|
Author
|
Comment
|
curiousGeorge2
Unregistered User
(5/7/03 12:43 pm)
Reply
|
OH GOOD, A GROUP CONSENSUS ! ! !
Modesto and Berkeley police went to a marina on San Francisco Bay to investigate Peterson's claim that he was fishing at the time his wife disappeared. No details were available about what detectives might have found out.
"At this point, he is not a suspect," Detective Doug Ridenour said. Police said they had no evidence of foul play in the disappearance.
Despite the fact that the police verified Scott Peterson's honesty because he was spotted at the Marina, they did not disclose the obvious and instead, they provided the opportunity for the media to demonoize Scott Peterson by repeatedly claiming that Scott Peterson was lying when he said that he went fishing.
This bias is too extreme and too hostile to justify, and the hypocricy it has uncovered has absolutely destroyed police credibility. The current suggestion that Scott Peterson is guilty of murdering his wife because he is telling the truth about what he did no December 24 is too bizarre to take seriously. Scott Peterson was spotted on his boat, struggling to familiarize himself with the gadgets of his new toy. He was not hauling his dead wife's body over his shoulder, and try as they may, to discredit Ms. Mitchell, who spotted Laci walking her dog a full 45 minutes after Scott left to go fishing, the fact that the police did not even bother to contact Ms. Mitchell speaks volumes about the validity of the police campaign to demonize Scott Peterson.
To be fair, if the police wish to use Scott Peterson's alibi against him, they should have accepted it in the first place. Police Hypocricy reflects Police State Tactics and they will NEVER prevail.
|
Free27
Unregistered User
(5/7/03 12:57 pm)
Reply
|
Re: OH GOOD, A GROUP CONSENSUS ! ! !
There are also rumors SP paid the Mitchells and I would not put it past him.....
|
Lynne
Unregistered User
(5/26/03 7:39 am)
Reply
|
Chandra Levy, Laci and Michael Skakel were destroyed...
Sounds like Chandra and Laci were killed by the same people -and I think the people who framed Michael Skakel are the key do exposing these people who abuse the legal system to grant murderers like Ken Littleton immunity from prosecution.
Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising the skinny little kid who was blamed for Martha's murder, and the process of victimizing Scott Peterson is identical to the one that was used to demonize Scott Peterson and to make it look like Ken Littleton/Amber Frey are victims:
www.chandra.alturl.com
|
Sarah88
Unregistered User
(11/6/03 9:08 pm)
Reply
|
 F*** OFF!!
 SCOTT IS INNOCENT!!
Oh, and just to piss you and everyone like you off -
SCOTT'S JUST GORGEOUS AND I LOVE HIM SOOOOOOO MUCH! 
Hah!
I don't see a case here worth anything - he didn't do it!
|
FREE SP
Unregistered User
(8/27/04 7:42 am)
Reply
|
FREE SCOTT
I CANT UNDERSTAND WHY EVERYONE IS BEING SO HARD AND CRUEL TO SCOTT. EVERYBODY ACTS LIKE THIS WOMAN LACEY WAS A SAINT OR SOMETHING. I CANT BLAME HIM FOR CHEATING ON HER. WHEN THEY GOT MARRIED SHE LOOKED GOOD, AND THEN SHE LATER GETS FAT AND LETS HERSELF GO. SHE CONSTANTLY BITCHED AT HIM, AND EVEN HER OWN FRIENDS SAY SHE ALWAYS NEEDED TO BE THE CENTER OF ATTENTION. THAT POOR GUY HAD TO PUT UP WITH A LOT. HE MARRIED SOMEONE WHO HE THOUGHT COULD NOT GET PREGNANT BECAUSE HE DIDNT WANT KIDS. ITS NOT FAIR SHE GETS HERSELF PREGNANT WHEN SHE KNOWS HE DIDN'T WANT ANY KIDS. WHY SHOULD HE BE FORCED TO BE A FATHER. NOW SHE'S DEAD AND STILL MESSING UP HIS LIFE. HE DESERVES TO BE SET FREE. SCOTT IS NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING................
|
