RickTurpin
Posts: 58
(3/7/04 10:42 am)
Reply
|
The bodies of Laci and Connor were planted.
719 Date: 2004-03-07 16:26:11
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
As I have repeatedly indicated, Scott did not dump his wife in the Bay, her body was deliberately planted, to implicate Scott Peterson.
If Scott had in fact murdered Laci and dumped her in the Bay, sonar searches would have located the body.
Indeed, a sonar search just recovered a man from Idaho, who was just located at the bottom of Auke Bay.
Visibility is not a factor in Sonar searches because experts measure a reflection of sound and not light. The only reason that Laci was not located is because she was not there, and that is probably because she was buried in a shallow grave.
Speculation aside, sonar searches failed to recover the body, and that is because there was no body to recover. It was obviously planted to implicate Scott Peterson, and that is clearly what sonar searches have proved.
718 Date: 2004-03-06 05:08:47
Bruno Jasienski ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Do not fear your enemies. The worst they can do is kill you. Do not fear your friends. At worst, they may betray you. Fear those who do not care; they neither kill nor betray, but betrayal and murder exist because of their silent consent.
717 Date: 2004-03-03 21:27:13
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Why does Judge Delucchi contradict himself? In his own words, "I'm persuaded the dog tracking in and around Modesto can't be corroborated'' said Delucchi. "You can't cross-examine the dog."
Delucchi, however, ruled that prosecutors will be able to present a separate piece of dog-tracking evidence that places Laci Peterson's scent at the very pier where her husband said he left for an afternoon of fishing on the day she went missing. The
jury will hear testimony from an expert dog handler whose Labrador retriever Trimble followed Laci Peterson's scent from the parking lot of the Berkeley Marina to the edge of the pier.
Court precedent requires corroboration of any dog-tracking evidence, Delucchi said, and called the marina evidence admissible because Scott Peterson admitted going to the marina, and Laci Peterson and her fetus washed ashore 2 1/2 miles from the marina four months later. What does that have to do with the need to follow Laci's scent?
Where is the corroboration? Did anybody see Laci at the Marina? Is Judge Delucci going to cross-examine the dog? This judge does not make any sense. First and foremost, the crap that Delucci has chosen to call evidence is straight out of the National Enquirer, and this is the direct quote: "And Trimble, another Lab tracking dog, produced the most compelling evidence against Scott. He showed that Scott left his warehouse in his truck, headed for the Berkeley Marina, and the dog picked up Laci’s scent – at the marina!"
Is Judge Delucchi going to cross-examine the dog?
Moreover, Delucchi has selectively excluded dog tracking evidence because Modesto police detective Al Brocchini called off a search even though a bloodhound named Merlin appeared to be following Laci Peterson’s scent, and that is not justifiable.
Where is the corroboration? Who saw Laci at the marina? Eyewitnesses corroborated the fact that Scott was at the marina, alone. This is extremely bizarre and presumptuous corroboration -like denying Merlin the tracking dog, the opportunity to follow Laci Peterson's scent. Delucchi's peculiar obsession to dismiss the fact that nobody saw Laci at the marina, not to mention the fact that she was witnessed walking her dog on December 24th, clearly indicates that the so called, "corroborated" dog-tracking evidence is nothing more than the bizarre theory that the National Enquirer publicized. That is not even what you call evidence, let alone, corroborated evidence.
716 Date: 2004-03-03 03:35:51
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Judge rules that the "evidence" published in the National Enquirer on January 6, is admissable ! LOL
Dogs tracked Laci's scent to a boat she had never been on. Fascinating ! Sounds like dogs don't know the difference between Scott and Laci's property, since Scott had handled it. For those who don't know the diff, that's called contaminated evidence --but what else do you expect from the National Enquirer? You would think that a judge would know better.
715 Date: 2004-03-01 21:45:35
John Ashcroft's Justice Department is involved? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"They have report after report after report of investigations that were taking place in December," Geragos said. "These items are negative for my client. I've got pages upon pages of hair comparisons that exclude my client at every single point."
Prosecutor David Harris said they were working with the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigations to turn over the reports.
"We're doing the best we can," Harris told Delucchi. "We're going up the chain and saying you need to get this done."
714 Date: 2004-03-01 16:14:28
Joe Sneider ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Oh Fred, you are so gentle with your leading questions, don't beat around the bush ! These idiots are trying to suggest that Scott Peterson made cement anchors, used them to sink Laci, and he just left one behind so that the geniuses can trace it back to Scott. These MORONS are so stupid, it will be a huge shock if the entire jury does not die laughing before this is over.
713 Date: 2004-03-01 15:38:19
Fred Sanfilippo ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The bodies of Laci Peterson and the baby were simultaneously recovered in April along the shores of San Francisco Bay, not far from where Scott Peterson was reported fishing on the day his wife vanished - Christmas Eve, 2002.
Who is gullible enough to believe that Scott Peterson directed the opportunity to frame himself?
712 Date: 2004-02-29 18:08:15
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The case against Scott Peterson has been aired in the National Enquirer and it does not belong in any court room where Kangaroo Justice does not prevail.
Mark Geragos does not need a defense to make it clear that it is not plausible to legitimately convict a man who has been cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. The slanderous and spurious allegations which are now called "the evidence" have been published in detail, in the National Enquirer and if this disinformation is to be pawned off to an unsuspecting jury, they need to be informed. And so, if the trial against Scott Peterson is to be fair, the judge must instruct the jury accordingly; "Members of the jury, I am supplying you with 10 issues of the National Enquirer. The theories of nine of the issues have been rejected by the prosecution because they made you all laugh. The January 6, 2004 issue is indisputable because the National Enquirer published a picture of Merlin the tracking dog, and THAT is what you call INDISPUTABLE evidence. If, in your infinite wisdom, you determine that the National Enquirer is a credible source, you must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you think that the National Enquirer is not credible, then Investigators like David Sween gets the last word."
This case is clearly over as far as the guilt or the innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned.
The judge in the Laci Peterson murder trial was supposed to be Richard Arnason, a retired Contra Costa County judge who was choseny by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George. Arnason is a well known, criminal law expert with extensive death penalty case experience and having served on the Superior Court of Contra Costa County for 31 years, he would never tolerate the tactics of prosecutors who are pretending to have a case against Scott Peterson. Needless to say, the prosecutors had to shop around, to find a judge who was willing to listen to a case that would have been thrown out a long time ago, if a reasonable judge like Arnoson was not replaced.
Clearly, any Judge who determines that the National Enquirer had showed probable cause that Scott Peterson had killed 27-year-old Laci, who was nine months pregnant, and dumped her body in San Francisco Bay, needs his head examined.
I know what I am talking about. In my experience, reasonable and fair Judges are irresponsibly replaced when prosecutors understands the weakness of their case.
Michael Cardoza, a criminal defense attorney in the San Francisco Bay area, thought that both the prosecution and the defense would approve of Arnason and every legal expert was shocked to hear he had been replaced.
"He does what's right and he controls his courtroom," said Cardoza, who tried a case before Arnason in 1998.
If the prosecution had a case, they would have accepted Arnason. Instead, they made sure he was disqualified because they [try not to laugh] claimed that an experienced and distinguished judge was biased against them.
Mark Geragos is understandably frustrated and angered by the kangaroo court that the prosecutors are seeking to construct for the sake of lynching Scott Peterson. The prosecution selected judge is even refusing to sequester the jury, and in this case, a jury that is not sequestered is subject to the manipulation that the Skakel jury was subjected to, when demagogues like Dominick Dunne dined within earshot of the jurors that lynched Michael Skakel. Needless to say, this prosecution is seeking an equally creative way to manipulate the Peterson jury; is that why they opposed the request to sequester the jury?
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said jurors will be allowed to go home each night with an admonishment not to discuss the case, "and we'll see what happens." We'll see what happens, if this selected fool who is supposed to be a judge, continues to preside over a kangaroo court.
I repeat; The case against Scott Peterson is OVER, because Scott Peterson, the most investigated man in America, has been absolutely cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. In the alternative, you can promote the so called credibility of the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, because every other issue has prompted widespread laughter --and now, it's just a matter of time... before the media rejects the latest fraud.
711 Date: 2004-02-29 15:44:47
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
By Kim Curtis
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:22 a.m. February 26, 2004
REDWOOD CITY – Laci Peterson's trail ended at the water's edge.
It began as a scent path picked up by police dogs, leading from Scott and Laci Peterson's Modesto home down the road to nowhere.
According to testimony this week by the dogs' handlers, Laci Peterson's scent was again picked up at a nearby warehouse that Scott Peterson rented and on a boat he had stored inside – the same boat prosecutors say he used to ferry his wife's body out into the San Francisco Bay.
_______________________________
Wow, Associated Press read the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, and it publishes it as "the news" for February 26, 2004. LOL
710 Date: 2004-02-28 14:04:07
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
When did the National Enquirer become the medium for who goes to jail and who does not?
Does the judge in the Scott Peterson case read the National Enquirer? For those with a low IQ, this is not a trick question !
www.geocities.com/botenth/national.htm
|
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies