John Stewart
Unregistered User
(6/16/03 6:03 pm) Reply
Fuhrman is pulling strings again -can Goldberg be far behind
Det. Mark Fuhrman said that Scott Peterson has already made statements that amount to a CONFESSION OF THE CRIME! ( about murdering his wife)? What is this Mark Furhman guy talking about? Fuhrman says that this Scott Peterson case is "JUST LIKE THE MICHAEL SKAKEL CASE"?
He is right. Skakel was successfully railroaded and Fuhrer Fuhrman is evidently doing everything he possibley can, to make sure that Scott Peterson is also railroaded.
Needless to say, Fuhrman and his secret partner, Lucianne Goldberg, belong in the cells that Michael Skakel and scott Peterson ware warming up for them. Sounds like Fuhrman is Ted Rowland's secret source.
RickHanson
Unregistered User
(6/17/03 2:49 pm) Reply
FinalPlot
Unregistered User
(6/18/03 9:21 pm) Reply
Looks like they are getting rusty here !
Goldberg: Mark, did you plant any blood?
Fuhrman: No Lucianne, Laci was pregnant, that would clear him.
Goldberg: What?
Fuhrman: Conner was a full term baby, remember?
Goldberg: What the hell are we going to do now?
Fuhrman: We have to use his own words, remember Skakel?
Goldberg: But he was innocent Mark.
Fuhrman: That's what I mean.
Goldberg: Hey Dominick, any ideas?
Dunne: Well, Lucianne, Scott is not a Kennedy.
Goldberg: Oh, shut up you fool, Mark, what do we have to do now?
Fuhrman: We use his own words.
Goldberg: You taped 4 thousand calls and you have nothing to show for it?
Fuhrman: Lucianne, Scott is innocent.
Goldberg: I know stupid, I mean another confession, a "con-fession."
Fuhrman: Well, we have 176 calls that nobody even knows about.
Goldberg: So what does that mean?
Fuhrman: "I am going to get away with murder because I am a Kennedy."
Goldberg: aaaaaaaaaaahahaha, good boy Mark, you had me worried there, for a second.
Fuhrman: Lucianne, darling, you're talking to the best.
Goldberg: Okay, but we need a foreigner on tape, you know a southern drawl that will make Nancy Grace pee her pants.
Fuhrman: Relax Lucianne, WE made him call Scott, remember? Besides, the standard of proof is Richard Ricci, we're not talking rocket science here. Nancy Grace thinks that breathing is incriminating.
Goldberg: Dunne will just love that famous, southern drawl.
Fuhrman: Hey, where are you going?
Goldman: I have friends in Langley.
Fuhrman: What are you talking about, get off the phone, I have an idea?
Goldberg: Deepthroat, is that you?
Deepthroat: Hi Lucianne, who's the target now?
Goldberg: Scott Peterson.
Deepthroat: What?
Goldberg: You heard me, how do we get a conviction?
Deepthroat: Oh my God, Goldberg, I told you about the Bin Laden tape didn't I?
Goldberg: Oh yes Deep, that actor made Bin Laden say that Iraq supported Alquaeda, and then we invaded. How was that audio recovered again?
Deepthroat: Recovered and recycled phonerecords Lucianne, don't you remember we had his phone tapped BEFORE we tipped him off?
Goldberg: Oh yeah but he's dead.
Deepthroat: Lucianne [using his finest, southern drawl]
Goldberg: Sorry Deep, must be all this pressure that David Sween has created.
Deepthroat: Look Lucianne, it isn't that complicated. You recover an audio recording, you say that nobody has ever heard it before and nobody can say it has been manufactured in Langley, Virginia. It's an old standard Lucianne. Audio is the best, you can create gaps, remember? Oh, and make sure the judge hears it first, you know, it will make him think he's Sherlock.
Goldberg: Thanks Deep.
Deepthroat: Goodnight Lucianne.
Fuhrman: What did he say?
Goldberg: Mark, you're a genius, did you say you have 176 new cellphone records that nobody has ever heard before?
Fuhrman: That's right Lucianne.
Goldberg: That's plenty.
Fuhrman: And don't forget the stripper.
Goldberg: Oh that's right, she was going to drive Scott to Mexico. How much heroin is it going to cost this time?
Fuhrman: Don't worry Lucianne, Dunne is going to write a bestseller and you'll get all your cash back?
Goldberg: Oh yeah, his rehabilitation program. Mark, stay out of the limelight this time.
Fuhrman: Easy for you to say. I do all the work and Brazelton gets all the glory?
Goldberg: Mark !
Fuhrman: I know, I know, Geragos is no Mickey Sherman.
Goldberg: Remember the golden rule Mark.
Fuhrman: I know, I know, nobody talks, everybody walks?
Goldberg: Except Scott, aaaaaaaaahahahahahaha ! What about the trucker, how's his testimony coming along?
Fuhrman: He's all freaked out about all this talk concerning Laci's head.
Goldberg: God Damned it Mark, how much longer can we delay the prelim?
Fuhrman: We can always pull a Richard Ricci.
Goldberg: And then we'll never know...
Fuhrman: And we have the tape as backup.
Goldberg: aaaaaaaaaaahahaha, that sounds more like, "we can always pull a Gregory Coleman".
Fuhrman: It's mix and match time Lucianne, by the way, you remember Gregory Coleman, don't you Dominick? He's the one who said that Michael Skakel said, "I'm a Kennedy, I'm going to get away with murder", and then the poor fellow overdosed on heroin, after a judge put his testimony/crap on the record.
Goldberg: Too bad nobody believed the jerk.
Fuhrman: But everybody printed it.
Goldberg: Duh, why the hell do you think we need to rehabilitate Dominick Dunne?
Fuhrman: Right, hey Dunne, what are we going to call this one?
Dunne: How about, 'Murder in Modesto'?
Fuhrman: Brilliant!
Goldberg: Cause of death?
Fuhrman: Brilliantly concealed.
Goldberg: Murder weapon?
Fuhrman: Brilliantly concealed.
Goldberg: Dunne, do we need a murder weapon?
Dunne: How about 'Death by golfball'?
Goldberg: Sounds like a 'soft kill' to me.
Dunne: Done.
Fuhrman: Nancy Grace will love that, Scott's a golfer.
Goldberg: That should kill another alibi.
Dunne: Wow, I'm a famous sleuth again. Everybody loves Dominick Dunne, except that pesky, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Fuhrman: I don't know about you Dominick, but I'm beginning to get the feeling that Scott is going to hang himself after the judge hears the recovered audio tape.
Dunne: What a great book. Sounds just like Ken Littleton, who now claims that Michael Skakel confessed to him personally, a direct contradiction to his sworn testimony at trial. Isn't that like a revised audio? I wonder why Michael never killed himself?
David Sween
Unregistered User
(6/19/03 4:43 am) Reply
What will they think of next?
If nobody has ever heard the 176 audios, then how does demagogue Nancy Grace, Modesto Police Department blowhard, KTVU-TV's, Ted Rowlands, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SAN FRANCISCO, JIM HAMMER, and JEANINE FERRIS PIRRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, know about the recording of the man with the southern drawl?
Is that the kidnapper who shot Laci in the head or was Laci shot by the secret witness who allegedly saw Scott Peterson transporting Laci's lifeless body, on December 23rd, the day before she was witnessed, walking her dog.
Who is feeding all the rumors about the stripper?
Justice4all
Unregistered User
(6/19/03 11:28 am) Reply
No Harm No Foul !!!!!!!!! LOL
Date: 2003-06-19 14:21:18
Caroline Eves
176 calls that nobody has ever heard of?
This has got to be the biggest joke of the century. 176 calls that nobody has ever listened to and Nancy Grace has an orgasm hosting Larry King Live, as she discusses the man with the southern drawl, on the tapes that nobody has ever heard. Sounds like she doesn't know the difference between drool and drawl.
_________________
Date: 2003-06-19 17:19:27
Barb Douglas wrote:
The Da's Office is in full, damage control mode, and they have dispatched an army of pro-Prosecution Posters, to explain away the effort to frame Scott Peterson. Bluehous always come through, he's the poster who claimed that a trucker/cop spotted Scott with his wife's lifeless body, driving to the Marina at 3 am., on December 23, 2002. Needless to say, like Richard Ricci before him, Scott was also sleeping with his wife, at the time the Prosecution's secret witness allegedly spotted Scott with Laci's head flopping back and forth, in his truck. The significance of this secret witness is bigger than ever, now that Scott would like to know where Laci's head is. This is what Bluehouse is currently posting:
BlueHouse
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 2997
These recordings were discovered and recovered by an expert from Pen-Link which is the software used for the wiretap.
He was explaining I believe that the technology AT &T uses caused the software to not signal the agents monitoring that there was an incoming call.
The calls were copied to a CD and sent to the judge only. Only 10 seconds of one call was listened to, a man with a southern drawl talking about business with Scott. There is more info on the LKL thread from last night.
Of course some of you are going to insist the agents listened to everything then told everything to the DA. Whatever. It makes no difference because just like the other calls in question, the judge will decide what if anything will be allowed to be used.
NOW THAT'S WHAT YOU CALL A SOPHISTICATED PLOT TO FRAME SCOTT PETERSON.
_________________
Date: 2003-06-19 17:28:32
David Sween wrote:
NANCY GRACE: New evidence revealed in last- minute court filings. Today, 176 new phone calls added to the state's ammo against Scott Peterson.
THAT IS NOT "TALKING ABOUT BUSINESS".
_________________________
Date: 2003-06-19 17:37:43
Barb Douglas wrote:
Ted Rowlands: These were -- there's 176 different calls. They're not sure that all 176 of these are actual phone calls or discussions between Scott Peterson and anybody else. However, they were found by a district attorney investigator.
And to see if -- just randomly, they checked in on one of these calls, listened for it for 10 seconds, and it was Scott Peterson talking to somebody with a Southern drawl. So at that point, they stopped recording right away, and they sealed all of these calls up. They put them onto a CD. They sealed it and have handed it over now to the judge in this case, Judge Girolami.
_________________________
Date: 2003-06-19 17:44:25
David Sween wrote:
That's typical spin. Notice how they casually turn "ammo against Scott Peterson" into "a man with a southern drawl talking about business with Scott."
That's like the difference between a brutal homicide and a "soft kill". If you don't read between the lines, you can frame anybody, anytime.
_________________________
Date: 2003-06-19 18:15:05
Tom Wilkinson wrote:
The CD was obviously released to compensate for the fact that there is no forensic evidence to implicate Scott, no blood was found in Laci's home, and when you are trying to understand a criminal investigation, timing is everything -the recovery of a new CD is a major development.
______________________
Date: 2003-06-19 18:35:48
David Sween
Don't you just love their "talking points".
"No harm, no foul."
No doubt, DEMAGOGUE Nancy Grace, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SAN FRANCISCO, JIM HAMMER, and JEANINE FERRIS PIRRO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK determined that if they can make Christopher Pixley say "no harm, no foul" they can successfully frame Scott Peterson.
The boy is young, plenty of room to grow and to learn.
Caroline Eves
Unregistered User
(6/20/03 5:11 am) Reply
Mark Fuhrman is Lucianne Goldberg's Ambulance Chaser.
This BIGGEST Joke I have ever heard is the preposterous claim that the Police are ignorant morons who did not know what to do about the murder of Martha Moxley until the incredible, superhuman Detective came along, to save the day.
The Police DID NOT fail to prosecute a fragile, shy, innocent, 15 year old child named Michael Skakel. The Police failed to prosecute a perverse, demented, homicidal sex maniac named Ken Littleton, a creepy drunkard who left a trail of dead bodies, wherever he happened to reside.
Martha Moxley was just one of many, unfortunate unsolved murders, what is Mark Fuhrman doing about all the other DEAD BODIES. What's wrong with Fuhrman, is he Lucianne Goldberg's ambulance chaser?
no kidding
Unregistered User
(6/26/03 9:26 am) Reply
Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley !
The proof that Liittleton murdered Martha Moxley is absolutely conclusive.
"Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered. The simple fact that Ken was responsible for Michael's welfare has made it very difficult for Ken to conceal his guilt because his consistent obsession to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley never fails to surface. Indeed, Ken Littleton is so obsessed by the need to manufacture an alibi to conceal his guilt, that his mind predictably blanks out when he is asked even the simplest question which needs to be answered, to determine the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.
The only undeniable fact about Ken Littleton and the murder of Martha Moxley is that he needs an alibi to cover his tracks, but unfortunately for Ken, the one he manufactured was so stupid, that it does not even pass the laugh test. Ken Littleton claims that he did not even know Martha Moxley, before she was murdered. Ken Littleton claims that he did not even know that she existed. Incredible alibi, isn't it? Ken Littleton could not have possibly murdered Martha Moxley because he did not even know who she was. That is Ken Littleton's "BIG LIE" and it bought him the time he needed to get away with murder, but in retrospect, it should have bought him a life sentence for the murder of Martha Moxley.
Ken Littleton's alibi is well rehearsed, very firm and absolutely unbelievable. In his own words:
"My first night at the Skakel house was Oct. 30, 1975. I never met or saw Martha Moxley before Oct. 30, 1975, or after Oct. 30, 1975."
It is absolutely astounding that the media has provided Ken Littleton the opportunity to deny Martha Moxley's existence and that it has not challenged this ridiculous alibi. Needless to say, Littleton's confidenent denial stems, not from his innocence, but from the knowledge that he acted alone, because if Michael Skakel had been involved in the murder of Martha Moxley, as others have speculated, Ken Littleton would have been in a position to expose the fact. But Ken Littleton was a witness for the prosecution, he did not produce evidence of Michael's involvement, and he inadvertently incriminated himself in the process because if Michael Skakel was guilty, Ken Littleton would have been in a position to prove it.
Ken Littleton pretends that he didn't know who Martha Moxley was prior to her murder but that is clearly a preposterous lie. Clearly, on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, Ken the Tutor and Martha the flirt were the major attraction, and it is easier to part the Red Sea than to avoid an encounter between Ken and Martha.
It was Ken Littleton's first day on the job and the word that the Skakels had a new tutor, had invariably spread like wilfire. Needless to say, the meeting between the Skakel tutor and the neighborhood flirt was the most anticipated event of the entire night. Ken asked Michael about Martha, Martha flirted with everybody and young people always manage to find a way to shoot the breeze with each other. Martha was creative enough to find Ken, and Ken was certainly asking all the right questions about the attractive flirt to arrange a chance encounter. Unfortunately for Martha, Ken wanted to do much more than shoot the breeze, and when the young flirt tried to scream, Ken panicked and struck her in the face, without thinking, and that was the beginning of his long nightmare. That was the start of his persistent obsession to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley, and it is an obsession that has never wavered. Some people would call this circumstantial evidence. Those who understand the significance of absolute consistency call it absolute proof, and the room to doubt the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley, has been oblitherated by the force of the evidence.
The Prosecution had no trouble cultivating a witness like Ken Littleton because he was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, and Ken Littleton was always obsessive about the need to cover up the truth. When the Prosecution developed the determination to blame the murder of Martha Moxley on Michael Skakel, Ken Littleton predictably exploited the opportunity. Ken Littleton has never failed to manipulate the circumstances, to get awauy with the murder of Martha Moxley. His initial crime, the actual murder, was an unintended crime of passion, but the rest of his life is a deliberate act to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.
Ken Littleton is an evil genius because the foundation of the plot to frame a Skakel brother for the Moxley murder, was initially his doing. Having delivered a knockout punch [her nose had been broken by what appeared to be a punch in the face, according to the autopsy] the athletic tutor had narrowed the pool of potential suspects, and the Skakel golf club expanded and confused the investigation. The drunk children that Ken Littleton was supervising were unlikely suspects and Ken Littleton's alibi was not questioned, probably because his mental instability [being an undiagnosed bipolar] was not known to the police, at the time. Despite his insanity, the manipulative tutor was clever enough to divert attention away from the fact that his own fist was the actual murder weapon, and he managed to create the preposterous suggestion that if the Skakels did not own golf clubs, Martha Moxley would still be alive today.
When Ken Littleton mutilated Martha Moxley's body with the Skakel golf club, he added the grotesque element that confused the authorities and betrayed the incurable insanity of a very dangerous person who is as manipulative and as deceptive as somebody like Ken Littleton is.
It is not possible to control the truth. You can be opposed by an army of hired advocates who dispute everything, and they do, and they can certainly dominate publicity through their fickle, aggressive advocacy, but there is absolutely nothing that that anybody can do to control the truth. Like clockwork, Ken Littleton's apologists cry "conspiracy" whenever they are confronted by the obvious truths that the mainstream media ignores. Their concern is legitimate. If the obsession to demonize Michael Skakel fails, the power of the self-fulfilling prophesy breaks down and the suggestion that Ken Littleton is a poor victim is reconsidered. Indeed, Ken Littleton is a victim of his own deception and his own insanity. The suggestion that he has been victimized by Michael Skakel and by law enforcment is preposterous, but that's the fiction that Lucianne Goldberg, Dominick Dunne and Mark Fuhrman have managed to sell to a public that loves a fairy tale. They are, after all, "Dorothy's
Angels" and the perception that justice is bering done, is very powerful when the family of the victim is misled. Dorothy Moxley is Martha's mother, and Dunne, Fuhrman and Goldberg have managed to turn her into a celebrity with angels.
The truth is easy to discover but it is frequently buried in a sea of unreliable gossip, and who has time to find the needle in the haystack? The truth is always a conspiracy, because when at least two people get together, one of them has a different opinion. Needless to say, propagandists have bastardized the word 'conspiracy' because every time that somebody challenges the advocacy of a propagandist, he or she is labelled a conspiracy theorist. Please appreciate the gimmick, because when reasonable people are called conspiracy theorists, it is a deliberate effort to block their capacity to expose the truth.
It is intersting to watch all the so-called 'victims rights advocates' like former Prosecutor, Nancy Grace, who spent a full hour discussing the Moxley murder, hosting Larry King live, and she shrewdly did not even mention the name Ken Littleton. Anybody wonder why Nancy Grace did not even mention the man who was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel, on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered? The stink of that omission is big enough to survive a lifetime, because it proves that Nancy Grace is not an advocate for murder victims. Nancy Grace is an advocate of the delusion that prosecuting an innocent man is worthwhile."
P.S. Since this was written, Ken Littleton has changed his story. This is the addendum:
On Tuesday 12 December, 2002, after Michael Skakel's conviction, Ken Littleton claimed that Michael Skakel had said, "I did it and you are going to get blamed for it." Ken Littleton was so definite that he even ascribed a motive for the unlikely killer. In his words: "Michael Skakel was on a multitude of drugs which caused his mind to be genetically altered and his behavior to be obstructed. Michael Skakel wasn't Michael Skakel at the time of the murder. It was the drug dealers who caused his mind to be altered and polluted."
The problem with this revision however is that it proved that Littleton perjured himself at Skakel's trial, where he testified that after Moxley's body was found, family advisers suddenly directed him to take Skakel, his siblings and a cousin to upstate New York, about two and a half hours away, where the Skakels had another home. Littleton said there had been no travel plans for that weekend until after the slaying was discovered. He said they stayed in Windham, N.Y., for the weekend and he never heard the children discuss the killing. Ken Littleton was reading the Fuhrman script.
As the witness for the prosecution, Ken Littleton DID NOT claim that Skakel had confessed to murder because that would have given Mickey Sherman the opportunity to cross examine him. Mickey Sherman was even denied the opportunity to cross examine Gregory Coleman, who overdosed on heroin, after producing a "court sanctioned" document with the alleged confession, "I am a Kennedy, I am going to get away with murder."
Ken Littleton borrowed Coleman's lie AFTER Skakel's conviction, and the fact that he did not promote the preposterous allegation in court because Mickey Sherman's cross examination would have exposed the truth, reflects the scam that is responsible for the prosecution of Michael Skakel.
The foundation of every inquiry, criminal or otherwise, is that a defendant is provided the opportunity to confront the source of the complaints against him, but Michael Skakel was fraudulently and or conveniently denied the opportunity -first by the death of Gregory Coleman and then by the perjured testimony of Ken Littleton.
Criminal investigator, David Sween, who exposed the flaws in the prosecutor's case, deserves the credit for "forcing" Ken Littleton to manufacture yet another alibi ["I did it and you are going to get blamed for it."] and thereby proved that this deceptive witness for the prosecution has consistently promoted the spin he requires to get away with murder. Michael Skakel is not the murderer and the perjuror. Michael Skakel is the victim because, to use his former tutor's words [but the names have been changed to protect the innocent] "Ken Littleton did it and Michael Skakel is going to get blamed for it." That is what happened.
The truth is always the same, but Ken Littleton constantly revises it in a very predictable manner, to cover up the fact that he murdered Martha Moxley. I hope this helps you understand why Ken Littleton changed his story and inadvertently betrayed the fact that he perjured himself at Skakel's trial, to create the false impression that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley. The people who are Littleton's apologists are very, very predictable, and in my opinion, they have run out of excuses.
HeilFhurman
Unregistered User
(6/27/03 7:23 pm) Reply
David Sween is a competent criminal investigator.
During the initial stages of the investigation, Mark Fuhrman over and over and over again on all sorts of tv programs told us that Scott's alibi did not fit the timeline. But alas!! That all changed when the bodies were found. Now the timeline is groovy with Mark. What a chump.
David Sween saved Scott's life. Candace is responsible for..
The prosecutor has obviously proved that he does not have enough evidence to justify holding Scott because all of the theories regarding Scott's role in the murder of Laci have been leaked and they have all been discredited.
Clearly, the only remaining option is to manifacture new evidence. Is that all that this delay is? Another opportunity to manufacture more evidence?
______________________________________________l
The prosecution intended to use Gloria Allred to prove that Amber Frey was a victim, but you can't really call a whore a victim. A whore like Amber Frey is clearly not Scott's motivation to murder Laci, and now that is is clear that the prosecution has no credible witnesses to implicate Scott, they have no case.
Ironically, Gloria Allred proved that Amber Frey was a whore, because loudmouth claims that she will do whatever it takes to protect Amber's reputation, but when Larry Filnt called Amber a whore, Gloria Allred's silence spoke volumes.
...protecting whores, liars and murderers.
Everybody in America knows that Amber Frey is a whore because Gloria Allred cannot sue Larry Flint for speaking the truth about Amber Frey.
ps. I hear Candace DeLong is looking for somebody else to pin the murder of Laci on, now that it is transparently obvious that Scott Peterson had absolutely nothing to do with her disappearance. Authorities sound desperate.
TomWilkinson
Unregistered User
(7/19/03 11:46 am) Reply
Great Link !
According to Tom:
"My opinion, if the truth is sensationalistic enough, malicious enough, juicy enough, scandalous enough, or exploitative enough, the the National Enquirer will print the truth. If the truth doesn't measure up to those lofty standards, they will embellish, distort, or fabricate."
That's not true. The National Enquirer recently claimed that Carolyn's drug use was responsible for the JFK Jr. plane crash. What's so sensational about that? The sensational truth is that JFK JR. was merely a victim of political opposition -he was assassinated, just like his father was. Whyt doesn't the National Enquirer post that -oh, it would be politically detrimental to their cause.
Sarah88
Unregistered User
(10/26/03 6:39 pm) Reply
GET OFF THE FRIGGING TV, MORONS...
IF I HEAR ONE MORE FORMER PROSECUTER ON TV TALKING ABOUT THE "COMPELLING CIRCUMSTANCIAL CASE" AGAINST SCOTT, I'M GOING TO PUKE, SCREAM AND BURST OUT LAUGH AT THE SAME TIME...
Sarah88
Unregistered User
(10/31/03 8:23 am) Reply
Oops...
I meant "burst out LAUGHING", sorry...
...Just because they are such hypocrites, like they say, "Oh, we don't know all the evidence... Well, there is SUCH a COMPELLING case against him..." Ugh.
The whole world will join you in laughter.
This is quite entertaining. I am an Attorney who posted messages on Court TV message boards, to illustrate the preposterous nature of the case against Scott Peterson. I thought I'd take a break from trial preparation today, to post another, much needed message on some of the exceedingly misleading threads that Court TV promotes. One such thread relies extensively on the National Enquirer, and repeatedly makes statements like "the National Enquirer got that right too."
I discussed the preposterous nature of the National Enquirer's "evidence" by referring to this brilliant analysis about the value of the National Enquirer's "reporting".
My comments have been erased and replaced by linking directly to the garbage that the National Enquirer publishes. I tried to point out this ludicrous practice to Court TV message board posters, but I have evidently been banned. Quite strange, but not surprising, given the fact that it is not possible to accuse Scott of murder unless one is gullible enough to believe in the National Enquirer, and the person who controls Court TV message boards, does not tolerate anybody who ridicules the garbage that the National Enquirer promotes.
Ugh, those Court TV posters make me sick...
Nothing against the network - it's a good one, I believe, but those posters on the boards are just evil.
To hear their comments about Scott, anyone even slightly questioning if he did it or not, and even his poor family are DISGUSTING, and CRUEL!! They should all be slapped.
Well, good luck, though, Lynn - hopefully someone can get this through to the posters over there, but they're all evil and unfair, like I said, so, who knows, you know...
David Sween exposes crackpots who are trying to frame Scott.
David Sween exposes crackpots who are trying to frame Scott.
Law enforcement has never demonstrated the need to investigate Scott Peterson. When LE found a loaded semi-automatic in Scott's truck, they didn't even test his hands for gun powder residue. Actually, that isn't exactly true. The Cross-Examination of Detective Brocchini is more specific:
Q. Now, and it was because of your having found the pistol that you were interested in doing the GSR test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And GSR is gunshot residue test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And Mr. Peterson presented his hand or hands for you to make those kind of swabs, whatever you do to do a GSR test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And so you did that test?
A. I did.
Q. And so you collected some kind of swabs?
A. Yes.
Q. And what did you do with those after that?
A. I booked them into evidence.
Q. Was anything ever done with them?
A. No.
Q. So they were never tested?
A. Not to my knowledge, unless they're done and I didn't know about it.
This is very strange testimony. A cynic would have to say the tests were done, they were negative, and so they 'lost' them.
Somebody who is more analytical would say that if Scott had shot Laci, the police would have called it a 'hard kill'. A realist would have to conclude that the tests were done, they were negative, and the police turned their attention to 'soft kill' speculation.
It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that Scott Peterson murdered his wife, given the fact that Detective Brocchini was not even concerned enough to prove or to disprove the claim that Scott Peterson shot Laci. Detective Brocchini is either incompetent, corrupt or he does not care to investigate the murder of Laci Peterson.
Right...
Like I said, I wouldn't believe in his "guilt" for a nanosecond. Hey - pretty good prosecution team, but why aren't they defence attorneys? THEY'RE GREAT AT PROVING REASONABLE DOUBT!!
One hair, which is now two and POSSIBLY Laci's, POSSIBLY not...
An affair or two...
A little of this, a little of that...
Yet no evidence of MURDER. I say they're pretty good at proving a man's innocence, don't you?! Their "evidence" is just nothing; I have yet to see one compelling peice of actual evidence against Scott... blood or something... a confession... AT LEAST A HAIR THEY CAN SAY FOR SURE IS LACI'S!! Damn! This would be laughable if it all weren't so tragic!
GET OFF THE FRIGGING TV, MORONS...
Oops...
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies