scottisinnocent
Unregistered User
(9/16/03 6:26 am) Reply
Connor was a full term baby delivered in captivity -DUH !
A body has been found near a marina in Richmond, Calif., in an area frequented by people who walk their dogs -wow, what a neat way to make sure that the body of a newborn is discovered -how creative !
Beats planting Laci's body in Scott's new truck, doesn't it?
Modesto investigators were airlifted to Richmond's Point Isabel Regional Park Monday after a second discovery, a badly decomposed female body was spotted in shallow water a little more than a mile from where the corpse of a male fetus was discovered on Sunday.
Modesto police arrived by helicopter in the late afternoon, but a department spokesman downplayed any connection to the missing woman -they don't want to appear to be too excited.
Why didn't they move this fast when Laci Peterson was spotted alive?
The site is only a few miles from the Berkeley Marina where Scott Peterson said he went fishing the day his pregnant wife disappeared Christmas Eve. Now that would blow his alibi right out of the water, wouldn't it?
Meanwhile, the Contra Costa County Coroner has identified a dead fetus found Sunday afternoon as a full-term male.
Police are not sure if the discovery of the body and the baby are connected. Oh, what a coincidence !
Of course, the bodies are Laci & her baby, and they have not been there since 12/24 because the murderers were planning to plant them in Scott's new truck, so it does not take a genius to figure out the fact that someone else killed them & put the bodies where they knew Scott had been. Nobody is stupid enough, [except perhaps the Modesto Police Department] to believe that Scott Peterson kept the bodies hidden and dumped them in the last month or so.
The murderers were very stupid to dump the bodies in the Bay because all they did was to confirm their obsession to frame Scott Peterson.
Sarah88
Unregistered User
(10/25/03 12:11 pm) Reply
SCOTT
(Ok, I'm sorry, but I just heard some of the evil, sadistic crap the anti-Scott sickos write, and I need to have my little breakdown here, so no one gets hurt... )
SCOTT LEE PETERSON IS INNOCENT, INNOCENT, INNOCENT!!!!!!!!!
WHY can't people REALIZE THAT?!?!?!
Scott is just a sweet, charming man who had the perfect life and some ignorant, vile monster ruined that and it WASN'T HIMSELF!!!
Amber Frey is no @#%$ motive; they need to release him!! Haven't they caused him enough pain already?!
Re: SCOTT
Bodies are "badly decomposed" wjhen they are placed in shallow graves. Cold water preserves them.
686 Date: 2004-02-11 12:02:50
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The death of Vivian Mitchell is as eerie as locating the headless corpse of Laci Peterson and Scott's "pristine condition" son, to implicate an innocent man.
Vivian Mitchell was a key witness because, like Scott Peterson, she told the police that Laci was wearing black pants and a white top on Christmas Eve. If Scott was the murderer, the last thing he would do is lie about the clothes that Laci wore, when he killed her.
When you dig beneath the surface, the entire case against Scott Peterson has been about using the intelligence that only the murderers would know, to implicate Scott Peterson. As long as Vivian Mitchell was alive, she was in a position to clearly and convincingly expose the preposterous, prosecution suggestion that Scott Peterson is the murderer because he lied about what Laci was wearing, on the day she disappeared. Clearly, Scott Peterson did not tell Vivian Mitchell what to tell the police and that is what you call pure evidence. When Laci walked Mackenzie, on Christmas Eve, and I use the fact that Laci's own dog confirms the suggestion, to prove the point, she wore black pants and a white top, and this simple fact was widely reported in the media. Did anybody issue an "all points bulletin" to locate a missing woman in tan pants? Vivian Mitchell would have died laughing if that had happened.
Scott Peterson had no idea what Laci wore when she magically surfaced because he did not shoot his beautiful wife in the head. My ignorant critics say that if I am so smart, why don't I find Laci's head? The answer is simple. I am not responsible for the murder of Laci Peterson and I am not the one who is exploiting the knowledge that only the murderers would know. I merely point out the fact that Laci was probably dismembered before being dumped, probably to cover up the cause of death. All the preposterous, "magic head" theories that pundits routinely manufacture are so disgusting, that I have a panic attack, every time I hear a moron advance his so called, investigative skills, to suit the "revelations" that are published in the National Enquirer.
The people who are responsible for the murder of Laci Peterson are experts at exploiting their "intelligence" and the ignorance of all the pundits, but in the final analysis, they are directly responsible for proving that Scott Peterson is absolutely innocent. We are talking about innocent beyond the shadow of any doubt, because there is no greater difference between a "slam dunk" and this transparent scam which seeks to create the false appearance that Scott Peterson is guilty. There is no greater difference between Scott Peterson and the people who kidnapped his wife, on December 24, 2003. Vivian Mitchell may be dead, but her observations are as relevant as ever.
685 Date: 2004-02-10 23:36:57
CASE CLOSED ( no email / message.alturl.com) wrote:
684 Date: 2004-02-10 23:27:38
Pam Clark ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
I know this sounds gross, but I was reading another board which suggested that Laci was buried in a shallow grave and then dumped, to implicate Scott Peterson and the argument makes a lot of sense because the evidence indicates that Laci was probably dismembered prior to going into the water.
Isn't that why her head is missing? I am not one to believe preposterous theories -the head is not there...period, and that strongly suggests that the head is probably still in the shallow grave the body was initially dumped in. If that was not the case, the head would have turned up by now.
Like the rest of you, I also think that Vivian Mitchell and Laci's dog are currently the most reliable witnesses to the fact that Laci was alive and well, on December 24, 2002.
683 Date: 2004-02-10 12:21:19
To accuse Scott, you need... ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
--A hysterical police force that refuses to return the calls of intelligent, reliable eye witnesses like Vivian Mitchell
--A hysterical DA's Office that repeatedly leaks to the National Enquirer to demonize Scott
--A gullible public that tolerates this excessive abuse
--Hysterical, neo-Nazi eye witnesses who replace independent witnesses like Vivian Mitchell because they claim that Scott Peterson is guilty
--Hysterical demagogues like Nancy Grace, who falsely claim that eye witnesses like Vivian Mitchell coached Scott Peterson's dog, to create an alibi
--The bizarre, disgusting list goes on and on.
All you need to conclusively prove that Scott Peterson was absolutely shocked when his wife was kidnapped on Christmas Eve is the ability to view the evidence without distorting it
--it's called, simple, common sense.
682 Date: 2004-02-09 18:12:52
Richard Reed ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Mrs Mitchell was not alone. At least two other residents of the neighborhood where Laci Peterson lived also claim they saw her walking her dog between 9:45 and 10:30 a.m. on the day she vanished. These witnesses are extremely reliable and only a fool would challenge them because Laci Peterson's own dog confirmed their onservations. I agree with everybody who considers Vivian Mitchel's testimony to be conclusive.
681 Date: 2004-02-09 17:33:27
Lisa Kent ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Bill Mitchell defends the credibility of his wife. "I really think they had a theory, and facts that don't fit the theory sometimes don't impress others,'' Bill Mitchell, 84, said in a telephone interview from his Modesto home. "We're both long in years, but she was a good observer, and she was positive up to last Sunday when she could still talk."
Vivian Mitchell's account would have corroborated Scott Peterson's account of what happened Christmas Eve morning. Geragos has suggested that Laci Peterson was abducted by two men while walking her dog in a nearby park.
Bill Mitchell said that although he and his wife met several times with Geragos and his legal team, no formal deposition was ever taken. Without it, her account would be considered hearsay and would never make it to Peterson's trial.
Robert Talbott, a law professor at the University of San Francisco, says Vivian Mitchell's testimony could have been damning for the prosecution's case, which appears to be overwhelmingly circumstantial so far.
"If the jury would have found her credible, it would have meant big problems for the prosecution," Talbott said. "It would have thrown their whole timeline off."
God Bless Vivian Mitchell, she was a very credible witness to the fact that Laci Peterson was kidnapped.
680 Date: 2004-02-08 02:08:10
Jordan McQueen ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Vivian Mitchell was not an old fogey. It's too bad she is being treated like one -guess they have to do it now, to justify her death.
679 Date: 2004-02-08 01:46:35
This was posted, March 2, 2003 ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Has it been pointed out that the Bill and Vivian Mitchell live next to the same river bed park system as the Peterson's? I'm very curious if these three parks have a trail meandering throughout?
Mrs. Mitchell said she thought Laci was heading for Kewin Park. Kewin Park is also a part of the very same river bed park system as the La Loma Park next to the Petersons. Apparently these parks adjoin...Kewin being to the SW of La Loma.
Could Laci have been either entering (or exiting)the park in the area of the Mitchell home?
Of course the MPD doesn't want the Mitchell's statement. Their entire focus since day ONE evaporates along with their *93* sacks of "evidence" in the event that the sighting of Laci after 10 a.m. that morning is verified.
===========================
Take a peek: Very interesting. recall the Peterson address is: 523 Covena Avenue, Modesto
William and Vivian Mitchell 231 Buena Vista Drive, Modesto
The Mitchells house has the star. The Peterson house is located at the upper right of the map (click on the arrow on the upper right side) The streets that follow the southern perimeter of this park run directly from the Peterson's to the Mitchell's. (The Peterson's resident is just around the corner from Edgebrook Dr., on Covena.)
No wonder the Modesto resident in this group who appears as a MPD mouthpiece wants to discount and disparage the Mitchell's as senile old fogey's. ..and the MPD doesn't want to hear anything about it.
It's obvious when you look at the map.
***You're right. The map certainly makes it look like the Mitchell house would be right along a likely dog walking route from the Peterson's. Interesting.
678 Date: 2004-02-07 15:08:23
Brian Walt ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
If the DA's Office uses emotional nutcases like Nancy Grace to discredit Vivian Mitchell, it raises serious suspicions.
Who else did they use?
I think it is very serious when a witness who proves that a defendant is innocent, is found dead. It's like the death of reason -to be replaced by the insanity that Nancy Grace promotes.
677 Date: 2004-02-06 22:55:54
James McDonnell ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
If four pregnant women were walking their dogs, Vivian Mitchell saw Laci Peterson because the other dogs were not reported missing.
rforsland
Unregistered User
(2/21/04 11:20 pm) Reply
motive
Scott writes:
>>Of course, the bodies are Laci & her baby, and they have not been there since 12/24 because the murderers were planning to plant them in Scott's new truck,<<
I was wondering if you have any thoughts on the motive of the murderers ?? Most killers distance themselves as fast as they can from the crime scene and would not risk being connected to the bodies once they have dumped them..be it in a shallow grave or wherever....They have gotten away...why risk even having the bodies found at all ?? Why would they care about seeing Scott hang for it ??
Unless the killers are not strangers, maybe even residents of the neighborhood...then it would benefit them greatly to have the case closed..Its been mentioned that Scott had told Amber that he knew who was responsible...I wonder who out there would hate him that much as to risk transporting corpses to the SF Bay...All it would take to get pulled over is one taillight out...5 mph over the posted speed limit...passing a cop that hasn't had his donut yet...a huge gamble just to ice the cake...Modesto LE probably would have filed charges even if no bodies ever turned up...
Why risk it at all? Goes to show you how desperate the killers were. After all, the police did not dare to arrest Scott, until the murderers made it easy.
The zeal to destroy Scott's alibi is too transparent and the desperate timing is equally obvious.
SCOTT
)
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies