Children Of the Earth and Sky
    > Announcements
        > This Just in...again
New Topic    Add Reply

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6

Author Comment
shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1022
(12/12/04 2:11 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
White House Said to Want Forests Thinned


Friday December 10, 2004 11:16 PM

COEUR D'ALENE, Idaho (AP) - The Bush administration plans to double efforts to thin fire-prone Western forests and will emphasize the cutting of trees that can be sold to help pay for the work, Agriculture Undersecretary Mark Rey said.

Along with increased thinning, the administration wants to reform the Endangered Species Act, streamline national forest management and give states more power in managing roadless areas, said Rey, who directs the nation's forest policy.

But Rey, speaking Thursday at the annual meeting of the Intermountain Forest Association, did not offer any details on exactly what type of Endangered Species Act reforms the president would support.

Last week the administration proposed cutting 80 percent of the federally designated critical habitat for threatened and endangered salmon in the Northwest.

``We're going to be active,'' Rey told the private gathering of about 75 Idaho political leaders and timber company officials. ``We're nowhere near the end of what we want to do.''

Since Bush took office in 2000, there has been a fourfold increase in the amount of national forest acreage treated to prevent wildfire. Last year about 4 million acres were treated with prescription burning or mechanical thinning, and the president wants to double that amount over the next couple of years, Rey said.

A majority of the thinned trees will be sold to sawmills, fuel pellet plants or biomass electricity generators, Rey said.

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1024
(12/14/04 12:39 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
The man Bush has appointed to take over Health and Human Services has NO health care experience,beyong his experience as Governor of Utah,an being involved with an insurance agency.Those of us who have medicaid,or medicare need to be aware-this guy is going to use a chainsaw to make his budget cuts.


       
White House - AP

Leavitt to Lead HHS, Could Cut Programs


By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Michael Leavitt, President Bush (news - web sites)'s choice to be secretary of Health and Human Services (news - web sites), may have to cut billions of dollars from the government's mammoth health programs for the elderly, poor and disabled to pare the budget deficit.

Data provided by Reuters
       

The Medicare and Medicaid programs, consuming nearly $500 billion a year and growing quickly, could be vulnerable in the context of last year's $413 billion budget deficit, the ongoing war in Iraq (news - web sites), costly domestic security commitments and administration plans to revamp Social Security (news - web sites) without raising taxes.

Bush selected Leavitt, the Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites) chief, on Monday, filling one of the last two openings in his second-term Cabinet. Bush praised Leavitt as a "fine executive" and "a man of great compassion ... an ideal choice to lead one of the largest departments of the United States government."

Leavitt, Utah's governor for 11 years before joining the administration in late 2003, would succeed Tommy Thompson if confirmed by the Senate.

Before becoming governor, he was chief operating officer of the Leavitt Group, a family insurance firm in which he maintains an investment worth between $5 million and $25 million, according to a financial disclosure report he filed in 2003.

The company owns 100 independent insurance agencies that sell supplemental Medicare policies, among other insurance products, according to company literature.

The Medigap policies account for less than 1 percent of company revenues, said Dane Leavitt, the president and CEO. He is Michael Leavitt's brother.

"I have never had a discussion with him on any of those topics and I don't anticipate having one," Dane Leavitt said.

Michael Leavitt also has small stakes in pharmaceutical makers Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., and in medical equipment maker Medtronic Inc. Each investment was worth less than $15,000, according to the 2003 disclosure.

White House spokesman Trent Duffy said, "We're confident that Gov. Leavitt will take the necessary steps to avoid any conflicts of interest."

Meanwhile, John Walters, the national drug policy director, plans to stay in his post, White House officials said.

Bush still must name a new head of the Homeland Security Department to take the place of Bernard Kerik, who abruptly withdrew Friday night, citing immigration problems with a family housekeeper.

"He himself said he should have brought it to our attention sooner," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. "Commissioner Kerik pointed out that this was a mistake."

After failing to disclose the nanny problem during an initial screening, Kerik acknowledged it during a subsequent vetting phase as he filled out a clearance form, McClellan said.

Among the names mentioned as possible candidates for the post are Asa Hutchinson, the department's undersecretary for transportation and border security; White House homeland security adviser Fran Townsend; White House deputy chief of staff for operations Joseph Hagin, and Robert Bonner, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Potential successors to Leavitt at EPA include Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne, who was a leading candidate before Leavitt's appointment; Douglas H. Benevento, executive director of the Colorado Department of Public Health (news - web sites) and Environment; David Struhs, head of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under Gov. Jeb Bush, and a brother-in-law to Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, and Barry McBee, former chairman of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.

At Monday's White House announcement, Leavitt, 53, thanked Bush for showing confidence in him, though he also said, "I feel a real sense of understandable regret" about leaving EPA.

       

He said the Department of Health and Human Services (news - web sites) plays a vital part in the lives of every American.

"I look forward ... to the implementation of the Medicare prescription drug program in 2006, medical liability reform and finding ways to reduce the cost of health care," Leavitt said.

Leavitt also has experience with the Medicaid program from his time as Utah governor. The Bush administration granted Utah a rules waiver that Leavitt said Monday resulted in health insurance for thousands of working families. Critics have said the waivers have produced minimal increases in Medicaid enrollment, but have cut benefits and increased costs to others who receive Medicaid.

The HHS secretary also oversees the Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites), the National Institutes of Health (news - web sites) and the Indian Health Service. In all, the agency has a budget of more than $500 billion and 67,000 employees.

If Congress undertakes serious budget cutting next year, Medicare and Medicaid would be unlikely to escape, senior Republican congressional aides said last week.

Ron Pollack, executive director of the consumer group Families USA and an administration critic, said the costs of Bush's second-term agenda coupled with his opposition to tax increases "points to Medicaid potentially taking a very large hit."

Dr. Mark McClellan, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, had been a leading candidate for the HHS job. He is the brother of the White House spokesman.

But Mark McClellan is overseeing the new Medicare prescription drug benefit, which takes full effect in 2006, and Bush was said to have been reluctant to take him from his post.

Leavitt shares Bush's enthusiasm for market-based approaches to fixing problems. Former HHS Secretary Donna Shalala, a Democrat, called him "a very skillful administrator and manager."

Leavit, a Mormon and father of five, moved to Washington in the past year with his wife, Jacalyn, and a son who is in high school.

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1025
(12/14/04 12:51 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
THIS IS A MUST READ!!!!

This is a blog,started by a journalist who found that he was being too censored ijn mainstream media.The subject of this page testified,UNDER OATH, that he was asked(and complied) to make software that could hack voting machines,and change votes.He also testified that the company he worked for had essentially "wiretapped" NASA computer modules,and sold the information they got from doing this,to China.And within the last couple of days,the head of NASA quits his job?Hmmmmm.ANyway,please read,and this is the link to the video footage of this guy,Curtis's testimony.Following the article are some of the comments from readers,to the article,I found them interesting,and though you might,as well.

BREAKING UPDATE!: CLINT CURTIS 'STUNS' JUDICIARY COMM HEARINGS IN OHIO WITH 'JAW DROPPING' SWORN TESTIMONY!

PUBLICLY NAMES FEENEY IN FRONT OF COMMITTEE AS ASKING HIM TO DEVELOP 'VOTE-RIGGING' SOFTWARE!

Testimony Described as 'Show Stopper'!
'Stunner', 'Jaws Dropped'!
Audible 'Gasps' heard in chamber room!

*** BRAD BLOG EXCLUSIVE! PLEASE CREDIT! ***

The BRAD BLOG has just received an exclusive first-hand account of Clint Curtis' sworn testimony (as reported earlier) to the Judiciary Committee Democrats holding hearings this morning in Columbus, Ohio on Election 2004 Voting Irregularities.

The software programmer, whose sworn affidavit was first reported by The BRAD BLOG, named Republican U.S. Congressman Tom Feeney (a Republican member of the Judiciary Committee!) as having asked him to create "vote-rigging" software when he was a Florida Congressman prior to 2000 elections!

Curtis was the only witness to be sworn in at today's hearings.

Here is the exclusive account as we've just received it by a very reliable BRAD BLOG source inside the committee hearings!

The following account may sound melodramatic but it is highly accurate.

None of these are quotes and represent my best recollection.

At apprx 1p, after a witness had finished, cliff arnebeck -- who had given a presentation some time before -- interjected and asked to call one more witness. He was given permission to do so. He said he was calling clint curtis.

Some of the audience literally gasped while others applauded. They clearly knew who he was.

Curtis stood at the front of room with arnebeck seated behind him. Curtis was about five to ten feet from the members of congress. At the front of the room, he placed his hand on a bible and was sworn. To my knowledge, he was the only witness sworn.

Arnebeck began a direct examination of curtis with basic questions, name, residence....

Then got to his qualifications.

Then, he asked curtis something like whether voting machines could be hacked. He said yes. Arnebeck asked him on what he based that opinion. He said because I wrote a program that could do it. Arnebeck asked when that happened. Curtis said feeney had asked him to design such a program at yang enterprises.

Jaws dropped. Tubbs jones and waters looked shocked.

Tubbs jones, waters and nadler asked questions. Waters asked him to repeat who asked him to do it. Congressman feeney, he said. Nadler asked him some questions, as did tubbs jones and a state senator.

Curtis was asked what he would conclude if there was such a substantial deviation btwn exit polls and actual results. He said he would conclude the election had been hacked. Gasps. Could have heard a pin drop.

In the end, curtis was very very convincing to everyone in attendance. He was a show stopper, a stunner. It was a really amazing moment.


MORE....

As we've previously reported since breaking our original exclusive story on the Curtis affidavit [PDF] last week (Key articles are linked in a box in our right sidebar) Curtis last week met privately with staffers on the Judiciary Committee as well as Senate staffers.

Wired Magazine revealed today in their article on Curtis that it was staffers in Sen. Bill Nelson's office with whom Curtis met last week in D.C.

Nelson oversees NASA in the Senate. Curtis had charged in his affidavit that an employee, Hai Lin Nee (a/k/a Henry Nee) with whom Curtis worked at Yang Enterprises, Inc. (YEI) had inserted "wiretapping routines" into programs that YEI had been contracted to create for NASA, among other companies (including the Florida Dept. of Transportation).

Nee was charged with shipping chips used in Hellfire anti-tank missiles to the Peoples Republic of China in March of this year, and has since plead guilty to one of those counts (more on Nee soon!)

At the time of the alleged October 2000 meeting at YEI when Curtis claims that Feeney asked him to create a "vote-rigging software prototype", Feeney was a member of the Florida Legislature, a corporate attorney for YEI, as well as being a registered lobbyist for the company.

Feeney was said to have been, at the time, the only registered lobbyist known to have been serving concurrently as a legislator in the 160 member Florida statehouse.

Shortly thereafter, Feeney became Speaker of the Florida Legislature.

In 2002 Feeney won a U.S. Congress seat in the newly created 24th Florida congressional district.

Feeney was the running mate to Jeb Bush during his first failed bid for Governor in 1994.

As we noted earlier, Wired Magazine article quotes YEI Attorneys as saying that Curtis was a "disgruntled employee", but does not note that the Attorney who made the statement is both a campaign contributor to Feeney, and, as well, is Feeney's former law partner in Florida.

As well, there seems to be little to indicate that Curtis was "disgruntled" with YEI or vice versa. He submitted his resignation in December of 2000 and stayed on, at YEI's request for an additional six weeks afterwards until a replacment could be found.

It has been reported YEI threw a "farewell party" for Curtis, and email correspondce that The BRAD BLOG has seen would indicate that employees -- including Nee -- missed Curtis a great deal in the months after he finally left the company.

...CONTINUING TO DEVELOP!...

UPDATE: Video of portions of Curtis' testimony now available online!

- Blogged by BradF on 12/13/2004 01:48:00 PM
15 Comments:

people of erf said...

Anybody got a design for a "TIN FOIL HAT" I might be needing one soon , but it will be a "PARTY HAT"
12/13/2004 01:24:30 PM
Firebrand said...

YAHOO! Go get em Brad...keep us informed.
12/13/2004 01:32:24 PM
maipenri@yahoo.com said...

Please tell me why it is so hard to get a video or audio clip of this hearing. What a closed hearing? I'm dying to hear it first hand. Thanks for your efforts Brad.
12/13/2004 01:45:44 PM
Blue Balloon said...

Cspan reported they were going to cover this hearing, then said there was a schedule change and that they would show it at 4:30pm Eastern. So far, nothing on.

Press Secretary Scotty must have exerted some pressure to keep this from getting out to national television.

/Bleh. Stay tuned to Brad; he'll be most likely to keep us up to date.
12/13/2004 01:53:02 PM
Adam said...

Everybody out there. Email or call C-span and say you DEMAND to have this story aired. They can't deny us if enough people demand it.
12/13/2004 02:02:23 PM
Ziggyczar said...

I've passed along your most recent posting to the "Tavis Smiley Show." Am in awe that main stream media has not made one mention of this dramatic event. Even if they thought Curtis a "nutcase," one would imagine this warrants mention. Fear, coupled with lack of information, allows those in power the greatest control. I concur with LouderLouder; we must speak out, loud and often.
12/13/2004 02:10:10 PM
Ziggyczar said...

This is for Adam:
I spoke to someone in archives at C-SPAN, who said it was covered last week, but was not covered today. This same person at C-SPAN said there were problems securing a meeting place, which made it difficult to provide coverage.
How convenient.
12/13/2004 02:22:49 PM
Adam said...

I think I just talked to the same guy. Really pisses me off. Please tell me SOMEBODY had cameras there.
12/13/2004 02:24:23 PM
The Liberal Avenger said...

Will this testimony become publicly available?

If not, why not?
12/13/2004 02:56:40 PM
VeeZee said...

Just read on Reuters that NASA Chief, O'Keefe is leaving his position. Wonder if there is any connection to the happenings of the Curtis story! Seems like a lot of changes going on in so many places.
Thanks Brad for staying with this Curtis story and keeping us all posted!
12/13/2004 02:59:49 PM
louderlouder said...

Way cool Brad, the smile is back. Man it's sweet... feeling hope again. KUDOs!!!

To those who would like to speak on the way to the streets, here's a good starting place: 69.9.171.129/contest.html

It's a web email app that looks up your district's Congressmen and Senator, then sends an email in your name stating your position on The Vote. I urge everyone to take advantage and tag your friends to do the same.

Beckerman has the above link on his site (fairnessbybeckerman.blogspot.com/) as well as some docs on todays events.

I'm running out of long distance minutes on my cell phone shaming the mainstream media into coverage. Lets all grab some air time whadd'ya think?

Thanks Brad!
Louder
12/13/2004 03:13:45 PM
BradF said...

Working to confirm whether Video was there, and if transcripts are available.

Will post here, of course, with details when I can get 'em!
12/13/2004 03:20:02 PM
SB said...

Good job Brad and Brad Team. I was afraid that you be a victim of Rove 'bait & switch' strategy. Keep proceeding cautiously. Screw 'mainline media!' We have started a 'multi-level news network'. It is growing fast. Stay safe guys!!
12/13/2004 04:21:01 PM
altxl21 said...

I was looking up some info on today's meeting, and the House Judiciary Comittee has a list of participants and witnesses here (pdf). Curtis isn't on the list. Any reason why?
12/13/2004 09:12:31 PM
BradF said...

Curtis was not to have been a witness. He was called unexpectedly up to testify by Cliff Arnebeck.

Just one of the reasons the whole event was such a stunner!

Video now available for you non-believer types out there ;-)

Edited by: shadeaux63 at: 12/14/04 12:58 am
shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1026
(12/14/04 1:54 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again

Christian Conservatives Turn to Statehouses
By NEELA BANERJEE

Published: December 13, 2004


Energized by electoral victories last month that they say reflect wide support for more traditional social values, conservative Christian advocates across the country are pushing ahead state and local initiatives on thorny issues, including same-sex marriage, public education and abortion.

"I think people are becoming emboldened," said Michael D. Bowman, director of state legislative relations at Concerned Women for America, a conservative Christian advocacy group based in Washington. "On legislative efforts, they're getting more gutsy, and on certain issues, they may introduce legislation that they normally may not have done."

It is on the state level "where most family issues are decided," Mr. Bowman said. And it is there that local advocacy groups hope to build quickly on the momentum from the election when legislatures convene in the new year.

In Texas, conservative Christians are backing an amendment to prevent human cloning, a measure that would also block the kind of cloning used in embryonic stem-cell research. In Georgia, advocacy groups hope to win approval this year of two measures limiting abortion, after redistricting helped Republicans take control of the state legislature. In Kansas, conservatives have won a majority on the State Board of Education, which is expected to introduce changes this spring to the high school science curriculum challenging the theory of evolution. And in Maryland, some black churches have joined with a white Republican state delegate to push for a ban on same-sex marriage.

"People were mobilized during the election and they're still mobilized," said Judy Smith, Kansas state director for Concerned Women for America, which is working to put a measure on the ballot in 2006 to amend the Kansas Constitution to ban same-sex marriage. "We would be stupid not to act now. This is exactly what we had hoped for."

Groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood cautioned that despite surveys of voters leaving the polls showing that President Bush was supported by 80 percent of those who listed "moral values" as their top concern, conservative Christians might not have gotten the mandate they say they have.

"It's important to underscore that there are large portions of the country that believe in gay rights and in a woman's right to choose," said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

While Christian conservatives say the most promising legislative and policy efforts are in states that went for Mr. Bush, they are also optimistic about ballot issues they are championing in traditionally Democratic states like Maryland. While Senator John Kerry won Oregon and Michigan, those states also passed amendments banning same-sex marriage, said Kristin Smith, legislative coordinator for state and local affairs at the Family Research Council, a conservative lobbying group in Washington.

Conservative Christians were active on some of these issues a year ago but largely switched their focus to getting out the vote in the months before the presidential election.

The legislative changes most conservative Christians seek are likely to be incremental - a tightening of parental notification on abortion, for example - mainly because legislators themselves tend to move cautiously, Mr. Bowman said. While the agenda varies from state to state and in some cases is still emerging, the initiatives generally have to do with abortion rights, same-sex marriage, embryonic stem-cell research, sex education and the teaching of evolution.

Christian conservatives on the national level, like Concerned Women for America and the Family Research Council, say that they have provided guidance but that the local initiatives are largely homegrown.

One state where liberals and conservatives expect a bold step is South Dakota, where conservatives were instrumental in unseating the Senate minority leader, Tom Daschle. Last year, the State Legislature passed a bill banning abortions, except when a woman's life is in danger or she might suffer irreparable harm.

The bill was vetoed by Gov. Mike Rounds, a Republican, because of imprecise language, liberal and conservative advocates said. The wording was changed accordingly, and the bill will probably be reintroduced and signed this time by the governor, they said. Kate Looby, the state director for Planned Parenthood, said conservatives might feel more confident this time because they expect Mr. Bush to appoint Supreme Court justices who will eventually overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a woman's right to an abortion.

"If Kerry had won, there would not be the momentum there for this bill," said Rob Regier, executive director of the South Dakota Family Policy Council, an affiliate of Focus on the Family, a national evangelical Protestant group.


Electoral victories at the state level have prompted Christian conservatives in many states to renew the fight for causes that had stalled earlier. In Georgia, redistricting helped give Republicans control of the State House of Representatives, said Patricia Chivers, director of government relations for Georgia Right to Life. With the State Senate and the governor's office already controlled by Republicans, the change in the House has given Ms. Chivers new confidence that the state can pass two anti-abortion bills that she said had languished in the House under the Democrats.

One bill requires a woman to wait 24 hours after asking for an abortion, when she is offered information on alternatives, risks and pictures of fetal development, and another requires minors who want an abortion to be accompanied by their parents or guardians. Now, other adults can escort minors.

In Kansas, conservatives now hold 6 of the 10 seats on the State Board of Education. All of them favor teaching theories that compete with or criticize evolution, said Jack Krebs, a member of the State Science Standards Writing Committee and vice president of Kansas Citizens for Science.

In 1999, the Kansas board voted to erase any mention of evolution from the state science curriculum, opening the door for the teaching of creationism. That was reversed in 2001, after three board members who supported the move were defeated in a Republican primary. Kathy Martin, a newly elected member of the board who favors teaching alternatives to evolution, said the board would probably take a different route this time, like introducing the teaching of "intelligent design," a theory that holds that the development of the universe and earth was guided at each step by an "intelligent agent."

Liberal advocacy groups say they plan to fight many of these efforts. But Mr. Romero of the A.C.L.U. said that beyond filing legal challenges, liberals needed to appropriate the language of morality from Christian conservatives to capture the popular imagination.

"Lawsuits are about telling stories, and we need to talk about why we picked this case and why it's important," he said. "For instance, we need to ask, where is the morality when a partner of 20 years is denied hospital access because a state doesn't believe in gay marriage? Where is the morality in forcing a teenage girl into a back-alley abortion?"

Conservative state officials, like Ms. Martin in Kansas, say they are responding to an increasingly vocal constituency that has already made up its mind about moral issues and wants to shape public policy.

State Representative Cynthia Davis of Missouri prefiled two bills for the next session of the Legislature that she said "reflect what people want." One would remove the state's requirement that all forms of contraception and their potential health effects be taught in schools, leaving the focus on abstinence. Another would require publishers that sell biology textbooks to Missouri to include at least one chapter with alternative theories to evolution.

"These are common-sense, grass-roots ideas from the people I represent, and I'd be very surprised if a majority of legislators didn't feel they were the right solutions to these problems," Ms. Davis said.

"It's like when the hijackers took over those four planes on Sept. 11 and took people to a place where they didn't want to go," she added. "I think a lot of people feel that liberals have taken our country somewhere we don't want to go. I think a lot more people realize this is our country and we're going to take it back."


Edited by: shadeaux63 at: 12/14/04 1:57 am
Gaia Angel 
ezOP
Posts: 2300
(12/15/04 5:56 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Updated: 10:33 PM EST
Cuts in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Urged
By CHARLES J. HANLEY, AP

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (Dec. 14) -- The world's chief climate scientist on Tuesday disputed the U.S. government contention that cutbacks in carbon dioxide emissions are not yet warranted to check global warming.

Experts readied a report, meanwhile, saying 2004 will be one of the warmest years on record.

''The science says you've got to reduce emissions,'' Rajendra K. Pachauri told The Associated Press in an interview midway through a two-week international climate conference.

The Kyoto Protocol, the international accord requiring cuts in carbon dioxide, ''is driven by the need to reduce emissions, and on that there is no question,'' said Pachauri, chairman of a U.N.-sponsored network of climatologists.

Scientists largely blame the accumulation of carbon dioxide and other ''greenhouse gases'' in the atmosphere for the rising temperatures of the past century.

The 10 warmest years globally, since records were first kept in the 19th century, have all occurred since 1990, the top three since 1998. Specialists here this week will issue a report saying 2004 ranks as the fourth- or fifth-warmest year recorded.

Conference delegates from dozens of nations are fine-tuning the workings of the Kyoto pact, which takes effect Feb. 16. It sets targets for 30 industrial nations - excluding the nonparticipating United States and Australia - to reduce emissions of six greenhouse gases, most importantly carbon dioxide, a byproduct of coal, oil and gasoline use.

The United States is a member of the umbrella U.N. treaty on climate change, and it signed that treaty's Kyoto Protocol in 1997. But President Bush renounced the Kyoto agreement in 2001, saying emission reductions would hurt the U.S. economy.

Before leaving for the annual climate-treaty talks, U.S. negotiator Harlan Watson told reporters in Washington that the United States - the world's biggest emitter of carbon dioxide - would eventually stop the growth in its emissions ''as the science justifies.'' After arriving here, he said the Kyoto Protocol's approach was ''not based on science.''

Asked about Watson's statements, Pachauri was emphatic.

''The science says you've got to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. The science says you've got to stabilize concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,'' he said. ''What may be subject to uncertainty and subject to debate is who is to reduce how much.''

As chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Indian scientist oversees the work of hundreds of specialists who regularly assess the latest research on climate change and its likely effects.

In its last major report, in 2001, the panel projected that global temperatures in the 21st century would increase by 3 to 10 degrees, depending on many factors, including how quickly and deeply gas emissions were cut back.

Warming is predicted to cause greater extremes in temperature, and possibly dry out farmlands, stir up fiercer storms and raise ocean levels, among other impacts, the panel said. At the conference Tuesday, European scientists said even an additional 2 degrees might threaten South American water supplies and reduce Asian food yields.

One of the world's leading climate institutes, the British government's Hadley Center, issued a report at the conference Tuesday on work done to narrow the uncertainties, by running many dozens more model scenarios through its supercomputers.

It said temperatures would most likely rise by an additional 5 degrees by later this century if the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere doubles from its pre-industrial levels - a probable scenario if emissions are not controlled.

Pachauri said the evidence of change is everywhere - in the doubling of extreme weather events recorded by the World Meteorological Organization, in the melting of glaciers worldwide, and in the one-degree global temperature rise of the past century.

''The evidence is so strong, the observations so strong, it's very difficult to close your eyes to it,'' he said. ''I was born in the mountains in India. I've seen the kinds of changes that have taken place with snow cover, with the seasons, with the extent of warming, precipitation patterns, the impact on forests.''


Delegations at the conference are searching for ways to bring the United States into the Kyoto process and acceptance of mandatory reductions in gases. Besides the economic argument, Bush complained that some poor but rapidly industrializing nations, such as China and India, were not obligated by Kyoto's short-term targets.

Pachauri said he was heartened by the actions of individual U.S. states, particularly in the U.S. Northeast, to impose carbon-dioxide reductions on power plants, for example.

''I think the next round of action will only come from an acceptance of the science,'' he said.


AP-NY-12-14-04 21:01 EST



shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1028
(12/15/04 2:29 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
December 13, 2004

Startling New Revelations Highlight Second Congressional Hearing Today.

www.freepress.org/departm...9/2004/985

Startling new revelations highlight rare Congressional hearings on Ohio vote by Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman December 13, 2004
Startling new revelations about Ohio's presidential vote have been uncovered as Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee join Rev. Jesse Jackson in Columbus, the state capital, on Monday, Dec. 13, to hold a rare field hearing into election malfeasance and manipulation in the 2004 vote. The Congressional delegation will include Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, and others.
Taken together, the revelations show Republicans - in state and county government, and in the Ohio Republican Party - were determined to undermine and suppress Democratic turnout by a wide variety of methods.
The revelations were included in affidavits gathered for an election challenge lawsuit filed Monday at the Ohio Supreme Court. Ohio's Republican Electoral College representatives are also to meet at noon, Monday, at the State House, even though the presidential recount, requested by the Green and Libertarian Parties, is only beginning the same day.
On Sunday, John Kerry spoke with Rev. Jesse Jackson and urged him to take an more active role in investigating the irregularities and ensuring a fair and impartial recount. Kerry said there were three areas of inquiry that should be addressed: 92,000 ballots that recorded no vote for president; qualifying and counting provisional ballots; and supported an independent analysis of the software and set-up of the optical scan voting machines.
What follows are excerpts from some of the affidavits for the election challenge.
- In Warren County, where election officers declared a homeland security emergency on Election Day, and barred reporters and others from watching the vote count, it now has been revealed that county employees were told the previous Thursday they should prepare for the Election Day lockdown. That disclosure suggests the lockdown was a political decision, not a true security risk. Moreover, statements also describe how ballots were left unguarded and unprotected in a warehouse on Election Day, and they were hastily moved after county officials received complaints.
- In Franklin County, where Columbus is located, the election director, Matt Damschroder, misinformed a federal court on Election Day when he testified the county had no additional voting machines - in response to a Voting Rights Act lawsuit brought by the state Democratic Party that minority precincts were intentionally deprived of machines. It now appears as many as 81 voting machines were being held back, out of 2,866 available, according to recent statements by Damschroder and Bill Anthony, the chairman of the Franklin County Board of Elections. The shortage of machines in Democratic-leaning districts lead to long lines and thousands of people leaving in frustration and not voting. Damschroder's contradictory statements raise the possibility of perjury.
- Also in Franklin County, a worker at the Holiday Inn observed a team of 25 people who called themselves the "Texas Strike Force" using payphones to make intimidating calls to likely voters, targeting people recently in the prison system. The "Texas Strike Force" members paid their way to Ohio, but their hotel accommodations were paid for by the Ohio Republican Party, whose headquarters is across the street. The hotel worker heard one caller threaten a likely voter with being reported to the FBI and returning to jail if he voted. Another hotel worker called the police, who came but did nothing.
- In Knox County, students at Kenyon College, a liberal arts school, stood in line for up to 11 hours, because only one voting machine was in use. However, at nearby Mt. Vernon Nazarene University, there were ample voting machines and no lines. This suggests the GOP shorting of voting machines was a more widespread tactic than just targeting inner-city neighborhoods.
- Reports in sworn affadavits affirm numerous instances of direct official interference with the right to vote. In Warren County, Democrats were being targeted and forced to use provisional ballots, even if they had proper identification. These ballots were then subjected to more rigorous standards to be counted than were other ballots. In a half-dozen precincts in Franklin County, people who were not inside polling places by 7:30 PM were told to leave - even if they had waited in line for hours. This is a violation of the Voting Rights Act. Sworn affidavits also confirmed reports of old voter rolls being used, meaning that new voters were not on the list and would be given provisional ballots, if allowed to vote at all.
Affidavits were also filed in support of the election challenge suit raising questions about manipulating exit poll results and computer tabulation of county and statewide votes.
In one exit poll affidavit, Jonathan David Simon, an expert witness, notes that at 12:53 a.m. the exit polls altered the projected winner - even though the same number of votes had been cast. "Although each update reports the same number of respondents (872), the reported results differ significantly, with the latter (12:53 a.m.) exit poll results apparently having been brought into congruence with the tabulated vote results." In other words, the exit polls were made to conform to a political decision to declare Bush the victor.
Another exit poll affidavit, filed by Ron Paul Baiman, an economist and statistician at the University of Illinois and University of Chicago, said the swing in national exit poll results, recorded at 12:33 a.m., when Kerry was winning with 50.8 percent of the vote, to Bush winning with 51.2 percent, was, "in lay terms, impossible."
"This is more than a 100 percent swing in the other direction of the exit poll margin, he said. "There is less than a one in 25,000,000 (1/25,507,308) chance of this occurring."
Another affidavit by Richard Hayes Phillips, a geomorphology Ph.D. from University of Oregon with a special expertise in spotting anomalous data, found dramatic examples of erroneous voting patterns - with votes taken away from Kerry - that can only be explained by computer manipulation.
For instance, in 16 precincts in Cleveland, he found votes that were shifted from Kerry to other candidates. In at least 30 precincts, there was ultra-low voter turnout reported - as low as 7.1 percent or 13.05 percent - and seven entire wards where total turnout was below 50 percent. He writes, "Kerry won Cleveland with 83.27 percent of the vote to 15.88 percent for Bush. If voter turnout were really 60 percent of registered voters, as seems likely based on turnout in other major cities of Ohio, rather than 49.89 percent as reported, Kerry's margin of victory in Cleveland has been wrongly reduced by 22,000 votes."
Phillips points to other counties where has says "there is compelling evidence of fraud." In Miami County early on election night, when 31,620 votes had been counted, and later, when 50,235 votes were counted, "Kerry had exactly the same percentage, 33.92 percent, and the percentage for George Bush was almost exactly the same, dropping by 0.03 percent from 65.80 to 65.77 percent. The second set of returns gave Bush a margin of exactly 16,000 votes, giving cause to question the integrity of the central counting device for the optical scan machines. "
He cites many other examples, but summarizes his findings: "It is my professional opinion that John Kerry's margins of victory were wrongly reduced by 22,000 votes in Cleveland, by 17,000 votes in Columbus, and by as many as 7,000 votes in Toledo. It is my further professional opinion that John Kerry's margins of defeat in Warren, Butler, and Clermont Counties were inflated by as many as 37,000 votes in the aggregate, and in Miami County by as many as 6,000 votes. There are still 92,672 uncounted regular ballots that, based upon the analysis set forth of the election results from Dayton and Cincinnati, may be expected to break for John Kerry by an overwhelming margin. And there are still 14,441 uncounted provisional ballots."
-- Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman are co-authors of OHIO'S STOLEN ELECTION: VOICES OF THE DISENFRANCHISED, 2004

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1030
(12/17/04 10:38 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again

       

Nearly Half in U.S. Say Restrict Muslims


By WILLIAM KATES, Associated Press Writer

ITHACA, N.Y. - Nearly half of all Americans believe the U.S. government should restrict the civil liberties of Muslim Americans, according to a nationwide poll.

       

The survey conducted by Cornell University also found that Republicans and people who described themselves as highly religious were more apt to support curtailing Muslims' civil liberties than Democrats or people who are less religious.

Researchers also found that respondents who paid more attention to television news were more likely to fear terrorist attacks and support limiting the rights of Muslim Americans.

"It's sad news. It's disturbing news. But it's not unpredictable," said Mahdi Bray, executive director of the Muslim American Society. "The nation is at war, even if it's not a traditional war. We just have to remain vigilant and continue to interface."

The survey found 44 percent favored at least some restrictions on the civil liberties of Muslim Americans. Forty-eight percent said liberties should not be restricted in any way.

The survey showed that 27 percent of respondents supported requiring all Muslim Americans to register where they lived with the federal government. Twenty-two percent favored racial profiling to identify potential terrorist threats. And 29 percent thought undercover agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer organizations to keep tabs on their activities and fund-raising.

Cornell student researchers questioned 715 people in the nationwide telephone poll conducted this fall. The margin of error was 3.6 percentage points.

James Shanahan, an associate professor of communications who helped organize the survey, said the results indicate "the need for continued dialogue about issues of civil liberties" in a time of war.

While researchers said they were not surprised by the overall level of support for curtailing civil liberties, they were startled by the correlation with religion and exposure to television news.

"We need to explore why these two very important channels of discourse may nurture fear rather than understanding," Shanahan said.

According to the survey, 37 percent believe a terrorist attack in the United States is still likely within the next 12 months. In a similar poll conducted by Cornell in November 2002, that number stood at 90 percent.

Edited by: shadeaux63 at: 12/18/04 12:24 pm
shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1031
(12/18/04 12:28 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Now,THIS is no surprise.


Energy Firms Lavish Funds on Inauguration

Sat Dec 18, 2:02 AM ET
       
By PETE YOST, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - More than $4.5 million from the corporate world has flowed to President Bush (news - web sites)'s inauguration fund, much of it from the energy industry and some of its executives in contributions of $250,000 each.


Outside the energy sector, New Orleans Saints football team owner Tom Benson gave $50,000 and his companies gave $200,000, the fund reported Friday.

Northrop Grumman Corp., the world's largest shipbuilder and second-largest U.S. defense contractor, donated $100,000.

Michael Dell, chairman of Dell Inc., the world's largest personal computer maker, gave $250,000. So did United Technologies, maker products ranging from escalators to aircraft engines.

Investment banking firm Stephens Group Inc. of Little Rock, Ark., gave $250,000. And the education loan firm Sallie Mae gave $250,000.

Occidental Petroleum Corp., whose business stands to benefit from the president's actions concerning Libya, donated $250,000, as did Exxon Mobil, the world's largest publicly traded oil company. Exxon Mobil reported record third-quarter profits, thanks to higher prices for oil and natural gas.

In April, Bush took steps to restore normal trade and investment ties with Libya, enabling four American oil companies, including Occidental, to resume commercial activities there after an 18-year absence.

Bush's action was a reward to Moammar Gadhafi for eliminating his most destructive weapons programs.

Other donors from the energy sector included Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens, who gave $250,000; and former Enron President Richard Kinder, who left the firm five years before it collapsed and now is CEO of one of the largest energy transportation and storage companies in the country. Kinder also gave $250,000.

Energy provider Southern Co., which owns utility companies in Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Mississippi, gave $250,000.

The Nuclear Energy Institute, the policy organization of the nuclear industry, gave $100,000.

___

narshaadha
Moderator
Posts: 496
(12/18/04 1:09 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
You are right, that was no surprise, shadeaux.
Back to the restricting muslims info you posted previously, is there a site where someone like me could go and send a letter of protest?

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1034
(12/19/04 12:11 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
I don't know,Narshaada.So far,it's only the opinion of a bunch of people.Unfortunately,those in office tend to listen to radical opinions these days.Just like those who are demanding that retailers say Merry Christmas to them,instead of Happy Holidays.Here,in Raleigh,it's working.

The best advice I can give about the restriction of Muslims rights is, Write to every politician you can think of,both local,and national,and let them know you find the results of this poll to be appalling,and you hope they never take it seriously.Remind them of the Japanese "camps" we at one time forced our Japanese-Americans into,as well as the parallels to the Nazi concentration camps.

IF they ever did take these opinions seriously,which I firmly hope they don't,they would feel justified to take whatever measures they felt justified to take,which could very well lead to the those same type of "camps" for Muslims of all nationalities,living here in the US.

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1035
(12/19/04 12:12 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Emmaus grad speaks against war in Iraq
Michael Hoffman spent two months there with Marines.

By Randy Kraft
Of The Morning Call

If you have one of those magnetic ''support our troops'' ribbons on your car, Michael Hoffman suggests you grab a marker and add a few words: ''Bring them home now.''

Hoffman, who graduated from Emmaus High School in 1997, returned to the school Thursday night to speak out against the war in Iraq.

''Being against the war is the only way to be for the troops,'' said Hoffman. ''We're doing them no good by sending them over there.''

The 25-year-old Marine veteran is a co-founder of Iraq Veterans Against the War, a 5-month-old organization that claims 150 members, including some on active duty in Iraq. It wants the immediate withdrawal of all occupation forces from Iraq, ''real'' reconstruction aid for that country and properly funded and administered veterans' benefits.

''I need to make sure this stops,'' he said. ''The honest truth needs to be told in order for this war to end. We've got to get these guys home now before another guy is killed on either side.

''This war would be over right now if people really understood the horror of it.''

Like Vietnam, said Hoffman, the only way to end the war will be for millions of Americans to get out on the streets every week and demand that it end.

More than 80 people attended the program, sponsored by the school's chapter of Amnesty International. Hoffman spoke for nearly 90 minutes, taking questions from the mostly supportive audience for most of that time.

He said the primary reason we're fighting in Iraq is to get its oil. He maintained the war was never really about finding weapons of mass destruction, capturing Saddam Hussein or establishing democracy.

Hoffman served in Iraq for nearly two months during the invasion last year. He helped aim a battery of 155mm howitzers at targets 10 to15 miles away. He never was told what they were shooting at, only given coordinates. His battery fired about 700 rounds a day, pounding its way across the country.

''Artillery is nameless and faceless,'' said Hoffman, adding he's haunted every day, wondering: ''Who did I kill?'' He knows he helped to kill innocent Iraqis.

''We haven't learned the lessons from Vietnam,'' said Hoffman. ''Most of our enemies are average Iraqis fighting back against this occupation. We have violated their sovereignty.''

If another country invaded the United States, bombing and killing innocent women and children who had nothing to do with the war until their lives were taken, ''wouldn't we all be up in arms defending our country?''

He claimed the majority of troops on the ground in Iraq feel ''we shouldn't be there. They don't see the point. We're not doing any good.'' A member of the audience disagreed, saying the military overwhelmingly supported Bush in the last election.

Hoffman said Bush went to war before the military was properly equipped. He said the administration has disregard for people who are willing to serve.

He said American soldiers are fighting only to protect their lives and the lives of their friends because someone is shooting at them.

Hoffman is the son of Rick and Susan Hoffman of Macungie. His father, who videotaped his appearance, said he is proud of his son both because of what he is doing now and because he served in a war he did not believe in.

Michael Hoffman said the United States should not abandon Iraq, but should end the military occupation. He said Iraqis can establish democracy, if they want it and if we ''stop occupying them and trying to do the job for them.''

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1036
(12/19/04 12:23 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Which species is next? I was incredibly saddened to read this,knowing that the Bush administration is doing all it can to gut the Endangered Species Act.If you read nothing else of this article,read the final paragraph,where it talks about Hawaii's budget for saving thier endangered species.It's an eye opener.

Aloha, Po'ouli: Farewell to a Hawaii Native We Will Never Meet Again
By LAWRENCE DOWNES

Published: December 19, 2004

       
        ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article         E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format         Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles         Most E-Mailed Articles
       

       

READERS' OPINIONS

.         Forum: Join a Discussion on Today's Editorials
       

        TIMES NEWS TRACKER
       
       
Topics        
Alerts        
        Hawaii       


       
               
        Fish and Wildlife Service       


       
               
        Endangered and Extinct Species       


       
               
        Environment       


       
                       
       
Track news that interests you.       


The people who try to save endangered species in Hawaii are immune to despair. They have to be, to keep doing what they do. They dangle on ropes from 3,000-foot sea cliffs on Molokai to brush pollen on a flower whose only natural pollinator - some unknown bird or insect - has died out. They trudge into remote forests to play taped bird calls, hoping that a survivor of a vanished species will reply. Or they capture and tend one small bird, old for its kind and missing an eye, then spend fruitless months searching for another to be its mate.

That bird, a po'ouli, the last known member of its genus and species, died in its cage on Maui on Nov. 26. The news, briefly noted in the papers, was another milestone in a long-running environmental catastrophe that is engulfing the islands.

Hawaii does not look like an ecological disaster area. It's too lush and sunny, too green and blue. But the state's natural splendor masks a brutal, often desperate battle against extinction. The islands' native animals and plants, many found nowhere else in the world, evolved in splendid isolation for millenniums. But in the two centuries since Captain Cook, their numbers have plunged. Of the more than 1,200 animals and plants on the federal list of threatened and endangered species, one-fourth - 317 - are Hawaiian.

Development, disease and predation have taken a ruinous toll. Aggressive invaders like rats, mongooses, pigs, mosquitoes and habitat-choking exotic plants now dominate the lowlands. Many endemic species have retreated up the mountains, clinging to patches of protected land - islands within islands.

One such refugee was the po'ouli, a shy, nearly silent brown bird with a black face that lived on the upper slopes of the Haleakala volcano, climbing tree trunks and eating insects and snails. The species was not discovered until 1973, when it was already in a death spiral. In 30 years its numbers fell from a few dozen to three. The other two are feared dead, though teams continue to trek through the dense forest, hoping.

Wildlife biologists everywhere are accustomed to hard work and heartbreak, of course. In many states it's a race to save habitat from sprawl, as government agencies wage political struggles and cut deals with private landowners and commercial interests in rear-guard actions to spare the marbled murrelets and spotted owls of this world from oblivion. In Hawaii the battle is literal and immediate - to destroy or deter invaders. Two of these are the ecological equivalents of nuclear bombs: the brown tree snake from Guam and the West Nile virus, either of which could decimate native birds with appalling speed. Neither has gained a foothold yet, thanks to luck and frantic prevention efforts.

The po'ouli's demise is a signal that Hawaii's imperiled species have received nowhere near the attention and money needed to match the immensity of the problem. Teams of biologists from federal and state agencies and private organizations manage species-protection programs with budgets totaling in the mere hundreds of thousands of dollars, cobbling together grants and annual allocations that are continually subject to being cut off, and begging for private donations of money and time.

They make do with slivers of federal pork, and yearn for someone in Hawaii's four-member Congressional delegation to take up the cause more loudly. The federal Fish and Wildlife Service, which recently cut funding for the tree-snake interception efforts on Guam, has 49 other states to deal with, and getting the Bush administration to push for a major increase in the agency's budget seems beyond hope.

Gov. Linda Lingle of Hawaii proudly points to her budget request for $4 million to fight invasive species, noting that this unimpressive sum is larger than any the state has spent before. The state, in fact, has starved its Department of Land and Natural Resources, which operates on less than 1 percent of the state's $7.9 billion operating budget and, according to an analysis by Environment Hawaii, an advocacy group, recently had a grossly disproportionate share of staff positions eliminated in a cost-cutting drive.

For doses of optimism, it helps to talk to biologists in the field. They point to progress in reforesting pastureland and the surprising adaptability of some native birds. A modest amount of money can go a long way, they say, since Hawaiian species live in tight quarters - wildlife refuges cover mere thousands of acres, making it a relatively manageable job to fence out intruders.

Those who have made do with so little say they could do much more. The captive-breeding program that tried desperately to save the po'ouli, run by the San Diego Zoo, has had several other successes, hatching and rearing the 'alala, or Hawaiian crow, which is extinct in the wild, and the state bird, the nene goose. Dozens of puaiohi, small thrushes, have been returned to the Alakai swamp on Kauai.

But the federal portion of the program's $920,000 budget has been cut for the 2006 fiscal year, from $550,000 to zero. Where the money might come from to keep the program going is anybody's guess.

The po'ouli's quiet struggle to survive is over. There is no time for silence about the struggles that remain.


shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1037
(12/19/04 12:44 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
This one is very long,but well worth the time it takes to read it.This is what this country is in for,now,and in the future.

December 15, 2004
Soldier's heart
B Y D A N F R O S C H


Thousands of Iraq war veterans will come home to face serious psychological problems-- and a system that's not ready to help them.


The first time Kristin Peterson's husband hit her, she was asleep in their bed. She awoke that night a split second after Joshua's fist smashed into her face and ran, terrified and crying, to the bathroom to wipe the blood spurting from her nose.



When she stuck her head back into the bedroom, there he was--punching at the air, muttering how she was coming after him and how he was going to kill her. Kristin started yelling but Joshua's eyes were closed. He was still asleep.

The next morning Joshua saw the dried blood on his wife. "Oh God," she recalls him saying. "I did that."

Peterson doesn't remember the night or the nightmares. He also can't remember punching his wife again in his sleep a few weeks later, this time driving her front tooth through her lip, all the while murmuring how he'd never go back.

For six months last year, Peterson helped build an oil pipeline across Iraq as a specialist in the Army's 110th Quartermaster Company. On the same highway where Private Jessica Lynch was ambushed, he saw Iraqi soldiers, dead and rotting, dangling out of their tanks. One time Peterson's truck broke down and he was surrounded by a group of Iraqi children, some throwing rocks, others toting AK-47s. "I kept thinking, 'God, I can't handle this,'" the 24-year-old says with a hollow laugh.

Since Peterson came back to Richmond Hill, Ga., in August 2003, these memories have turned him into a man Kristin often doesn't recognize--a man who lashes out in anger at her and their 21-month-old son, whose awful dreams tell him to beat his wife because, in his sleep, she's an Iraqi.

There are thousands of Operation Iraqi Freedom soldiers across the country like Joshua Peterson. They are coming home with minds twisted by what they've seen and done in Iraq.

A December 2003 Army study published in The New England Journal of Medicine found that approximately 16 percent of soldiers returning from Iraq were suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a psychologically debilitating condition causing intense nightmares, paranoia and anxiety. But that study is already out of date.

Now, after a particularly bloody summer and fall, many military and mental health experts predict the rate of PTSD will actually run nearly twice what the Army study found, approximately the same level suffered by Vietnam veterans. Others think it could spike even higher and note that rarely before has such a dramatic rate of PTSD manifested so early.

At the same time, there is mounting concern over the system designed to help: The Department of Veterans Affairs. Numerous reports show the VA does not have many of the essential services veterans desperately need.

"I don't know how many people are going to be seeking treatment, or whether the demand is going to be met by available resources," acknowledges Matthew Friedman, executive director of the VA's National Center for PTSD. "What I am confident is that people who come for treatment will get good treatment."

Yet the VA chronically has under-funded mental health programs and currently projects a $1.65 billion shortfall in those programs by the end of 2007.

"If we don't give the VA what it needs immediately, the consequences will be lifelong and devastating," says Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resource Center.

The emerging scenario is that of a generation of new veterans whose psyche is in tatters, their families scarred by the strangers their loved ones have become--and of an exhausted health care system holding its breath.

When you kill someone in combat, two things can happen," says Sgt. Walter Padilla, Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 12th Infantry Division. "The crazy ones go crazier. Or nothing happens."

In October 2003, Padilla was commanding a Bradley fighting vehicle near the city of Kirkuk, rounding up insurgents and fending off mortar attacks.

On a break one day, Padilla's company headed to a deserted area a few miles from base to practice their marksmanship. When gunfire rang out from a nearby village, Padilla wheeled his Bradley around to investigate. He saw two groups of armed men arguing over a pile of wood. The Bradley rumbled closer and the men began shooting. "Everything slowed down. I lost sense of time. I saw nothing, felt nothing," he says. "Then I opened up with the machine gun."

After Padilla gripped the trigger long enough, he moved in for a closer look.

"You're walking up on something you've done with your hands. You see the back of brains blown out. You know it's either him or you! But, I'd never seen anybody dying."

When Padilla's unit was shipped back to Fort Carson, Colo., in late February 2004, his life unraveled.

While he was gone his wife had filed for divorce. He began having terrible dreams about Iraq. He grew paranoid anytime he left home.

One morning on his way to work at Fort Carson, Padilla glimpsed the lights of an Air Force jet. He swerved his car off the highway and grabbed his cell phone to call his commanding officer--"I thought it was a tube flash from a mortar," he says.

At a bar one night, he argued with a stranger over a pool table--"Doesn't this guy know I've fucking killed people?" Padilla thought incredulously.

That night, Padilla lay awake, contemplating whether he should rush out into the night and search for the stranger. He shoved some sleeping pills in his mouth and fought to let it go. "If I'd have found him, I would have beat him over the head with a bar stool," he says.

While Padilla grasped at his ghosts, Washington bureaucrats were hearing about another nightmare. On March 25, 2004, Dr. James Scully, medical director of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), testified to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on VA, HUD and Independent Agencies.

A Navy veteran, Scully reported a 42 percent explosion in VA patients with severe PTSD, with only a 22 percent increase in money spent on PTSD services. The discrepancy was particularly startling, he said, because there were more vets using the VA for psychological help than ever--nearly half a million.

It was the latest blow for an institution that has struggled for decades to fulfill its mission.

A mammoth, federally funded agency, the VA's health care system began treating veterans in 1930, charging a sliding fee based on a variety of factors. But in the wake of the first Gulf War, the system swelled out of control. The soaring cost of civilian health insurance, combined with aging World War II, Korea and Vietnam vets, pushed droves of service people toward the VA, where everything was cheaper.

In 1995, the VA began realigning its health care system, opening hundreds of outpatient clinics. Yet by 2001, only half provided mental health services, according to the National Mental Health Association (NMHA).

Again, funding was a factor. By 2003, the previous decade had seen a 134 percent jump in vets seeking care, with only a 44 percent increase in the budget.

In April 2003, as U.S. troops pushed toward Baghdad, Dr. Joseph T. English, chairman of St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Centers of New York, told the House Appropriations Subcommittee on VA, HUD and Independent Agencies that veterans were waiting an average of 47 days to get into PTSD inpatient programs and up to a year at some outpatient facilities.

VA Secretary Anthony Principi (who submitted his resignation on Dec. 8 as part of the Bush Administration's cabinet shuffle) had commanded a Navy gun boat during Vietnam and understands PTSD. He also knew that with combat-dazed vets beginning to trickle home from Iraq, he needed to move. He commissioned a task force to cobble together the VA's mental health services on short notice.

In a revealing June 3, 2004, memo to VA Undersecretary for Health Dr. Jonathan Perlin, Principi wrote that the task force had discovered four major deficiencies: mental health services were scattered; substance abuse programs had been reduced; the VA's mental health leadership hadn't been diligent in overseeing the situation; and there was no coherent mental health strategy. Principi ordered VA brass to begin plugging the holes immediately.

While the VA worked on a long-term mental health plan to implement the reforms, the agency's Special Committee on PTSD delivered an October report to Congress, warning that with more soldiers with PTSD arriving home, services needed beefing up. During the 1980s, the VA had recommended there be teams of PTSD counselors at all VA medical centers. Two decades later, the report noted, barely half of the 163 facilities had them.

The VA plan estimated it would take $1.65 billion by 2008 to fix things.

Similarly, the PTSD committee conceded that the VA couldn't be expected to treat psychologically troubled vets from Iraq and Afghanistan while still caring for those already in the system. "If the human cost of PTSD and its related disorders is staggering, so are the long-term medical costs to the VA associated with chronic PTSD," the report stated.

The House Veterans Affairs Committee urged Congress to pump an additional $2.5 billion into the Bush administration's VA health care budget for 2005. But by November, with the budget poised for passage, it seemed unlikely, despite the warnings from veterans groups and VA doctors who sat on the PTSD committee.

These same doctors knew they could treat the disorder better than anyone. They have been on the cutting edge of PTSD since its diagnosis was born from a war whose lessons now seemed distant.

Sgt. Dave Durman did a tour in the Mekong Delta back in 1969. He was 18 and had joined the Navy the minute he got his draft notice, even though some of his buddies had already gone and died there. "I think it was because I just really loved the water," Durman says.

Durman also loved working on the supply ship where he was stationed and the pulsing adrenaline whenever his unit supported the Marines on missions around the South Vietnamese coast. He loved it all so much that he stayed in the Navy for nine years and, in 1995, joined the Virginia National Guard's 1032nd Transportation Company, 10 miles from his home in Kingsport, Tenn.

In February 2003, Durman's unit was sent to Kuwait. He was 52 years old.

Two months later, the 1032nd crossed into Iraq, charged with shipping supplies from the southern city of Talil, 300 miles north to Balad. Other convoys had been attacked on the same route, so Durman and the 19-year-old soldier who rode with him slung their flack jackets protectively over the outside of both truck doors because, Durman says, "you could stab a hole through those doors with a knife."

During one August haul, Durman came upon a group of Iraqi police who had just shot two children for stripping a car on the side of the road. He drove right by their bodies. "We're told not to interfere with domestic affairs," Durman says quietly. "I didn't want to get personally close to the Iraqis, because I knew we might have to shoot them. ... I'd look into their eyes and they all looked like gooks."

In September, Durman's unit shipped back to Virginia. It was then the nightmares started, about Iraq, but also things he'd buried--his abusive childhood, Vietnam.

His girlfriend, Teresa A. McKay, noticed that Durman, once confident and kind, now broke into random sweats and angered easily. He drank too much whiskey and bought a 357 pistol. Their sex life, McKay said, went "190 degrees different."

To McKay, a former nurse who'd worked with homeless Vietnam veterans, Durman's behavior looked disquietingly familiar.

Indeed, Vietnam provides the clinical and historical framework for PTSD and Iraq. Before Vietnam, treatment of a soldier for the psychological effects of battle was not really treatment at all, even though PTSD had long been acknowledged under a variety of names.

In 1871, former Union Army medic J.M. Da Costa wrote about a stress disorder caused by heavy fighting. He called it "irritable heart," a name changed shortly thereafter to "soldier's heart."

During World War I, according to VA psychiatrist Jonathan Shay, veterans returning home with soldier's heart were told by military doctors they had "shell shock," or "combat neurosis."

After World War II, says Shay, when tens of thousands of soldiers were hospitalized with psychiatric problems, doctors diagnosed the majority with paranoid schizophrenia.

"The diagnostic spirit which prevailed was based on Plato's idea that if you had good parentage, good genes, a good education, then no bad things could shake you from the path of virtue," Shay says.

During Vietnam, that Platonic ideal began to shift. In 1970, 20 young vets from the group Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) called psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton to speak with them about the war. The vets didn't trust the VA or the military, but knew they needed to calm the devils they'd brought home.

Lifton, who had studied Hiroshima survivors and been an Army psychiatrist, began meeting in New York with the group in what became known as rap sessions. He was shocked by the extent of the veterans' traumas.

"These men talked about a particular combat situation that had a level of extremity which was new, even to me," Lifton says.

Prompted by the rap sessions, VVAW opened up dozens of storefront counseling centers--places where Vietnam veterans could speak with other vets about their experiences, a crucial part of treating PTSD.

Still, despite the growing number of vets clearly suffering, the VA wouldn't accept PTSD as a diagnostic entity.

"This was because many of them were talking about atrocities, and that process was associated with a political view of the war," Lifton says.

Finally, in 1979, the VA opened up its own network of storefront vet centers. A year later, the American Psychiatric Association recognized PTSD as a legitimate medical diagnosis.

When the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study concluded in 1988 that 30 percent of Vietnam vets suffered from PTSD, not many were surprised.

By then, Lifton (who never worked for the VA) and individual VA psychiatrists like Matthew Friedman had become leading experts on PTSD and pushed the condition into psychiatric and public consciousness.

Through group and individual therapy, and sometimes medication, the VA was helping veterans heal, though the process could take years.

But by the time U.S. soldiers touched Iraqi soil, because of the VA's enormous growth and failure to catch up, the advancements in PTSD treatment were being compromised.

A new conflict, which bore an uneasy resemblance to Vietnam for the doctors who knew that war's demons, would test those advancements even further.

As Crystal Luker tells it, May 5, 2004, was the day her husband's platoon ran into trouble.

As usual, on that afternoon Specialist Ron Luker was patrolling a section of Baghdad with his 1st Cavalry Division platoon.

"There was a lieutenant in the first Humvee, Ron was in the second and his platoon sergeant was in the third with a group of privates," Crystal says.

A 19-year-old specialist from Tulsa named James Marshall, whom Ron had been looking after, also rode in the third Humvee. As the convoy snaked through a teeming Baghdad street market, there was an explosion.

"The lieutenant was yelling over the radio for all of them to haul ass back to the base because they were coming under fire," Crystal says.

When Luker looked behind him, he was horrified. The third Humvee was gone. He quickly turned his vehicle around and hurtled back down the street.

Crystal says Luker told her when they found the Humvee, the force of the blast had blown the flesh from two of the privates all over the seats. When Luker looked in the back, he saw Marshall wrapped around the vehicle's 50 caliber gun.

"When Ron tried pulling James's body out, his hands just went right inside of him. He pulled James's flack jacket back and his chest was gone."

Before that day, Luker called and wrote home religiously, unburdening himself to the woman he'd fallen in love with at a Mariposa, Calif., restaurant four years earlier. But when he came home to Fort Hood, Texas, for a week in August, things changed dramatically.

That first night at a welcome home barbecue, Luker cornered his wife in the kitchen.

"He asked why I'd been avoiding him and said that I didn't want to be around him," Crystal says. When Luker started cursing, some Army friends pulled him away. "You didn't come all the way home to fight with your wife," they told him.

As the week went on, there was more arguing. Crystal says her husband accused her of cheating while he was gone. He rifled through her purse, the bedroom drawers, and repeatedly listened to old phone messages, searching for proof.

"I told him, 'You're scaring me! You're not acting right, Ron!'" Crystal says.

Luker also seemed bothered around his three daughters. In an emotional revelation, he told his wife why.

"He said he'd turned into a monster in Iraq. How he couldn't bounce his kids on his knee when he'd shoved guns in women's faces and busted into houses and pushed kids on the floor. He kept saying, 'I'm just trying to remember who I was before.'"

Ron Luker's problems fit into those of the growing numbers of PTSD soldiers. They also signal another trend--soldiers experiencing PTSD early.

VA psychiatrist Scott Murray says many vets won't feel symptoms of PTSD until 15 months from now.

"This early on, PTSD is much higher than anything we've seen in previous conflicts," Murray says. "We anticipate the numbers are only going to keep getting higher."

Psychologist Kaye Baron currently treats some 70 active soldiers and their families in a private practice in Colorado Springs, near Fort Carson. From clinical discussions she's had with soldiers, Baron thinks PTSD could spike as high as 75 percent.

Such a rate, Robert Jay Lifton says, is inexorably tied to the war itself.

"This is a counterinsurgency being fought against an enemy which is hard to identify, and that leads to extraordinary stress," he says.

The issue with the most potential for psychological torment, according to Jonathan Shay, is whether soldiers feel they've been led into battle for a noble cause.

Shay, who compared the Vietnam veteran's battle experience to that of Achilles in his book, Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and The Undoing of Character, wrote how the Greek hero felt betrayed by his arrogant general, Agamemnon, whose disrespect of a priest of Apollo brought down a plague on the Greeks.

"If a soldier has experienced a betrayal of what's right by those in charge, their capacity for social trust can be impaired for the rest of their lives," Shay says.

Indeed, Dave Durman says he first began feeling uncomfortable in Iraq when it became clear there were no WMDs. He says his unit was furious when General Tommy Franks retired mid-war while the rest of National Guard and Reservists were subject to the Army's "stop-loss" policy, which extends soldiers' deployments.

Walter Padilla and Ron Luker were outraged when they saw Iraqi children playing in human sewage gurgling through the streets while the Army did nothing. "I thought we were here to help these people," Padilla says.

That sense of betrayal translates into what Shay calls "complex PTSD": nightmares, paranoia, violence, self-hate and a crippling distrust.

Shay, who also analogized the Vietnam veteran's homecoming to Odysseus's tortured return to Ithaca in a second book, Odysseus in America: Combat Trauma and the Trials of Homecoming, says that after Vietnam, "Vets were coming home and burning through their social capital. Everything in their life was being destroyed or used up."

Peterson's dream-induced violence, Padilla's bar fights, Durman's drinking, Luker's accusations about his wife are powerful examples of a similar dynamic.

According to the VA, veterans with PTSD are more apt to be jobless, impoverished, homeless, addicted, imprisoned, without a stable family and three times more likely to die before the rest of us.

Many of the soldiers Kaye Baron treats tell her they only want to get far away from their lives at home.

"They just want to go off in the mountains," she says. "And be by themselves."

Since reporting on this story began in October, Joshua Peterson and Dave Durman have started therapy at the VA. They're likely getting some of the most advanced care in the world. They're also lucky. Peterson's mother-in-law knows a VA psychiatrist, and Durman was already enrolled, thanks to his time in the Navy.

Meanwhile, Walter Padilla is trying to leave the military and says he'll get help once out. Ron Luker is still in Iraq and Crystal Luker says she'll drag her husband to the VA if she has to.

These soldiers won't be alone. So far, more than 10,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan have sought psychological help from the VA, and there's every indication the numbers will jump significantly.

Despite the challenges these numbers predict, Dr. Harold Kudler, co-chair of the VA's PTSD Committee, says: "We've never been so prepared." Kudler, who practices at the Durham VA hospital, points to unprecedented cooperation with the Department of Defense, intensified PTSD outreach and the 206 vet centers.

But some say that preparation is not enough. "You can only provide the services for which you have the resources," says VA psychiatrist Scott Murray. "There has to be significant improvement in an allocation of funds to make that occur."

On Nov. 20, Congress added $1 billion to the Bush administration's $27.1 billion VA health care budget for 2005. The amount fell $1.5 billion short of what was recommended by the House Veterans Affairs Committee. And while Congress earmarked an additional $15 million for PTSD, few think that money will make much difference.

"The heads of the VA health care networks are all trying to figure out how the hell they're going to manage," says Rick Weidman, director of government relations for Vietnam Veterans of America.

As for the VA's mental health plan, which estimated an extra $1.65 billion was needed to fix things fully, VA spokesperson Laurie Tranter says: "We cannot comment on this now. The plan is still being finalized."

Still, all the money and services in the world will not necessarily solve the pain of PTSD.

In 1968, a young soldier named Lewis Puller came back from Vietnam without his legs and hands. They'd been blown off by a Viet Cong land mine. Puller, the son of the most decorated Marine in American history, soon became a veterans' rights advocate and later a Pentagon lawyer. He married a politician, had two children and, in 1991, wrote a Pulitzer Prize-winning book: Fortunate Son: The Healing of a Vietnam Vet. Popular on Capitol Hill and among veterans, Puller had seemingly risen from the physical wounds and the depression and alcoholism that haunted him for years to live a remarkable life.

On May 11, 1994, 26 years after returning home, Puller shot and killed himself. In the end, the soldier's heart hurt too much.

Amid an outpouring of grief, one Vietnam vet wrote an e-mail to Jonathan Shay that he published in Odysseus in America.

"I get real tired of hidin' and runnin' from the demons," the vet wrote. "Am I the only one? Has it crossed anyone else's mind? You think maybe Lew was right? Is it the only real escape? I got questions. I'm out of answers."

Thirty years from now, one wonders how many veterans from this war will echo those words.

Dan Frosch is a former staff writer for The Santa Fe Reporter and currently a New York-based freelance writer for The Nation, In These Times and other publications. This story was funded by the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies.

Barbara Solow with the Independent Weekly contributed reporting to this story.

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1038
(12/19/04 12:55 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Does anyone else find it particularly frightening that even a conservitive,right-wing christian is scared by what's happening in this country?

I Am A Conservative Christian,
And The Religious Right Scares Me, Too By Chuck Baldwin The Covenant News ~ December 15, 2004

For those readers who are unfamiliar with my biography, let me here provide a thumbnail sketch of my conservative bona fides:

I attended, graduated, or received degrees from fundamentalist Christian schools such as Midwestern Baptist College in Pontiac, Michigan, Thomas Road Bible Institute (now known as Liberty Bible Institute at Liberty University) in Lynchburg, Virginia, Christian Bible College in Rocky Mount, North Carolina, and Trinity Baptist College in Jacksonville, Florida.

I am currently in my thirtieth year as the Senior Pastor of the Crossroad Baptist Church (Independent) in Pensacola, Florida. I was the Executive Director of the Florida Moral Majority in the early 1980's. I was an active member of the local Christian Coalition.

I have marched and protested against abortion clinics. I have led several pro-life rallies and even led our church to construct A Memorial To Aborted Babies. I have conducted small and large (some drawing crowds numbering in the thousands) pro-life, pro-family rallies and meetings in the Pensacola area and in many towns and cities across the state of Florida.

When Ronald Reagan was running for President, I helped Dr. Jerry Falwell register more than fifty thousand new conservative voters in my state. I have attended White House functions with former President Reagan and former Vice President George H.W. Bush.

I supported and defended Chief Justice Roy Moore and his fight to display a Ten Commandments monument at a pro-Ten Commandments rally in Montgomery, Alabama and even on national television.

I am an annual member of the National Rifle Association and a life member of Gun Owners of America. I have been the featured speaker at several pro-Second Amendment rallies.

No one can honestly question my commitment to pro-life, pro-family, conservative causes. That being said, the Religious Right, as it now exists, scares me.

For one reason, on the whole, the Religious Right has obviously and patently become little more than a propaganda machine for the Republican Party in general and for President G.W. Bush in particular. This is in spite of the fact that both Bush and the Republican Party in Washington, D.C., have routinely ignored and even trampled the very principles which the Religious Right claims to represent.

Therefore, no longer does the Religious Right represent conservative, Christian values. Instead, they represent their own self-serving interests at the expense of those values.

It also appears painfully obvious to me that in order to sit at the king's table, the Religious Right is willing to compromise any principle, no matter how sacred. As such, it has become a hollow movement. Sadly, the Religious Right is now a movement without a cause, except the cause of advancing the Republican Party.

Beyond that, the Religious Right is actively assisting those who would destroy our freedoms. On the whole, the Religious Right comports with those within the Bush administration and within the Republican Party who, in the name of "fighting terrorism," are actually terrorizing constitutional protections of our liberties.

The Religious Right offered virtually no resistance to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the passage of the Patriot Act, or the recently created position of National Intelligence Director. Neither did the Religious Right offer even a whimper of protest as President Bush and Republicans in Congress created a first-ever national ID card in the new intelligence bill, which eerily has more in common with early Twentieth Century German and Russian intelligence institutions than anything envisioned by America's Founding Fathers.

Another disconcerting feature of today's Religious Right is its attempt to Christianize political entities which it supports and to demonize political entities which it opposes. This trend is especially scary.

When people are told that they are voting "Christian" by voting for Republican Party candidates, it is being intimated that they are voting non-Christian by voting for any other candidate. This is not only silly on its face, it is downright dangerous!

I don't remember anyone saying people voted "Christian" when they elected the outspoken Christian candidate, Jimmy Carter, President. Yet, Carter, in his personal life, demonstrated as much, if not more, Christianity than does George W. Bush. If you recall, Carter even taught Sunday School in a Southern Baptist Church while President.

However, in spite of the fact that President Bush and the Republican Party in Washington, D.C., have repeatedly supported copious unchristian (not to mention unconstitutional) programs and policies, Christians act as if Bush and his fellow Republicans have ushered in the Millennial Kingdom.

More than that, the Religious Right appears to believe that G.W. Bush is the anointed vicar of Christ. But instead of wearing the garb of a religious leader, he wears the shroud of a politico and a military commander-in-chief.

As such, in the minds of the Religious Right, Bush's war in Iraq is a holy crusade. America is fast taking on the shape of the old Holy Roman Empire and President Bush is quickly morphing into a modern day Caesar.

The willingness of the Religious Right to give President Bush king-like subservience is easily seen in the way they demonize anyone who dares to oppose him. This is very unnerving.

Are we heading for a modern day religious inquisition, this one led not by the Catholic Church but by the Religious Right? Are we witnessing the type of marriage between Church and State that America's founders originally feared?

I used to believe that liberals were paranoid for being fearful of conservative Christians gaining political power. Now, I share their trepidation.

Of course, the sad truth is, neither George W. Bush nor the Republican Party in Washington, D.C. represents genuine Christian or even conservative principles. If they did, they would take their oaths to the Constitution seriously and then neither liberals nor conservatives would have anything to fear, for the U.S. Constitution protects the rights and freedoms of all men.

Unfortunately, when the seed of Bush's unconstitutional policies come to fruition, it will produce large scale fallout economically, socially, and politically. And sadder still will be that, instead of blaming Bush's infidelity to constitutional government and conservative principles, people will blame Christianity and conservatism itself. The result of this miscalculation will doubtless be a massive tide of support for more and greater unconstitutional government, but only under a different name.


Chuck Baldwin
chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1039
(12/19/04 1:25 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
This one hit me pretty hard.This is NOT the way it's supposed to be.

Food stamp use is on rise across U.S.
By Ron Harris
Of the Post-Dispatch
12/18/2004

Lisa Gray comforts her son Cody, 4, in their Ballwin apartment, Tuesday. Gray, a single working mother, relies on food stamps and a food pantry to help feed her family.


Growing up in Atlanta, Lisa Gray didn't know a thing about food stamps. From time to time, the family did visit a food pantry, but to make a contribution, certainly not to pick up food for themselves.

She, her mother, father and brother did just fine on her dad's salary as an aerospace engineer.

These days, however, Gray, a working mother of three, has joined a rapidly growing number of Americans who over the past four years have come to depend on both food stamps and food pantries.

Gray, 31, earns $6.25 an hour at a Ballwin discount store and receives sporadic child support payments from the children's father. After she pays the $545 in monthly rent for a cramped, exceptionally neat two-bedroom, one-bath apartment surrounded by upscale homes, another $200 or so in utilities and then day care for her 4-year-old son, Gray says there's simply no money left for food.

So to feed her family, Gray counts on her monthly allotment of food stamps and the brown paper bags stuffed with groceries from the Circle of Concern food pantry in Valley Park.

Since 2000, Gray and more than 6 million other Americans have joined the ranks of the families who find it increasingly difficult to perform a most basic function - to put food on their tables.

The economic indicators are numerous.

After a seven-year decline, the number of Americans on food stamps has shot up 39 percent since 2000, according to federal statistics. Every state, except Hawaii, has felt the impact. In Arizona, food stamp rolls have increased 104 percent, in Nevada, 97 percent; Oregon, 79 percent; South Carolina, 68 percent; Missouri, 65 percent.

Texas has added nearly a million people to its food stamp rolls in only four years.

Part of that increase was fueled by states' increased efforts to enroll a greater portion of people eligible for food stamps and the placement of people back onto the rolls who were knocked off during welfare reform. Most of it, however, social workers say, is the growing number of Americans unable to feed themselves without help.

"Clearly, most of this is because of increased need," said Carol Adams, head of the Illinois Department of Social Services. Illinois has seen a 31 percent increase in the number of people on food stamps since 2000.

Food banks see increased demand

Meanwhile, the nation's network of food banks and food pantries say they are under intense pressure to meet the demand of hungry families, nearly half of them working.

"We don't have enough hours in the day to serve everybody who comes in," said John Holmer, executive director of Metro Caring, a Denver food pantry that last year served 34,000 people, half of whom were children.

At the Circle of Concern in Valley Park, executive director Glen Koenen said that last month, the pantry served more than 1,200 families, far beyond the pantry's capacity of 750 it established two years ago.

America's Second Harvest, the nation's largest private network of food providers, served 23 million Americans in 2001, 6 million more than the federal food stamp program, according to an independent study.

With demand increasing at food pantries around the country as much as 10 percent, 20 percent, even 40 percent annually, the network is still probably serving more than the federal government, said Doug O'Brien, vice president for public policy and research for the organization.

The families come to the pantries for the same reasons as Gray. By the time they pay the bills - housing, utilities, gas, clothes, prescription drugs - there is little or no money left for food.

"It's hard, but when you have kids, you swallow your pride," said Gray, as she waited to see a counselor at Circle of Concern.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced in November than 36.3 million Americans, more than one of every 10, is at risk of hunger. That figure was the highest number the agency has recorded since it began keeping a tally in 1995.

The changing face of hunger in the U.S.

What is driving those numbers is a convergence of three economic realities, realities that have changed the nature of hunger in America, say economists, social workers and those who help the needy.

"In the 1980s, soup kitchens were urban and largely served a recipient base that was male, homeless, chronically unemployed with alcohol or other substance abuse often as a contributing factor," O'Brien said. "By 2001, one out of four persons was a child, 40 percent of them were working adults. What you're seeing is this dramatic shift in the face of hunger in America."

Economists and others explain that many Americans, such as Sheryl Schmidt of Manchester, are still reeling from the recession that began in 2000 and was further exacerbated by the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11 the following year.

"I can quickly think of three people who were making $130,000 a year in health care, and post 9/11, those jobs were gone," said Catherine D'amato, president and chief executive of the Greater Boston Food Bank.

Since 2001, the nation has lost 2 million jobs. Even with the recent economic recovery, the country remains 585,000 jobs short of where it was in 2001, economists say.

Schmidt, 49, was laid off two years ago from her job as a business office director. Schmidt decided to go back to school to retool for a changing economy.

"I've always had a job, and I've always made halfway decent money for having just a high school diploma," Schmidt said. "I went back to school thinking that I was going to do better."

But even after receiving an associate's degree from St. Louis Community College at Meramec, Schmidt still has not been able to find work. She and her 10-year-old daughter were forced to move in with her mother. And eventually Schmidt, like Gray, found herself in the food stamp program and a client of Circle of Concern.

The human impact of the recession

Across the country, there are signs that millions of Americans are still feeling the result of the recession, which peaked last year.

At the Smith Chapel food bank in Logan, Ohio, for example, cars recently started lining up at 7:30 a.m. for the 9 a.m. opening of the facility. By the time the doors opened, residents in late-model vans, SUVs, pickups and cars stretched two miles long outside the facility.

"Many, many metropolitan areas have not recovered those jobs that they lost from 2000 to 2003," said Russ Signorino, a labor analyst and vice president of United Way of Greater St. Louis. "Even though their unemployment rate is coming down, they have fewer jobs in their area than they did four years ago."

Additionally, economists said, the unemployment rate doesn't really reflect true economic well-being. Many Americans work two jobs in order to make ends meet. If they lost one job, that may place them in the ranks of the working poor, but they don't show up as unemployed.

Finally, in many cases, those people who have returned to work "are worse off now than they were when we were in official economic slowdown because they've been unemployed for so long," Signorino said. "It's one thing to lose your job and maybe have three months of pay in the bank. But when you're unemployed for a year or two and you no longer have the money in the bank, once you get a new job your income may not have declined, but your assets have."

The second trend driving up hunger in America, economists say, is structural changes in the nation's economy. As the nation moves from an economy based on manufacturing to one based on service and retail, America is going through a structural change akin to the industrial revolution of the early 1990s. Consequently, millions of workers have been left on the sidelines or in jobs that pay much lower than their previous positions.

"In the early 1900s, the country went from agriculture to manufacturing," said Alison Fraser, director of economic policy studies for the Heritage Foundation, a think tank in Washington. "So you saw a lot of displaced jobs as the skill sets required changed. We've got that same thing going on now.

"Those people who would have gone into manufacturing or were in those manufacturing jobs, those people's worlds have changed quite dramatically. The pain in this transition is how do those people retool themselves and reposition themselves."

Dennis Hoffman, labor market economist for the Illinois Department of Employment Security, said residents of the five Illinois counties in the St. Louis metropolitan area have been wrestling with the shift.

There has been a rapid expansion in jobs in services, retail trades, construction and warehousing, with Hershey Foods Corp. the most recent addition in Madison County.

"But part of the dilemma is that while the distribution jobs are good-paying jobs, they're not as good as the older manufacturing jobs," Hoffman said.

The third trend, economists say, is that with housing, medical and home fuel costs rising much faster than the nation's salaries, many families, particularly low-income and the working poor, find themselves pushed onto an even lower economic rung. Consequently, what were once considered emergency services, such as food pantries and food stamps, have become vital everyday needs.

"We used to call them emergency food pantries," Koenen in St. Louis said. "More and more often, it's what families have to do every month or five or six months a year."

Food pantries see more working families

Across the country, food banks and food pantries report that while they continue to serve significant populations of elderly and disabled on fixed incomes, their greatest growth has been among working families.

"Folks simply don't have enough to get by and they are living in poverty while working," said Stacy Dean, director of food stamp policy for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington. "It's a story that a lot of Americans don't understand, that Americans may be working two jobs, doing everything you expect them to do, and still living in poverty."

Consequently, as families go about the hard choices of how to spread their meager resources, they place food at the bottom of the list.

"Food is something we have a surplus of in this country," said Bill Bolling, executive director of the Atlanta Food Bank, which last year distributed more than 15 million pounds of food to 750 food pantries, child-care centers, nursing homes and other agencies in 38 counties. "We don't have a surplus of housing, health care, jobs or automobiles for people to get to jobs.

"So, what often happens for families who are short of money is that they pay their rent, the power bill, put gas in the car, put shoes on the kids and go to the local pantry to get food."

In Boston, D'amato said the harsh new economic realities "have institutionalized hunger in this country," by making it a common occurrence for people who go to work everyday.

Back in the St. Louis area, Gray isn't sure when she, her 6-year-old twins and her youngest son will see the day they don't need food stamps or the food pantry.

She said she probably will accept an offer from her mother and father to pay for her to go back to college.

"But right now, I just don't know," she said. "I just don't know."

Steve Bolhafner of News Research contributed to this story.

MsAbsynthe
New Student/Teachers Apprentice
Posts: 15
(12/21/04 1:31 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Shadeaux, thank you for all this information. Just to let you know, before I had even read this, my whole family, which has been Republican for 40 years, was disappointed in the 2000 election.

See, regardless of our personal disagreements, we have ALWAYS strongly felt you needed the President and the House of different Parties, so that whatever would be passed, would truly reflect the hearts of ALL people of America.

Then, we had hopes in the 2004 elections; not ONE Republican in my family voted for George Bush. We were shocked, because Kerry was so much more well spoken during the debates.

The system failed US! After 40 years, all of us, well over 200 people, are re-registering as Democrats.

We tried to fight the system from the inside, and that failed; I remember when Republicans didn't even worry about the Right to Choose...that wasn't even a problem, until Bush Sr. went to run for 2nd term, and went after the Religious Right's vote...Republican Party has not represented me since that moment, and I kept trying to fight from the inside.

I have been severely disappointed in what I have seen happening.

And then to find my whole family, whom I have personal differences, agree with me, was a mind blower! We are ALL re-registering! Personal problems have been put aside, so we have a future on this planet.

Suddenly I feel like I'm 9 years old, my family is with me, and Santa Clause is real.

- Julie

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1042
(12/22/04 2:08 am)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
I know how you feel,Julie.It seems like more and more people now understand that "Democrat" and "Republican" are more than just words,and it DOES matter which candidate gets into office.And you're right,when there's a prez of one party,it helps if the majority of the members of the House,and Senate are of the opposite party.It keeps things honest,so to speak.

I'm glad to hear that in your family,the same politics that caused problems,is now becoming a common goal.It really bites to differ in politics to the point where relationships are affected.My own brother is a die-hard Republican.Rush Limbaugh is his hero.And we haven't spoken in almost 15 years.I've tried to call him a few times,but he's always "too busy" to talk.And I've always made it a point to NEVER talk politics with him,knowing it would be a problem.I would love nothing more than to hear from him that he would rather have his little sister in his life,than worry about what I believe in,politically.

And yes,I firmly think the system has failed us.The dishonesty,cronyism,and at times outright criminal behaviours that have happened here truly make me wonder if anyone actually still believes we live in the same America our parents grew up in.

And I'm glad to see that not everyone thinks I'm a crack-pot,for posting so much of this stuff.LOL

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1043
(12/24/04 1:00 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
Ex-Hostage: Rebels Wanted Bush Re-Elected


PARIS (AP) - French journalists held hostage for four months in Iraq said their militant captors told them they wanted President Bush to win re-election.

In a four-page account of their ordeal, one of the reporters, Georges Malbrunot, also wrote that they saw several other hostages who were later decapitated. The journalists said their captors viewed foreign businessmen working in Iraq as their enemies.

One of the captors from the group calling itself the Islamic Army in Iraq said Bush's re-election would boost their cause, Malbrunot wrote in Friday's edition of Le Figaro, the French daily he works for.

``We want Bush because with him the American troops will stay in Iraq and that way we will be able to develop,'' Malbrunot cited the captor as saying.

Bush beat Democrat John Kerry to win the presidency last month.

Another captor, who described himself as the group's head of internal intelligence, told the men that the Islamic Army has four enemies: American and coalition troops, ``their collaborators, that is to say Italian businessmen, or even French,'' as well Iraqi police and spies.

Malbrunot wrote that the Islamic Army has 15,000 to 17,000 members and that its hostage-takings are carefully organized.

``There are those who stop people on the roads, those that carry out interrogations, those that keep guard and those that judge,'' he wrote.

He and fellow French reporter Christian Chesnot feared at times that they would be killed, he said.

Others hostages they saw who were later decapitated included two Macedonians, an Iraqi power station executive and a bodyguard for Ahmad Chalabi, a candidate in next month's Iraqi elections and a one-time Pentagon favorite, he recounted.

Malbrunot, 41, and Chesnot, 38, were released Tuesday.

In a separate interview on RTL radio, Malbrunot said it would take time to recover from their ordeal. ``Sleeping, for example, is hard,'' he said.

``But the life of a free man is far easier than that of a hostage,'' he added.

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1053
(1/9/05 1:22 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again


Earth Still Stirs Weeks After Tsunami Quake




MELBOURNE (Jan. 9) - Two weeks on, the Earth is still vibrating from the massive undersea earthquake off Indonesia that triggered the tsunami, Australian researchers said on Sunday.

The Australian National University (ANU) said the reverberations were similar in form to the ringing of a bell, though without the sound, and were picked up by gravity monitoring instruments.

"These are not things that are going to throw you off your chair, but they are things that the kinds of instruments that are in place around the world can now routinely measure," said ANU Earth Sciences researcher Herb McQueen.

"It is certainly above the background level of vibrations that the Earth is normally accustomed to experiencing."

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake, the strongest for 40 years, struck off the coast of Indonesia's Sumatra island on Dec. 26. The tsunami it generated claimed more than 150,000 lives.

McQueen said the oscillation was fading and at current levels equated to about a millimeter of vertical motion of the Earth.

Immediately after the quake the oscillation was probably in the 20 to 30 cm motion range that is typically generated in the Earth by the movements of the sun and moon.

"This particular earthquake because it was 10 times larger than most of the recent large earthquakes is continuing to reverberate," McQueen said.

"We can still see a steady signal of the Earth vibrating as a result of that earthquake two weeks later. From what it looks like, it appears it will probably continue to oscillate for several more weeks."

The ANU's gravity meter is housed in a fireproof basement at the Mount Stromlo Observatory near the capital Canberra and is part of a global geodynamics project established after major earthquakes in the 1960s.

U.S. scientists said just after the quake that it may have permanently accelerated the Earth's rotation -- shortening days by a fraction of a second -- and caused the planet to wobble on its axis.

Richard Gross, a geophysicist with NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, theorized that a shift of mass towards the Earth's center during the quake caused the planet to spin three millionths of a second faster and tilt about 2.5 centimeters on its axis.

The geologic circumstances that set up one of the worst natural disasters in a century were much longer in the making. How long?

Try 300 million years. Maybe twice that long.

Once, scientists believe, all the Earth's continents were combined in a single gigantic land mass they call Pangea. But geological forces caused it to break apart; and ever since then, the pieces, which scientists call plates, have been drifting across the planet at an average rate of a few inches a century.

As the plates move, grinding collisions between them trigger earthquakes and even build mountains. The Indian subcontinent, for example, has been moving inexorably northward for millions of years, colliding with Asia like a slow-motion car wreck, the land at the edge of the collision buckling to form the Himalayas. Mount Everest and other mountains in the chain are still growing at a rate of about a half-inch per year.

Geologists say it was a lurching collision between the Indian plate and the Burma plate, which grind together along a 750-mile long, north-south fault in the Indian Ocean, that triggered the recent earthquake off Sumatra, and the resulting tsunami.

The quake is believed to have shifted north Sumatra and smaller nearby islands by as much as 60 feet.

In human time, earthquakes that powerful are rare, but in the vastness of geologic time, they are commonplace.

"An earthquake of this magnitude, in this part of the world, has probably occurred about a million times since the breakup of Pangea,'' said Chris Scotese, a geophysicist at the University of Texas-Arlington. "No exaggeration.''

Geologists believe they understand, at least generally, what causes the plates to move and collide.

The Earth, they explain, is made up of pressurized layers. At the center is a hot metal core about 2,160 miles thick, the center of it solid and the outer layer molten. Then comes the hot, rocky mantle, about 1,800 miles thick. On top of that is the part we live on, a thin, cooler crust, perhaps 30 miles thick.

The crust is not solid and unbroken like the coating on a gumball. Rather, it is fractured into more than a dozen overlapping, rigid plates of rocky armor. The plates move relative to one another as they slide atop the hotter layers below.

The overlapping points between plates are called subduction zones, and that is where the biggest earthquakes strike, changing Earth's map slightly each time. Volcanoes most often erupt in these boundaries between the plates.

Understanding these forces more precisely - in enough detail to predict earthquakes, for example - has proven elusive, however. For one thing, many of the boundaries between plates are covered by deep oceans, making them inaccessible to study. Even when plates come together on land, as they do in California, the real action occurs out of sight miles below the surface.

Only now, in central California, have scientists started to drill about two miles into a fault zone to learn more about these forces. But even that will offer only a blurry snapshot; the Dec. 26 earthquake occurred on a larger fault nearly six miles down.

Really big earthquakes - those like the Sumatra quake that noticeably rearrange the landscape - are so rare that there are few opportunities to study them. Until the Sumatra quake, it had been 40 years since a magnitude 9 temblor occurred - in Alaska. Like fishermen waiting for the big one, geologists can spend their entire careers waiting for the chance to study the huge temblor that never comes.

"A lot of what we see that is catastrophic occurs in the snap of a finger,'' says David Wald, a geophysicist for the U.S. Geological Survey. "And then nothing happens for hundreds of years.''


01-09-05

shadeaux63
Keeper of dreams
Posts: 1054
(1/10/05 2:29 pm)
Reply

Re: This Just in...again
People's Choice Awards go to Fahrenheit 9/11, Shrek 2 and TV shows CSI, Joey

Canadian Press

Sunday, January 09, 2005

PASADENA, Calif. (CP) - The season of award shows kicked off Sunday night with Michael Moore's controversial film Fahrenheit 9/11 winning the People's Choice Award for favourite movie. "We live in a great country and we all love our country very much and I am so amazed that you did this - the people of America; that you voted for this film," said a laughing Moore as the audience cheered wildly. "I'm honoured and gratified." He dedicated the award to those who are fighting in Iraq.

The film Shrek 2 and television shows CSI:Crime Scene Investigation and Joey won multiple honours at the awards.

Mike Myers accepted the prize as Shrek 2 was voted favourite movie comedy and favourite animated movie. "I'm very, very honoured to be part of something where people care so much that it be good," he said.

The categories are a little out of the ordinary at these awards, with Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore, for instance, taking the prize for favourite on-screen chemistry for their 50 First Dates film.

"Chemistry can be a good and bad thing," Sandler joked as he and Barrymore picked up their trophy. "Chemistry is good when you make love with it. Chemistry is bad when you make crack with it."

Marg Helgenberger of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation was voted favourite female TV star and the show was the favourite TV drama, beating The O.C., Gilmore Girls, the Sopranos and Alias.

Matt LeBlanc of Joey was favourite male TV star, and his series received the award for favourite new TV comedy.

"We're really really honoured to be on the schedule," LeBlanc said as he thanked viewers and those who work on the program.

The hit TV show Desperate Housewives was voted favourite new television drama and Will and Grace won favourite TV comedy.

Prince, in a hooded white suit, presented the favourite leading lady award to Renee Zellweger.

"I feel so lucky and so grateful to be able to be part of films that resonate with you in some way," said Zellweger, the star of Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason.

Ellen DeGeneres won the prize for daytime talk show host.

Will Smith was favourite male action movie star.

Singer Sheryl Crow won the award for best remake for her rendition of The First Cut is the Deepest.

Jason Alexander shared hosting duties with Malcolm-Jamal Warner, who stars with him in the new sitcom Listen Up.

Presenters for the evening included Jessica Simpson, Nick Lachey and William Shatner. The awards' 31st ceremony included new categories, among them favourite movie drama, smile and cartoon star.

There was even a category for favourite makeover reality show, where the prize went to Extreme Makeover: Home Edition.

The nomination and awards process, formerly based on a national poll, was revised to be compiled by Entertainment Weekly, the People's Choice production team and pop culture fans. The public chose the winners online.
© The Canadian Press 2005



WOW! F9/11,Will and Grace,Ellen Degeneres-I guess all the voters were democrats.

Edited by: shadeaux63 at: 1/11/05 11:38 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- Children Of the Earth and Sky - Announcements - Home -
moon phases
Get your free daily horoscope + free daily forecast below.
Choose your zodiac sign:
Aries
March 21 - April 20
Libra
September 24 - October 23
Taurus
April 21 - May 21
Scorpio
October 24 - November 22
Gemini
May 22 - June 21
Sagittarius
November 23 - December 21
Cancer
June 22 - July 23
Capricorn
December 22 - January 20
Leo
July 24 - August 23
Aquarius
January 21 - February 19
Virgo
August 24 - September 23
Pisces
February 20 - March 20


Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2007 ezboard, Inc.