci's skull as evidence, to prove that Scott Peterson murdered Laci.
This is a significant development because it proves that the Prosecution is not looking for evidence to solve the mystery behind Laci's murder. In other words, if the Prosecution was looking for evidence, it would be looking for Laci's skull. It would not be looking for yet another way to leak prejudicial evidence to implicate Scott.
434 Date: 2003-05-30 04:56:26
Tom Wilkinson ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Nancy Grace says that the defense is obviously the source of autopsy leaks. And then, Nancy says "who cares who leaked the report Larry?" In other words, if Mark Geragos had leaked anything, he would have been wearing Susan McDougal's orange jumpsuit, yesterday. Even the Judge is complicit in this one, because the report that he wants to gag Mark Geragos after the prosecution has spent 4 months leaking is preposterous.
In the final analysis, it is not possible to suggest that the prosecution is not directly responsible for this routine leak?
433 Date: 2003-05-30 03:06:45
Traci Sears ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," wrote Deputy Stanislaus County District Attorney David Harris. "By releasing the autopsy reports the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are and then accurate information may be reported to mitigate recent adverse publicity."
How are leaks from the prosecutor's office skewed in favor of the defense?
432 Date: 2003-05-30 02:58:47
Jane Dawson ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The DA's Office is OUT OF CONTROL.
"In direct response to this latest development, however, the District Attorney's Office will be filing a motion to withdraw their opposition to the sealing of the autopsy reports."
431 Date: 2003-05-29 21:03:41
ha ha ha ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The prosecution says that it wants to publicize the autopsy reports now. What an about face !
Boy do they monitor this website closely, don't they?
The prosecution is just trying to cover tail, because they have been leaking connor's autopsy report.
The Prosecution is guilty of contempt of court. CHARGE THE BASTARDS ! ! !
And so, the next time you hear a rumor about the murder of Laci Peterson, it is time to ask the question, "Who is leaking the information and why?" The question is rather elusive because it is always the source of the leak which demands exceptional scrutiny, and the growing tendency to leave the name out reflects the loosening of journalistic standards.
The news is not necessarily reliable. The news is merely a vehicle of dissemination -an object of publicity. It is always the source which reflects reliability or bias, and it is the credibility of the information which defines the standard that we call the news. Unfortunately, that standard has steadily declined since Dick Morris claimed that Matt Drudge is the "Woodward and Bernstein" of the Lewinsky investigation, and it is on the critical care list now that the National Enquirer is threatening to pick up where Matt Drudge left off. Hasn't anyody else wondered about the fact that Matt Drudge is not covering the Laci Peterson investigation? The leak has been re-directed, is everybody sleep-walking in broad daylight? Let me say it one more time, because the delusional, National Enquirer is on a mission to be the voice that Matt Drudge failed to become. Scott Peterson did not murder Laci.
Authorities sealed the results of a May 15, 2003 autopsy report, probably because it might be used to implicate a man with a ruddy complexion, spotted by an entirely reasonable clerk in Longview, Washington. People who are very hostile about honest witnesses who admit to having made a mistake, fail to appreciate their integrity. And even if the clerk did everything right, it wouldn't have made any difference, because the National Enquirer claims that every single person who spotted Laci alive, on Christmas Eve, is wrong. What a massive conspiracy it would be, to leap to the conclusion that Scott Peterson even trained Laci's dog, to create the false impression that he was an innocent man.
This case is not about the People of the State of California versus Scott Peterson. This case is an Inquisition that parallels the tactics and the resources that were used in effort to destroy Julie Hiatt Steele, and the Judge who believes that he can obscure the fact by gagging Mark Geragos is ABSOLUTELY DELUSIONAL.
Media lawyer, Charity Kenyon, has clearly indicated that the records of Laci's autopsy "are presumptively open to the public" and any judge who rules otherwise is obstructing the opportunity to determine the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson.
429 Date: 2003-05-28 12:51:24
Post Script ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
P.S. I remember when the police confiscated Peterson's new truck, Mark Fuhrman said that the police would find all the forensic evidence they needed to convict Scott, in his new truck.
How did Mark Fuhrman know that it was possible to plant forensic evidence in Scott's new truck? Needless to say, when the murderers planted the bodies, they removed all doubt about their willingness to do anything, but where did Mark Fuhrman get his advance knowledge?
It sounds like the murderers were planning to plant Laci's body in Scott's new truck, to provide a trail of forensic evidence, but they got cold feet. They should have taken the opportunity to do that, because the suggestion that the fetus
survives the sea but the head does not, is even dumber than planting Laci's body in Scott's new truck. If they planted forensic evidence in Scott's new truck, at least nobody would know that the kidnappers had to remove Laci's head, to hide the bullet wound. After all, the police were planning to convict Scott without the body. Can anybody see Mark Fuhrman saying. "I told you so, I told you so ! ! !"
"I know who did it" is the most incriminating thing that Scott Peterson said, in at least 69 phonecalls. The police do not save exculptory evidence. They just save what they consider to be incriminating evidence, and the private claim "I know who did it" is the least incriminating imaginable. Of course Scott knows who did it! As long as he is not eliminated as a suspect, he knows much more than anybody else does.
Nancy Grace has publicly been saying "I know who did it" for the past 4 months now. She has been saying"I know who did it" while Laci, was in the hands of a brutal kidnapper, in Longview Washington. Frightened and disturbed by the fact that the police were not looking for her alive, Laci struggled to outwit him by saying, "oh don't worry about it, my husband always kidnaps me for dinner. Don't get this madman angry, little foolish clerk, he has a gun and he has threatened to shoot me in the head, if he learns about what I told you."
Nancy Grace and the police have been saying, "I know who did it" when the police arranged the Amber Frey press conference to isolate and demonize Scott Peterson.
The police have repeatedly said "I know who did it" and indicated that Scott Peterson murdered his wife on December 23, 2002, even though Laci Peterson was repeatedly spotted waliking her dog, on December 24, 2002.
The police and Nancy Grace provided comfort to the kidnappers, because as long as they repeatedly said "I know who did it" the kidnappers had no reason not to put a bullet through Laci's head because they knew they could get away with murder.
"I know who did it too." Indeed, anybody who has looked at the way this mess has unfolded clearly understands the indisputable, undeniable fact that it was anybody but Scott Peterson. Oh, I forgot, the police erased all the exculpatory evidence because they think they can get away with framing Scott Peterson. Too late !
The kidnappers have been saying "we did it" ever since they chopped Laci's head off, to cover her bullet wound.
The prosecution has been saying "we know who did it" ever since they have been keeping the autopsy evidence a secret, to provide the opportunity to shred the report and replace it with something that is less exculpatory. The autopsy proves that Laci was alive when the kidnapper held a gun to her head, in Longview, Washington. "I know who did it." It was the very same people who murdered Chandra Levy and returned her body, when it was forensically useless. Same M.O., same murderers.
If the police want an incriminating statement, they had better tell that unamed stripper [Ted Rowlands has an orgasm every time he talks about her] that Scott Peterson dyed his hair in the swimming pool so that he can ask her to drive him to Mexico. I'm sure the police have forgotten but this stripper also told the police that Scott Peterson has confessed to murder. Don't expect it to come out now, they're expecting it to come out at the prelim, when the stripper is high on heroine, just like Gregory Coleman was, before he overdosed, after saying that Michael Skakel confessed to him. Corrupt cops are predictable, aren't they? No doubt, the same crackpots who framed Michael Skakel are working this one behind-the-scenes. Talk to Mark Fuhrman. He understands. But unlike the Skakel fiasco, Mark Fuhrman IS NOT going to claim ANY credit for this one. Even Mark Fuhrman IS NOT THAT STUPID !
The police are not even releasing the full autopsy results, because Laci evidently carried a baby to it's almost full term, and that means that she was alive long after the police claim that Scott murdered her.
The PROSECUTION IS VERY, VERY SICK IN THIS CASE ! ! !
How many murderers go free because the wrong person is convicted?
425 Date: 2003-05-24 22:33:33
This is certainly a CREEPY CULT ! ! ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Amber Frey is the victim of the people who hired her to "service" Scott and now she is stuck in the middle of a very tragic and potentially dangerous situation.
Gloria Allred has been hired to muzzle Amber because if the truth comes out, the people who are trying to frame Scott will be arrested. How many escorts do you know who pose for family pictures, unless these pictures are supposed to be used to blackmail the client?
Amber Frey needas a lawyer to protect her because without a lawyer, she will probably become another Gregory Coleman, whose convenient cocaine overdose denied the opportunity to bring out the truth -the poor man's version of hiring an expensive creepy lawyer like Gloria Allred, to muzzle a witness, and to angrily point the finger at an absolutely innocent man like Scott Peterson.
To be sure, if you are an ABSOLUTE MORON, who believes that Scott Peterson murdered his wife the day before all the neighhbors saw Laci walking her dog, God Bless You.
But hiring a hooker to replace Laci Peterson is as vulgar as returning the bodies without the head, to cover up the fact that Laci's captor shot her in the head.
Amber Frey is an escort, if she wasn't charged with solicitation, she should have been. The only question was, who was paying her and possibly Bill Garcia, to service Scott? People are supposed to call escorts but in this case, the escort called Scott the day before his wife was murdered. No wonder they need lawyers to muzzle her. If Amber Frey opens her mouth, she's a dead duck.
Every woman who is used for the sake of demonizing somebody's character, to falsely implicate him in a high crime, is muzzled by a lawyer and given a makeover. In this case, they are trying to make it appear as if the slut is good enough to kill for. A makeover didn't do anything for Linda Tripp's credibility and it certainly will not do anything for Amber's. Imagine hiring Bill Garcia to find out if Scott is married. This Bimbo thinks that blackmail and murder is some kind of a makeover game. One thing is for sure, at this point in time, she needs a lawyer, but so do the cops who cooperated with her.
Hiring somebody like Gloria Allred, a Los Angeles victims' rights attorney, has all the earmarks of the Skakel persecution, where a repugnant murderer like Ken Littleton, the unstable tutor who was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel, was made to look like the victim, while a skinny little kid who was only 15 years old when "the victim" murdered Martha Moxley, was made to look like a brutal killer.
It's not going to work with Scott, the victim was his wife and if the slut does not tell the truth, she is an accomplice to murder. Ken Littleton got away with it, but that's because the prosecutor caught Mickey Sherman with his pants down and unindicted felons like Ken Littleton are granted immunity. Does Amber think that Gloria Allred can grant her immunity from prosecution?
How many lawyers is it going to take, to cover up the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson?
Amber's testimony: "Judge, I escort men to bed for a living and I expect them all to tell me the truth because then I can threaten to tell their wives on them. Judge, I know I am as credible as an escort who pretends that she doesn't know that the men she screws are pretending to be single." Please try not to laugh, it doesn't get any better than this -clearly another production by the people who framed Skakel, who tried to frame Gary Condit until Dunne was sued and who now think that Scott Peterson is an easy target. This is certainly a malignant cult, if that's what you want to call it.
FRIENDS - Think you will enjoy the first 3 chapters of my upcoming book, I LEAP OVER THEIR HEADS!, regarding General Electric (GE) and their reprehensible behavior. You can read them by going to www.edwardbaskett.com. The music is beautiful, too.
423 Date: 2003-05-20 15:39:06
Barb Douglas ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Every woman who is used for the sake of demonizing somebody's character, to falsely implicate him in a high crime, is muzzled by a lawyer and given a makeover. In this case, they are trying to make it appear as if the slut is good enough to kill for. A makeover didn't do anything for Linda Tripp's credibility and it certainly will not do anything for Amber's. Imagine hiring Bill Garcia to find out if Scott is married. This Bimbo thinks that blackmail and murder is some kind of a makeover game. One thing is for sure, at this point in time, she needs a lawyer, but so do the cops who cooperated with her.
I HATE CREEPY LAWYERS. Remember when Mark Geragos defended Julie Hiatt Steele and Ken Starr wanted to send her to jail for life, simply because she had the courage to tell the truth. CREEPY LAWYERS TERRORIZE innocent people and they use CREEPY JOURNALISTS like MICHAE ISIKOFF in effort to destroy them. CREEPY PROSECUTORS who obviously think that they are SPECIAL, are cuurently using CREEPY LIARS like Ted Rowlands, in effort to fraudulently destroy Scott Peterson.
Ted Rowlands claims that Scott Peterson has NEVER cooperated with the Police, but up until Chief Wasden called Scott a MURDER SUSPECT because nobody claimed the reward money [so he changed the status -he offered $50,000 for body parts] the police always claimed that Scott Peterson was cooperative [although he wasn't fully cooperative because he couldn't tell them where Laci was, duh -even if he knew, which he clearly did not, he had the right to avoid self-incrimination, so why the hell did the police excpect him to tell them where Laci was, without befriending him first?]
Ted Rowlands now claims that Scott Peterson NEVER COOPERATED with the police, and the American public is now supposed to be informed by liars like Ted Rowlands?
421 Date: 2003-05-10 00:47:25
Anothe transparent, miscarriage of justice ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Hitler would be proud of the DA Brazelton. He doesn't have enough evidence to survive a preliminary hearing, so he is going to use the Grand Jury, to Frey Scott !
Shame on Hitler !
At the end of a hearing in which Stanislaus County Superior Court Judge Al Girolami ordered the arrest and search warrants to remain sealed, Geragos stood and asked the judge to also rule that the Modesto County District Attorney's Office not be allowed to convene a grand jury in the case. Instead, Geragos wants a more public preliminary hearing. The judge refused to grant Geragos' simple, reasonable request.
420 Date: 2003-05-08 18:33:10
lawyers4justice ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
I read this message on the Court TV message boards and nobody rushed to defend the police. It's unusual for court tv posters not to rush to the aid of the Modesto Police Department when they are criticized. I guess it is not possible to defend them in this situation.
This case reminds me of the Chandra Levy disappearance, when attorney Billy Martin called it the work of professionals before Levy's body was mysteriously returned. When the body was returned, the "status" of the search suddenly changed and Investigators in the Chandra Levy homicide case began to look into the possibility that she was killed by a sexual predator in Rock Creek Park and they focused on a few dozen sex offenders, including some in prison.
Is there a pattern here? When the heat is on, change the focus?
That is what appears to be happening in the Peterson case, Somebody made it awfully difficult not to arrest Scott Peterson -only problem is, Scott Peterson did not murder Laci.
419 Date: 2003-05-08 17:40:21
Why didn't the police look for Laci Peterson? ( curiousgeorge2@email.com / no homepage) wrote:
Why did the police refuse to search for Laci Peterson?
Professional killers rely on the ability to destroy forensic evidence. They evidently determined that the best way to do that was to drive Laci as far away as possible and they had nothing to fear because the police were not looking for Laci. The fact that she was ever spotted is consequently a miracle.
When professional killers are involved; a/manner of death is carefully concealed, b/time of death is concealed and the body is manipulated in a manner that guarantees a and b.
Vivian Mitchell swears she saw Laci pass by her kitchen window, shortly after 10 a.m. the day Laci disappeared. According to Mrs. Mitchell, "That was the lady I saw. And she is so striking. beautiful Lady and a Beautiful Dog." There is one and only one Beautiful Lady like Laci Peterson. People are attracted to beautiful things and in the words of Mrs. Mitchell, "she was so pretty, that you couldn't help but look."
Homer Moldanado also saw Laci as he was driving to work that morning. In his own words, "I noticed a young, pregnant woman and she was having a little trouble with the dog." I believe that was Laci Peterson cause she was wearing white shirt, black pants and she was very pregnant."
The first thing that competent investigators do when a person goes missing is to identify the clothing of the person that everybody should be looking for.
Did that happen yet?
Scott Peterson did not murder Laci Peterson. If he did, the single bullet theory is undeniable. Consider the Scott Peterson trajectory. He told his dog to go home without its leash, just when he was on his way to the marina with a dead pregnant woman, the head removed to cover up the cause of death, just before he casually hauled Laci Peterson, embedded in a chung of cement to keep her under water for about 4 months, Peterson dumped the dead weight into the water without being noticed [even though he was witnessed smiling in his boat] and the victims miraculously surfaced, just when the desperate, Modesto Police force, frustrated by the fact that 24-hour surveillance had failed to produce a reason to arrest Scott Peterson, needed the appearance of a "slam dunk," to divert attention away from the failure to make a case. The fact that Scott Peterson also hired a Laci-lookalike, to pass by Mrs. Mitchell's window, the day after Scott murdered his wife, was merely another example of paying attention to the fine detail which guarantees Scott Peterson's ability to get away with anything. Needless to say, if Scott Peterson is successfully prosecuted, it is possible to prosecute anybody for anything.
Modesto and Berkeley police went to a marina on San Francisco Bay to investigate Peterson's claim that he was fishing at the time his wife disappeared. No details were available about what detectives might have found out.
"At this point, he is not a suspect," Detective Doug Ridenour said. Police said they had no evidence of foul play in the disappearance.
Despite the fact that the police verified Scott Peterson's honesty because he was spotted at the Marina, they did not disclose the obvious and instead, they provided the opportunity for the media to demonoize Scott Peterson by repeatedly claiming that Scott Peterson was lying when he said that he went fishing.
This bias is too extreme and too hostile to justify, and the hypocricy it has uncovered has absolutely destroyed police credibility. The current suggestion that Scott Peterson is guilty of murdering his wife because he is telling the truth about what he did no December 24 is too bizarre to take seriously. Scott Peterson was spotted on his boat, struggling to familiarize himself with the gadgets of his new toy. He was not hauling his dead wife's body over his shoulder, and try as they may, to discredit Ms. Mitchell, who spotted Laci walking her dog a full 45 minutes after Scott left to go fishing, the fact that the police did not even bother to contact Ms. Mitchell speaks volumes about the validity of the police campaign to demonize Scott Peterson.
To be fair, if the police wish to use Scott Peterson's alibi against him, they should have accepted it in the first place. Police Hypocricy reflects Police State Tactics and they will NEVER prevail.
417 Date: 2003-05-02 19:15:34
Amber Frey and Chandra Levy ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Amber Frey is just like Chandra Levy. If she did not privately kiss and publicly tell, as orchestrated, her body would have been eventually recovered from Rock Creek park, just like Chandra Levy's was:
Do not blame Amber Frey for this charade, she is just a disposable pawn, she has the right to survive, and she has had a glimpse of what it takes, to demonize a target like Scott Peterson. She does not want to be a target herself.
The people who are responsible for kidnapping Laci Peterson assume that their trail has been covered, because they use demagogues like Nancy Grace to ridicule the suggestion that anybody would ever kidnap Laci Peterson. Moreover, they flood the Internet with messages that are designed to ridicule the simple fact that Laci Peterson was kidnapped while she was walking her dog.
Cover up artists commonly exploit ignorance and they rely on statements like "..why would ANYONE (other than Scott) want to harm Laci?"
"Why would anybody want to kidnap Elian Gonzalez?" -Duh, there are some pretty sick puppies in this world and Scott Peterson IS NOT, one of them.
Regardless, people like Nancy Grace are like dogs with Richard Ricci's bones, and these demagogues will continue to say things like: "But why would someone want to frame such a wonderful perfect person..." Demagogues like Nancy Grace routinely frame innocent people because they manufacture fiction to cover up their own ignorance. They exploit the families of murder victims by creating the false impression that they are in fact pursueing criminals, but when they target the wrong person they merely give real murderers the cover they require to pervert the course of justice.
Their mantra is ultimately nauseating: "You would have to believe a 30-year-old fertilizer salesman had made an enemy big enough to go through this much trouble to 'frame' him for his wife's murder." You do not have to believe anything, the facts speak for themselves. There is not a single shred of credible evidence to implicate Scott Peterson in the murder of his wife, yet Scott Peterson has been arrested. Scott Peterson was clearly framed and the ignorance that demagogues like Nancy Grace exploit, create the false impression that the arrest of Scott Peterson is the product of a competent investigation. IT IS CLEARLY ANYTHING BUT...
The suggestion that politically motivated fanatics do not target "NOBODYS" is absolutely preposterous.
Elian Gonzalez was also a nobody, he was kidnapped for political reasons and if John Ashcroft was the Attorney General, Elian Gonzalez would have NEVER been rescued: He would still be a political prisoner, just like Scott Peterson is today. Clearly, there is no basis, absolutely no basis in law, to hold a man who is obviously the target of an aggressive, persistent Inquisition.
Fanatics never fail to exploit NOBODYS like Scott Peterson, for their own, sleazy political purposes.
__________________________
[Debate]But I think that I disagree with you when you say that Amber is not being used to implicate Scott.
She is supposed to be the "motivation", remember?
I'd like to know when she became the "motivation" was it before or after Laci Peterson was murdered?
------------------
You're right, that is their motivation, thank you. I guess that answers somewhat the question about why they didn't "seclude" her before and why they had her give a press conference.
______________________________________________
A body that would have washed ashore immediately would have yielded excellent DNA. If someone did take Laci, THEIR DNA would have been all over her, as well as cause of death. The sea was the perfect asthetic cleanser to wash away incriminating evidence over time, plus the killer would have the added benefit of taking the focus off of them and shifting it to Scott. Scott's alibi was out in the media on day ONE when he first reported her missing, so it was well-known by the public.
_____________________________________________
I have a problem with the logistics concerning those bodies washing up. For one thing, consider the vast amount of space in that ocean. It's HUGE, with under currents and forever changing tides. Is it also coincidence that those bodies washed up within ONE DAY of one another? Neither body floated at an extremely different pace, nor did one body become lodged on anything underwater to restrict its movement. The chances of that are beyond comprehension - and that includes any 'spiritual' theory. The second thing is the location of both bodies in relation to one another. Again, beyond logistics that they would wash up within such a close proximity to one another. The ocean is HUGE, as of course, are the shorelines. Not to mention the black tarp that conveniently washed up, the next day...
____________________________________________
Conclusion: The real murderers had Laci wrapped in that black tarp in the bottom of the sea, and removed the weights, to force the police to arrest Scott Peterson. Alternative theory: GOD wanted to punish Scott Peterson. National Enquirer theory: Scott Peterson bludgeoned Laci to death in his home on December 23rd, had Laci over his shoulder while he received his receipt from the marina, mixed some concrete, placed Laci's feet in it, wrapped her up in a tarp and threw her overboard. Try accepting those logistics...wow ! Who needs forensic scientists, as long as we have the National Enquirer?
416 Date: 2003-05-01 20:44:55
Laci Peterson was PROBABLY shot in the head. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
I was banned from posting on Court TV message boards because I suggested that Laci Peterson was probably shot in the head by the man who kidnapped her. My reasoning was that it would have been far easier to find Laci's body with skull intact, in San Fransisco Bay than a fetus, and the body of evidence strongly suggests that the remains of Laci and Connor were recovered in a manner that was deliberately supposed to conceal the cause of death.
I believe that if Scott Peterson had dumped his wife in San Fransisco Bay, Laci's head would have been recovered and the fetus would have perished. All the theoretical crap about coffin birth is pure speculation and based on the foolish
assumptions that the National Enquirer and the people who vilify Scott Peterson, aggressively promote. I strongly resent and reject this preposterous effort to create the impression that there is absolutely no difference between fact and the fiction that false assumptions produce.
I am not allowed to post on Court TV unless I promote the incriminating fiction that has become a course of the daily diet that is aggressively promoted. In particular, I am supposed to believe that Scott Peterson placed his wifes feet in cement and dumped her in the San Fransisco Bay. If that is the case, why wasn't Laci's head recovered? Demagogues like Nancy Grace currently claim that the police might fail to prosecute Scott Peterson if they fail to locate cement anchors. Why is she encouraging the police to look for cement anchors? Why doesn't she encourage the police to look for Laci's head?
I strongly believe, given the way this media circus has unfolded, that as desperate as the murderers are, to implicate Scott, Peterson, they removed the head from the body because a bullet hole would expose the cause of death. I strongly believe that if Scott Peterson was the one who dumped Laci's body in San Fransisco Bay, Laci's head would have been recovered and the fetus, which has survived by way of theoretical speculation that makes the National Enquirer appear to be a credible source, would not exist.
Moreover, if any or all of the witnesses who spotted Laci Peterson while Scott was fishing, are as credible as they appear to be, the theory that Laci Peterson was shot in the head, is much more than mere speculation. Firearms are responsible for most homicides and the claim that Laci Peterson was probably shot in the head, is far more likely than not.
415 Date: 2003-04-25 04:10:13
Scott Peterson is clearly innocent. ( no email / framedma.tripod.com/24.htm) wrote:
ABC NEWS
Now Kristen, whose due date was a few weeks ahead of Laci's, is the mother of a son named Connor, the same name Laci had chosen for her unborn son.
The Reeds say they're not sure what to think of Scott Peterson's arrest last week. Greg Reed said he last spoke to Scott on Christmas Eve, hours before Laci was reported missing. Reed said Scott called him from his cell phone to firm up New Year's Eve plans they had.
"On the afternoon he called from his mobile phone to mine, and we had spoke probably once or twice a week, so it wasn't a phone call that I would see as unordinary. He sounded chipper and looking forward to getting together," Reed said.
Reed said Scott never mentioned that he had been fishing that day, but he said he didn't find it unusual since it was a short conversation.
Later that day, the Reeds heard from Scott again, but his demeanor had changed. "It went from a wonderful celebration of Christmas to a frantic voice mail message from Scott that evening looking for Laci, wondering if I had talked to her that morning," Kristen said.
Does the prosecutor understand the significance of the ABC news report which substantiates the claim that Scott Peterson has absolutely no idea what happened to his wife Laci?
The prosecutor says they have not collected all the evidence that is required to support the theory that Laci Peterson died in her own home. Tell us something we do not know. We clearly understand the fact that if it was legitimately plausible to justify Scott Peterson's arrest, it would have occurred months ago.
So the ONLY gameplan of the prosecution is to hound Scott Peterson until he drops dead, just like Richard Ricci did.
Welcome to Nazi Germany.
How do they get away with this? They get away with this by spending more time trying to keep details of the so called "evidence" authorities gathered from the couple's home, Scott Peterson's truck and boat, and a storage locker, a secret.
Indeed, they had to go to court to convince a judge, that it was necessary to maintain the secrecy of evidence which had been illegally sealed. The decision was very controversial but not surprising because the bias of the prosecution is difficult to override.
And how do they plan to continue to hide the fact that there is no evidence, absolutely NO EVIDENCE which even remotely suggests the right to detain Scott Peterson?
Details of what evidence authorities have gathered from the couple's home, Scott Peterson's truck and boat, and a storage locker are in court documents that have been sealed by court order, to create the false impression that evidence exists.
And now, the prosecution continues to cover up the fact that there is NO EVIDENCE to implicate Scott Peterson in any crime.
Since there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE to justify arresting Scott Peterson, the police know they would have to lie through their teeth to survive a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence for a trial, and Brazelton cannot possibly maintain this charade unless he uses the secrecy of Grand jury proceedings, to avoid the principles of justice that we all take for granted.
Why are the Police afraid of a preliminary hearing, are they afraid that Scott Peterson is going to escape? It would be appropriate to call these clowns Keystone Cops if they did not act like Nazis who destroy real people and real lives who deserve justice and freedom.
[Since this was written, Brazelton has done his flip flop and he now claims that the preliminary hearing will be held in July, but nothing has changed. There is still NO EVIDENCE which even remotely suggests that Scott Peterson murdered his wife. These revisions that the authorities routinely produce to create the false impression that they have been fair in this case, are absolutely predictable. District Attorney James Brazelton is now saying that he hopes for a July preliminary hearing to present evidence necessary to take Peterson to trial, but conceded it could take up to 2 years before a trial begins. To be sure, if the Mitchels are dead in 2 years, it will be much easier for the Modesto Police Department to promote the National Enquirer's version of events. Two years will also give the authorities the opportunity to deal with Scott Peterson the way they dealt with Richard Ricci -but this time they have no excuse because Laci is no longer missing and there is no legitimate cause to extend the torture of Scott Peterson.]
The Police are still so absolutely desperate to implicate Scott Peterson they have made the claim that they have found tide and current information on his computer, a national obsession. Mark Geragos called this so called evidence "devastating" because he has obviously been convinced "the police went out and did some sonar of that area and that they had actually spotted something that they thought in the area appeared to be a body..." Geragos has bought the CREEPY GOSSIP, hook line and sinker, but even a seasoned INQUISITOR like Nancy Grace, the MORON who called Richard Ricci a murderer, understands the fact that the evidence on Scott's computer proves that he was planning to go fishing.
The absolute obsession to destroy Scott Peterson's legitimate alibi has produced a perpetual fishing expedition which has indefinetely postponed justice, and the Nazis who are tolerating this fraud deserve nothing less than the DEATH PENALTY. Nazi spokesperson, Ted Rowlands, has hinted that there is more evidence to come, and that can certainly surface as easily as Connor did, but at this point, it is not possible to frame an innocent person more than once -it doesn't make any difference what they come up with now. Clearly, the evidence they are now "looking for" is linked to the cement theories that Ava Frey cultivated while she was dancing in Bill Garcia's lap in the middle of San Fransisco Bay, and they are obviously working overtime on this one because the well publicized, cement block with the tire mark through it, obviously failed to cement the case against Peterson. But at this point, the "search" for "evidence" is exhaustively obscene because it merely proves that Scott Peterson's arrest is based, not on the substance of the evidence against him, but upon the perpetual, predictable obsession to revise the "evidence" until it conveniently embraces the bizarre theories that demagogues like Nancy Grace and sources like the National Enquirer promote. Needless to say, this revision betrays the fact that Scott Peterson is being framed, and at this point in time, the fact is too obvious to dispute.
If it was even remotely plausible to suggest that this Inquisition is anything less than what one would expect from Nazi Germany, you can denounce the extreme language but if you want to remove all doubt about the parallel, talk to Laci, talk to Conner, talk to Scott's mother... Talk to Laci's mother, as long as you understand the fact that she has merely become one of thousands and thousands of jury members who are successfully manipulated by those who routinely convict innocent people. If the rage of Laci's mother does not convince you that the Nazis have arrived, nothing ever will.
Half of the men facing execution in Illinois were found to be innocent by DNA forensic science, and now, the Nazis who are trying to proclaim a death sentence on Scott Peterson, are looking for a way to deny Scott Peterson the right to prove that he is an innocent man, by keeping the fact that there is no DNA to implicate him, a secret.
The absolute obsession to cover up the truth has failed and those who are acting like it possible to frame an innocent man over and over and over again, until they get it right, deserve the death penalty. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH."
I am bothered by the fact that the police made statements that they could not confirm Scotts alibi that he was at the marina, and allowed the media to use this statement to paint Scott as a liar long before Amber came about. And now we know they have one or more eye witnesses that saw Scott at the marina around noon, the exact time his original alibi story would have put him there.
These lies add creedence to Scott's claim that he told the Modesto Police about Amber on December 24, 2002, and indeed, it is reasonable to assume that if Scott Peterson was lying about that, the police would not have hesitated to publicly declare him a murder suspect long before he was arrested. It is now safe to assume that if you discount the lies, Scott Peterson did not give the police any legitimate reason to call him a suspect. Actions speak louder than words. The police kept saying that they were going to arrest Scott Peterson but they never dared until somebody decided to do the unthinkable.
For 4 months everyone said Scott was lying about going to the Marina and now all those same people are trying to use that alibi to hang him. Talk about pure, unadalterated hypocrisy.
When Scott Peterson was cooperative, people called him a liar because he had absolutely no idea where the MURDERERS dumped Laci's body. NAZI is an understatement, to describe the CREEPS who claim that Scott Peterson has failed to cooperate with the police. Scott Peterson told the police about Amber on December 24, 2002, because when he came home and his wife was not there, it was obvious that his wife had been kidnapped and Scott Peterson was prepared to do whatever it took, to get her back -and you can take that to the bank. The Mitchells are too bright to confuse Christmas Eve with any other day of the year, and you can take that to the bank as well. The Nazis who arrested Scott Peterson on Good Friday, are obviously too obssessive to respect anything, and you can take that to the bank as well. God did not bring Connor back for ther sake of proving that his father is a murderer, and that is another matter of fact, you can take to the bank.
414 Date: 2003-04-22 19:08:22
They forgot to plant the head ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The prosecutor says they have not collected all the evidence that is required to support the theory that Laci Peterson died in her own home. Tell us something we do not know. We clearly understand the fact that if it was legitimately possible to prove that Laci Peterson died in her own home, Scott Peterson would have been arrested months ago.
We also know that if the perpetrators are brutal enough to bring the bodies back, thay are ugly enough to have all the forensic evidence they require to stick up their own asses if they want to. It's not the crime, it's the cover up MORONS ! ! !
413 Date: 2003-04-19 17:34:18
David Sween: A Sad Day in law enforcement history ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Laci Peterson Investigation
April 4, 2003
Excessive censorship conspires to derail an independent investigation.
nsnews: Is there any reason to believe that Scott Peterson murdered Laci?
David Sween: Absolutely not.
nsnews: Then why do so many people think that Scott Peterson was involved?
David Sween: The people who are spinning the news on this one are working overtime.
nsnews: How so?
David Sween: The campaign to misrepresent the evidence is absolutely extreme.
nsnews: Can you give me an example?
David Sween: Where do I begin? Let me see now -I think the biggest example is the absolute zeal to create the impression that the police and the Rocha family have this secret alliance which will invariably lead to the arrest of Scott Peterson. For example, now that Laci's mom has said she still has hope that Laci is not dead, contrary to the police declaration that Laci is a homicide victim, the spin doctors say things like, "I wouldn't be surprised if the Rocha family was helping the police to 'catch' SP by pretending they think Laci and Connor are still alive, and perhaps Scott would not be so hesitant to be around them or talk to them? etc., etc." It is difficult to believe that such airhead theories, which are as reliable as the claim that Scott Peterson placed his wife's feet in a bucket of cement, are leading people to believe that Scott Peterson is a murderer. Are people really that gullible?
nsnews: I thought I was the one asking the questions here -are people really that gullible?
David Sween: I was thinking out loud -I am stumped. I don't have an answer. As an investigator, I simply do not understand anybody who even remotely suggests that Scott Peterson is a murder suspect and I guess that's why the police do not call him a suspect.
nsnews: Then why don't the police clear Scott Peterson?
David Sween: Now isn't that the only question that is really worth its weight? You can probably write a five volume book on all the spin that surrounds that question because that is where all the cement-related theories come from. To be brief, you have to wash all the crap away, before you reach the substance which relates to the fact that Scott Peterson, despite all the predictions of all the finest experts, has not been arrested. Let me put it this way. I wouldn't be surprised if the police have not already cleared Scott Peterson and they are just pretending that he is still the focus, to keep the real murderers off their guard.
nsnews: Is that counter spin?
David Sween: No. The simple fact of the matter is, somebody has murdered Laci Peterson, the police know it, and it is their duty and responsibility to bring Laci's murderers to justice. Scott Peterson IS NOT a suspect.
nsnews: Do you think this case will ever be solved?
David Sween: As far as I am concerned, the case has already been solved. The plot to frame Scott Peterson has failed and the end of this story is merely a matter of doting the i's and crossing the t's. It may take another year, it may take another 5 years it may take another 12 years, there is no statute of limitations here.
nsnews: And you call that a victory?
David Sween: Absolutely. If you compare this situation to the Moxley murder, you will understand. In that particular case, Michael Skakel was convicted for a murder that his emotionally disturbed tutor, Ken Littleton, evidently committed. In that case, an innocent man is in jail while the real killer has been granted immunity.
nsnews: Are the cases related?
David Sween: I don't know, is Mark Fuhrman advising the Modesto Police Department? Is Mark Fuhrman still working with Lucianne Goldberg? If the answer is yes, there may very well be a link.
nsnews: And if the link exists, have Mark Fuhrman and Lucianne Goldberg satisfied their expectations.
David Sween: Absolutely not. Unlike Michael Skakel, Scott Peterson has not been convicted and like Ken Littleton, who has spent the last 29 years of his life running and hiding, the real murderers will never rest, and they will certainly be dead, buried and in hell, by the time this case is forgotten. Like Ken Littleton, they will never get away with murder, whether they are officially convicted or not.
nsnews: You are not suggesting that granting Ken Littleton immunity is the equivalent of prosecuting Scott Peterson?
David Sween: It certainly is an equivalent. The people who kidnapped Laci Peterson seek immunity from prosecution and Scott Peterson is their ticket to the peace of mind they seek.
nsnews: Are you surprised that Scott Peterson has not been arrested?
David Sween: Very surprised.
nsnews: Why is that?
David Sween: Difficult question because I am rarely surprised by anything. I have to give you an analogy to answer that, and if you do not know anything about the bizarre conviction of Michael Skakel, you might miss the point. To be brief, people like Dominick Dunne, Mark Fuhrman and Lucianne Goldberg created the environment that is responsible for the Skakel conviction, Scott Peterson has been the recipient of the same sort of negative, lynch mob publicity, and in that respect, the failure to arrest Scott Peterson is very surprising. Perhaps the Skakel case proved difficult to defend because it is impossible to convincingly prove what you or anybody else did over 27 years ago. It is difficult to defend yourself against fictitious publicity that is relentlessly promoted, and Michael Skakel is in jail, as a consequence.
nsnews: Do you think that Scott Peterson will ever be arrested?
David Sween: If it was not for the reporting of nsnews and wrtv news, I would say he would have been arrested in March of 2003, just as all the "authorities" and all the "experts" were predicting.
nsnews: And what do you say now?
David Sween: Absolutely Not. Scott Peterson will never be arrested.
nsnews: How can you be so sure?
David Sween: Because at this point in time, if I was Scott Peterson, I would want the police to arrest me. I would want the police to show me the proof that my wife had been murdered so that I could begin to investigate the people who are responsible for her murder.
nsnews: It sounds like you are saying that Scott Peterson is invincible.
David Sween: Absolutely !
nsnews: Do you always put yourself in other people's shoes?
David Sween: You are not a human being, if you don't.
nsnews: Mr. Sween, it looks like you have been discredited?
David Sween: Excuse me?
nsnews: Scott Peterson has been arrested and you said that he was invincible?
David Sween: This is not exactly a typical arrest and I am an investigator, I am not a fortuneteller. When desperate criminals plant a fetus because every other effort to force an arrest has failed, I do not accept the proposition that a legitimate arrest has been obtained. This arrest is nothing more and nothing less than an act of pure showmanship and absolute desperation. The bodies of victims do not conveniently wash to shore in unison, after being in the water for 4 months, simply because somebody wants to arrest Scott Peterson. You can call this an arrest but in my opinion, it is an illegal, unjustifiable detainment.
nsnews: How can you possibly say that?
David Sween: I can say that with absolute confidence because Scott Peterson is the only person who has retained his credibility. When Scott Peterson publicly exposed the fact that he told the police about Amber Frey on December 24, 2002, he was obviously telling the truth, because if he wasn't, I firmly believe that the police would have immediately and publicly called him a suspect, instead of merely acting like Peterson was a suspect. Police duplicity in this case has been so absolutely extreme, that I do not think that it is even remotely plausible to suggest that there is any reason to suspect that Peterson murdered Laci, unless we accept some very deliberate and ignorant lies.
nsnews: Is there any such thing as an illegitimate arrest?
David Sween: With all due respect, I think that you have to be pretty stupid to consider the sudden arrest of somebody who has not even been declared to be a suspect, to be legitimate. If you recall, during our last interview, I said "if I was Scott Peterson, I would want the police to arrest me. I would want the police to show me the proof that my wife had been murdered so that I could begin to investigate the people who are responsible for her murder." I called their bluff, and on the very day that Scott Peterson was arrested, the police chief essentially disclosed the fact that despite previous declarations, he did not have any evidence that Laci Peterson was dead, prior to the discovery of Scott Peterson's son. Needless to say, the perpetrators knew that Scott would never be arrested unless the bodies surfaced, and Scott's son and wife conveniently surfaced, proving once and for all, that Scott Peterson is the only person in the world who gave a damn about his own wife and child.
nsnews: You are an incredible Detective.
David Sween: Not really, I merely rely upon the logic of the experts and reject the dictum of their false assumptions.
nsnews: Can you give me an example?
David Sween: Jeffrey Toobin said "it seems to me that the biggest piece of evidence here is that the bodies of the two victims were discovered within a couple of miles, where Scott Peterson says he was, on the day that Laci Peterson disappeared." How convenient. Needless to say, if, as all the evidence indicates, Scott Peterson is not a homicidal maniac, the people who planted the bodies are as sick as the people who murdered Laci Peterson. Moreover, the relentless campaign to implicate Scott Peterson is motivated by the obsession to get away with murder.
nsnews: Why would anybody frame an innocent man?
David Sween: To get away with murder. Jeffrey Toobin said that the recovery of Laci's body "is a little like the Chandra Levy case. The body was recovered but it did not produce much evidence to lead to any arrest. Here, the location of the body was very important, but actual evidence produced there doesn't seem to have come up with much at all.
nsnews: Then why was Scott arrested?
David Sween: Because the murderers are extremely aggressive.
nsnews: Are you serious?
David Sween: Absolutely. Jeffrey Toobin was not as explicit, but he essentially said the same thing when he said; "Well, I think that in cases like this, the question that all of us ask, and the question that the jury certainly asks, if not the husband then who did this? Who had a motive?...It's a strong case because it is simply implausible to most people that anyone other than her husband could have murdered her." Needless to say, that is the prejudice that the murderers have exploited in this case, but this is evidently a repeat performance and it is not as implausible, the second time around. In particular, the M.O. of the Chandra Levy and the Laci Peterson disappearances are very similar and the peculiar recovery of their bodies should arouse the suspicion that these murders are in fact linked.
nsnews: Who killed Chandra Levy?
David Sween: I don't know, if somebody who allegedly commits suicide is in fact the victim of a murderer who covers his or her tracks, it doesn't change the fact that the suicide verdict is false. It is not possible to respond to every question. All we can do, to be effective, competent investigators is to reject the consequence of prejudice. I can certainly tell you that the murder of Laci Peterson is evidently a revision of the failure to arrest Gary Condit, and I can tell you that people who bring bodies back when they are too useless to determine the cause of death are sophisticated cover up artists, but like all murderers, they are not very bright. And I can also tell you that if Gary Condit or Scott Peterson had murdered anybody, the circumstantial evidence would have been credible.
nsnews: What does the arrest of Scott Peterson mean?
David Sween: From my perspective, it doesn't mean anything at all because it will not advance my knowledge about the murder of Laci Peterson. From Scott's perspective, he is now clearly aware of the fact that he has been framed. It's very bizarre to watch. it's like falsely assuming that somebody committed suicide or murder and inventing the "evidence" to justify the delusion. It's very sad and it is evidently far more common than we think.
411 Date: 2003-04-16 16:55:53
Does Mark Fuhrman know why the bodies surfaced now? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Who cares whether it was Laci and Connor? The emotional impact of finding 2 proxy corpses now that every other effort to produce the smoking gun fizzled, is exactly what the Doctor ordered. The press repeatedly suggests [through proxies like Bill Garcia and Ava Frey] that Scott Peterson murdered Laci Peterson, so the perpetrators think they are Scott-free. The latest body find certainly worked, didn't it? It gave Detective Doug Ridenour the opportunity to hold another press conference, to announce the fact that he has still not cleared Scott Peterson. Makes him feel like he is earning his salary.
It is certainly easy to capture Detective Doug Ridenour's attention, isn't it? In his own words:
"The fact that you have a baby found along with, or fairly close to, a female, that brings probably the interest to this department." What a break!
The tight-lipped Ridenour pledged that the intense interest in the case by news media would not prompt the Modesto Police Department to rush to conclusions. Oh good, that is why they haven't cleared Scott Peterson. They haven't exactly bought all the hype or he would have been in jail by now.
"We're not going to allow the hype to interfere with the investigation," Detective Doug Ridenour said.
Sounds like Ridenour has bought most of the hype, he is just waiting for yet another, smoking gun. Amber Frey was leaning the wrong way, he could not very well make the claim that she had replaced Laci.
The bodies of both a woman and a fetus washed up on the Richmond shoreline -what are the chances of that happening? Did the bodies think like people like Ava Frey and Private Investigators like Bill Garcia? On the other hand, if the people who killed Laci have repeatedly failed to produce a smoking gun, despite a depth of rumor that makes the Kennedy assassination a relatively solveable crime, you would kind of expect this mind numbing horror to "wash up" on the Richmond shoreline wouldn't you? Isn't that the deliberate act of somebody who is desperate enough to murder a pregnant woman? It is certainly not the act of a normal person like Scott Peterson, is it? We would have to falsely assume that Scott Peterson is a murderer to understand this grotesque horror. Is that what the police are doing -assuming that Scott Peterson murdered Laci? Of course it is. Are the police infallible? Of course they are not. Did they mess this one up? Not unless they turn Scott Peterson into another Richard Albert Ricci. People are already hoping that Scott Peterson commits suicide so that the police can bury this scapegoat too. It certainly worked with Ricci, until Elizabeth Smart came back. Laci Peterson is not coming back and if the police claim Scott Peterson in the process, it will be a triple homicide.
Detective Doug Ridenour is beginning to look and act like Brent Rocha. Who cares who murdered Laci, as long as Brent Rocha and Doug Ridenour pretend they are confident and that they know exactly what they are doing. Pehaps, if they began this investigation by looking for a live body instead of a corpse, Laci would still be alive today. Tough to live with, they need Scott's head on a silver platter.
The improper focus on Scott Peterson is a de facto cover up and when authorities seek to create the impression that they are infallible they routinely pervert justice. Scott Peterson is not guilty, no matter how long and no matter how many body parts are thrown in the paths of people who walk their dogs. The microscope cleared Gary Condit and it has absolutely cleared Scott Peterson. What is taking so long this time? Is it Ava Frey and Bill Garcia? Is it the people who are manipulating Detective Doug Ridenour and Brent Rocha? How long will their ignorance be the excuse that is necessary to cover up the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson?
If Dominick Dunne could not frame Gary Condit what makes them think they can frame Scott Peterson -is it just their ignorant, extreme, vulgar, obscene tactics? Every smoking gun has fizzled under scrutiny. Enough is enough.
410 Date: 2003-04-15 19:01:32
Barb Douglas ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
CUT TO THE CHASE ! ! !
Contra Costa County sheriff's spokesman Jimmy Lee said it could take days or even weeks before experts establish whether the bodies of the woman and of an infant found Sunday are those of the Modesto woman, who was eight months pregnant when she vanished in December, and her son.
Oh cut the crap, Fuhrman told us its Laci and her son ! Let's R-O-L-L ! ! !
409 Date: 2003-04-15 17:44:26
Of course it's Laci, you fool ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"All it is at this point is they had a body wash up," said Modesto Sgt. Ron Cloward, who has headed the search. "We have no indication at this point that it has anything to do with Laci."
If Mark Fuhrman says its Laci, it's Laci. Mark Fuhrman is never wrong ! Ava Frey is never wrorg. Garcia is never wrong. It's a double homicide, the media even made that absolutely clear.
What a joke !
408 Date: 2003-04-15 12:38:16
I knew they could not resist ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
On November 22, 2003, the Modesto Bee reported that it is unclear when Frey learned that the man she had been dating, Scott Peterson, was married and his pregnant wife missing since Christmas Eve.
What the hell is going on here? A man's wife is murdered and the useless media does not even know what the hell Amber knew and when she knew it. THIS STINKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mark Geragos is not going to take this BULLSHIT sitting down !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies