Sarah88
Unregistered User
(10/25/03 11:40 am) Reply
THE GUILT OF SCOTT
I am 15 years old, and I don't believe it.
It is scary to think there are adults out there buying this crap. I will go pray for Scott now.
Sad. *Shaking head*
lnynnefoster
Unregistered User
(11/2/03 6:25 pm) Reply
Why are message boards censored?
This is quite entertaining. I am an Attorney who posted messages on Court TV message boards, to illustrate the preposterous nature of the case against Scott Peterson. I thought I'd take a break from trial preparation today, to post another, much needed message on some of the exceedingly misleading threads that Court TV promotes. One such thread relies extensively on the National Enquirer, and repeatedly makes statements like "the National Enquirer got that right too."
I discussed the preposterous nature of the National Enquirer's "evidence" by referring to this brilliant analysis about the value of the National Enquirer's "reporting".
My comments have been erased and replaced by linking directly to the garbage that the National Enquirer publishes. I tried to point out this ludicrous practice to Court TV message board posters, but I have evidently been banned. Quite strange, but not surprising, given the fact that it is not possible to accuse Scott of murder unless one is gullible enough to believe in the National Enquirer, and the person who controls Court TV message boards, does not tolerate anybody who ridicules the garbage that the National Enquirer promotes.
SCOTT'S INNOCENT!!
I pray for him nightly. I cry for him, and I smile for him. I hope he makes it through this, the poor thing - he and his family. The Rocha's have plenty of support; they're a lot better off with all that, but the Peterson family is only getting intolerance and more grief from the media and public. They act like they're immune to things like this - like, they're not sad, heartbroken, and utterly devastated that Laci and Connor are lost as the Rocha family is, and I find it disturbing and outrageous. I feel sorry for both families, who have both suffered, as well as for Laci, and Scott, and his little baby Connor, especially. I always wanted a baby that was a boy - I'm sure Scott was happy and proud to find out that that was what he was getting... so he could go golfing with him or do daddy-son things together... maybe he would've been a daddy's boy? It's all so horrific to think about - I cry for Connor and his daddy all the time. I feel like I am walking through this with them.
Remember, though, people - being a Scott Supporter may be hard, and emotionally draining, and people react almost violently to this position, but somebody's got to do it! And DON'T BACK DOWN!! NO MATTER WHAT!! MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD!! SUPPORT SCOTT IF YOU TRULY FEEL HE IS INNOCENT!!
I know!
Scott is innocent and it's obvious to EVERYONE with a brain and a fair nature who gave him a chance from the beginning... I never believed it. Never. I won't, either!! The D.A. is cruel and cold-hearted for forcing Lee Peterson on the stand, in an effort to make him help take his own child's life away by testifying AGAINST him during the preliminary hearing and trial!! How awful is that?! Jim Brazelton deserves, at the very least, a huge slap in the face for the pain he is causing Mr. Peterson, who has already lost a grandbaby and daughter-in-law. That is some bulls**t right there... I'm glad to see Mr. Peterson kept his cool, though; he is an amazing father and a good man. But what Jim Brazelton made him do - get up there on the stand to testify against his own son in a death penalty trial - is just beyond cruel and sickening. They are like this - . Pure evil.
David Sween exposes crackpots who are trying to frame Scott.
David Sween exposes crackpots who are trying to frame Scott.
Law enforcement has never demonstrated the need to investigate Scott Peterson. When LE found a loaded semi-automatic in Scott's truck, they didn't even test his hands for gun powder residue. Actually, that isn't exactly true. The Cross-Examination of Detective Brocchini is more specific:
Q. Now, and it was because of your having found the pistol that you were interested in doing the GSR test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And GSR is gunshot residue test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And Mr. Peterson presented his hand or hands for you to make those kind of swabs, whatever you do to do a GSR test, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And so you did that test?
A. I did.
Q. And so you collected some kind of swabs?
A. Yes.
Q. And what did you do with those after that?
A. I booked them into evidence.
Q. Was anything ever done with them?
A. No.
Q. So they were never tested?
A. Not to my knowledge, unless they're done and I didn't know about it.
This is very strange testimony. A cynic would have to say the tests were done, they were negative, and so they 'lost' them.
Somebody who is more analytical would say that if Scott had shot Laci, the police would have called it a 'hard kill'. A realist would have to conclude that the tests were done, they were negative, and the police turned their attention to 'soft kill' speculation.
It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that Scott Peterson murdered his wife, given the fact that Detective Brocchini was not even concerned enough to prove or to disprove the claim that Scott Peterson shot Laci. Detective Brocchini is either incompetent, corrupt or he does not care to investigate the murder of Laci Peterson.
They should break criminals, not innocent victims.
"Law enforcement has an ability and aptitude to consistently leak information," said Dan Klores, a public relations executive who has given advice to celebrities involved in legal matters. "They have all sorts of different antennas to distribute information, and it is often part of a strategy to break the defendant before the trial even begins."
_________
They failed to break Scott and they failed to break the man that Tom Sneddon calls, "Wacko Jacko".
Re: AGREED, BARB! IT'S OBVIOUS!
Do they solve any crimes?
On November 22, 2003, the Modesto Bee reported that it is unclear when Frey learned that the man she had been dating, Scott Peterson, was married and his pregnant wife missing since Christmas Eve.
What the hell is going on here? A man's wife is murdered and the useless media does not even know what the hell Amber knew and when she knew it. THIS STINKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mark Geragos is not going to take this BULLSHIT sitting down !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is Nancy Grace mentally challenged?
Stinks is an understatement. Get this, I just discovered this terrific link !
The case against Scott Peterson was delivered by God, to prove that any moron who accuses this man of murder, is the scum of the earth.
To accuse Scott Peterson of murder, one would have to believe that this young man, who produced a receipt to prove he had launched a boat that nobody had ever heard of before, deliberately set himself up to create suspicion. Murderers make excuses, they do not produce preposterous alibis, and the suggestion that Scott Peterson used a boat that nobody had ever heard of to dump his wife in the Bay is ultimately preposterous because under the circumstances, the "secret" is not Laci's lifeless body --the "secret" is the boat that nobody had ever heard of, and Scott Peterson never tried to hide this secret. Indeed, the smile on his face was broader than the horizon, not because he thought he was getting away with murder, but because he was playing with his new toy, and Scott Peterson's nightmare began, not when he was exposed trying to hide his secret boat, but when he frantically scoured the neighborhood, in search of his missing wife. In the final analysis, if one examines all the evidence, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that Laci Peterson was kidnapped, but in fairness, nobody has ever claimed that Peterson critics, Court TV blowhards Beth Karas and Nancy Grace, who repeatedly suggest that Scott Peterson is guilty, are anything more than ignorant, repugnant liars.
The fact that Nancy Grace and Beth Karas promote ignorant lies was conclusively exposed on January 14, 2004, when somebody placed a call on Larry King Live, to complain about Court TV message boards because they are heavily censored. The caller complained because messages that support Scott Peterson are routinely deleted, yet Beth Karas and Nancy Grace had the unmitigated gall to deny the indisputable fact that Court TV message boards are routinely censored. Clearly, we have investigated many of these recurring complaints about Court TV message boards ourselves, and if Beth Karas and Nancy Grace are too stupid to understand the merit of the complaint about Court TV message boards, they are inadvertent liars.
In a nutshell, anybody who slanders Scott Peterson is applauded on Court TV message boards, but anybody who defends Scott Peterson is banned. Despite this outrageous censorship, morons like Beth Karas and Nancy Grace claim that Court TV does not take a stand, where the guilt or innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned, and that is clearly an outright lie. The fact of the matter is, the claim that Scott Peterson murdered Laci cannot survive scrutiny, and that is why Court TV bans anybody who states the obvious. In the final analysis, it is not at all surprising because blowhards like Nancy Grace act like National Enquirer advocates, and this in not an isolated perversion of justice. Indeed, if Elizabeth Smart had been murdered, as Laci was, Nancy Grace would be applauding law enforcement for arresting Richard Albert Ricci whom she blamed for the abduction, and that would have provided the opportunity to murder Elizabeth Smart without the fear of ever being punished. Clearly, morons like Nancy Grace and Beth Karas aide and abet murderers when they accuse innocent people, and they should be prosecuted because they are ultimately responsible for the inexcusable failure to at least try to rescue Laci Peterson.
In the final analysis, critics like Beth Karas and Nancy Grace are stupid liars who should be prosecuted, for covering up the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson. These morons who pollute the airwaves with their moronic lies do not deserve a life, because Laci Peterson and Connor were pleading for theirs, when this poor, helpless, kidnapped woman was probably shot in the head, because the cowardly creeps who did this knew that they could get away with murder as long as they can rely upon morons like Nancy Grace and Beth Karas.
Some of the following messages that were posted on Court TV message boards were deleted because they do not support the preposterous claim that Scott Peterson murdered Laci.
Scott Peterson was sleeping with his wife, when he allegedly murdered Laci, in the middle of the night. Richard Albert Ricci was sleeping with his wife, when he allegedly kidnapped Elizabeth, in the middle of the night, and visions of delusions, danced in the heads of Nancy Grace and Beth Karas.
713 Date: 2004-02-29 18:08:15
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The case against Scott Peterson has been aired in the National Enquirer and it does not belong in any court room where Kangaroo Justice does not prevail.
Mark Geragos does not need a defense to make it clear that it is not plausible to legitimately convict a man who has been cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. The slanderous and spurious allegations which are now called "the evidence" have been published in detail, in the National Enquirer and if this disinformation is to be pawned off to an unsuspecting jury, they need to be informed. And so, if the trial against Scott Peterson is to be fair, the judge must instruct the jury accordingly; "Members of the jury, I am supplying you with 10 issues of the National Enquirer. The theories of nine of the issues have been rejected by the prosecution because they made you all laugh. The January 6, 2004 issue is indisputable because the National Enquirer published a picture of Merlin the tracking dog, and THAT is what you call INDISPUTABLE evidence. If, in your infinite wisdom, you determine that the National Enquirer is a credible source, you must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you think that the National Enquirer is not credible, then Investigators like David Sween gets the last word."
This case is clearly over as far as the guilt or the innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned.
The judge in the Laci Peterson murder trial was supposed to be Richard Arnason, a retired Contra Costa County judge who was choseny by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George. Arnason is a well known, criminal law expert with extensive death penalty case experience and having served on the Superior Court of Contra Costa County for 31 years, he would never tolerate the tactics of prosecutors who are pretending to have a case against Scott Peterson. Needless to say, the prosecutors had to shop around, to find a judge who was willing to listen to a case that would have been thrown out a long time ago, if a reasonable judge like Arnoson was not replaced.
Clearly, any Judge who determines that the National Enquirer had showed probable cause that Scott Peterson had killed 27-year-old Laci, who was nine months pregnant, and dumped her body in San Francisco Bay, needs his head examined.
I know what I am talking about. In my experience, reasonable and fair Judges are irresponsibly replaced when prosecutors understands the weakness of their case.
Michael Cardoza, a criminal defense attorney in the San Francisco Bay area, thought that both the prosecution and the defense would approve of Arnason and every legal expert was shocked to hear he had been replaced.
"He does what's right and he controls his courtroom," said Cardoza, who tried a case before Arnason in 1998.
If the prosecution had a case, they would have accepted Arnason. Instead, they made sure he was disqualified because they [try not to laugh] claimed that an experienced and distinguished judge was biased against them.
Mark Geragos is understandably frustrated and angered by the kangaroo court that the prosecutors are seeking to construct for the sake of lynching Scott Peterson. The prosecution selected judge is even refusing to sequester the jury, and in this case, a jury that is not sequestered is subject to the manipulation that the Skakel jury was subjected to, when demagogues like Dominick Dunne dined within earshot of the jurors that lynched Michael Skakel. Needless to say, this prosecution is seeking an equally creative way to manipulate the Peterson jury; is that why they opposed the request to sequester the jury?
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said jurors will be allowed to go home each night with an admonishment not to discuss the case, "and we'll see what happens." We'll see what happens, if this selected fool who is supposed to be a judge, continues to preside over a kangaroo court.
I repeat; The case against Scott Peterson is OVER, because Scott Peterson, the most investigated man in America, has been absolutely cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. In the alternative, you can promote the so called credibility of the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, because every other issue has prompted widespread laughter --and now, it's just a matter of time... before the media rejects the latest fraud.
712 Date: 2004-02-29 15:44:47
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
By Kim Curtis
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:22 a.m. February 26, 2004
REDWOOD CITY – Laci Peterson's trail ended at the water's edge.
It began as a scent path picked up by police dogs, leading from Scott and Laci Peterson's Modesto home down the road to nowhere.
According to testimony this week by the dogs' handlers, Laci Peterson's scent was again picked up at a nearby warehouse that Scott Peterson rented and on a boat he had stored inside – the same boat prosecutors say he used to ferry his wife's body out into the San Francisco Bay.
_______________________________
Wow, Associated Press read the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, and it publishes it as "the news" for February 26, 2004. LOL
711 Date: 2004-02-28 14:31:58
You Read it here first. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
There's no horse race, or, as some of you prefer to say "horse raise". John Kerry was the clear frontrunner, from start to finish. It's Kerry versus Bush !
709 Date: 2004-02-28 00:33:07
Alex Pintura ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
I read that exact story in the Modesto Bee yesterday [actually, February 26, 2004]. This is quite thedisgrace for the media, for the police and for the Modesto Bee reporters who have lost all credibility. Arrest should be based on evidence, not on the stories that the media picks up after the National Enquirer publishes bullshit.
708 Date: 2004-02-27 22:17:46
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Want to know where all the morons [the imbecillic prosecution] are getting their evidence from? Today, it's all in the mainstream media, including the retarded Modesto Bee, that is supporting John Edwards because the morons think they are powerful enough to manufacture a horse raise. Check it out for yourself, don't take my word for it.
________________________
National Enquirer
January 6, 2004
Heroic Tracking Dogs Prove Scott Lied to Police
by David Wright, Don Gentile & Charlie Montgomery
Three dogs that police used to search for Laci produced incredibly damning evidence against her husband Scott just days after she vanished.
Merlin, a bloodhound tracking dog that follows a person’s scent indicated Laci was taken from her home and then Scott’s warehouse in a vehicle.
Twist, a Labrador “cadaver dog” that searches for the scent of a dead body, picked up the scent of a body in Laci’s home and on a blue tarp Scott owned.
And Trimble, another Lab tracking dog, produced the most compelling evidence against Scott. He showed that Scott left his warehouse in his truck, headed for the Berkeley Marina, and the dog picked up Laci’s scent – at the marina!
"Trimble was brought to the area where Scott said he launched his boat to go fishing,"
"The dog grew excited. She pulled hard on the leash, taking her handler out to a pier where she stopped and stared out at the water. She then turned and looked into the eyes of her handler, indicating that Laci was out there somewhere. At that moment, detectives were convinced that Scott had sent his wife to a watery grave.
Scott was obviously worried about tracking dogs implicating him. Detective Al Brocchini testified at Scott's preliminary hearing that Laci's husband had asked him on Christmas Day, less than 24 hours after the search for her began, whether police were using cadaver dogs.
Brocchini was stunned. He told Scott cadaver dogs are used to search for bodies and he wasn't ready to say Laci was dead.
And the dogs' discoveries so unnerved Scott's lawyers, Mark Geragos and Kirk McAllister that they challenged the credentials of the dog handlers in an attempt to have the tracking evidence tossed out of court.
But the prosecution has no fears about the ability of Merlin, Twist and Trimble. The dogs and their handlers, Cindee Valentin and Eloise Anderson, are members of the prestigious California Resuce Dog Association (CARDA), the largest search dog group in the nation, which serves as a model for other search dog teams.
A pack of CARDA dogs joined Merlin, Twist and Trimble in the search for Laci. CARDA dogs have participated in over 2,000 searches in the past few decades, and have helped in such disasters as the Mexico City earthquake in 1985, the Northridge, CA earthquake and the Oklahoma City Bombing.
Merlin the bloodhound, guided by handler Cindee Valentin, was brought in two days after Laci disappeared. A sunglass case belonging to Laci was used to give the dog her scent as a search was conducted outside the Peterson home.
Merlin when nowhere near the park where Scott had said his wife went to walk their dog McKenzie. Instead the bloodhound made a beeline in the opposite direction following Laci’s scent for many blocks until his handler reeled him in.
Valentin said she’d learned enough to know that Laci was taken away from her home in a vehicle.
“The handler explained that the dog never sniffed sidewalks. It only followed Laci’s scent on a direct track right down the middle of streets.” Said the insider.
Valentin told detectives that a trained tracking dog following a scent down the middle of the street is a sure indication a person was in a vehicle.
Merlin was then brought to an area near Scott's warehouse Again the dog quickly picked up Laci's scent at an intersection and headed down the middle of streets until it wound up on Higyway 132-- a route on the way to the Berkeley Marina.
Merlin was finally taken to the door of the warehouse and again the bloodhound picked up Laci’s scent, following the trail out of the parking lot and on the same track down the middle of streets to the same spot on Highway 132.
“Detectives now knew Laci was taken from her home in a vehicle, then to the warehouse and then from the warehouse in a vehicle to Highway 132.” Said the insider.
The ENQUIRER learned that police believe Scott deliberately tried to confuse Merlin as the bloodhound was used to search along Highway 132.
“Scott was driving Laci’s Land Rover,” said the insider. “He had just come from his lawyer’s office and and he tried to drive past police officers on Highway 132 who were helping direct traffic away from the search area. “He was told he had to go a different way. Scott never identified himself to the cops or thanked them for helping in the search.
“But he was being followed at the time by surveillance teams who watched him stop and put of a search flyer on a pole that was in from of the location where the search was being conducted.
Detectives were convinced Scott was using Laci’s Land Rover to confuse the dog by introducing Laci’s scent in the area of the search. His lawyers could later say that’s the reason Laci’s scent was detected.”
Twist, the cadaver dog, and her handler Eloise Anderson were brought into the case to find out if the dog picked up the scent of a dead body. Inside the Peterson home, the dog showed interest in a spot on the carpet in the family room.
“Detectives felt this could be the spot where Scott wrapped up Laci’s body before removing it from the home,” the insider disclosed.
Outside the Peterson home, in a backyard shed, Twist came to a full alert at a blue tarp Scott had placed over a lawn mower. It was the same tarp Det. Brochini had found in the back of Scott’s truck the night he reported Laci missing
Back in the house again, Twist gave another indication a body had been in the family room.
At the warehouse, Twist was confused by chemical smells – but not as much as has been previously reported. “By Scott’s boat, the dog gave an indication a body had been inside,” said the insider.
“The dog also gave a stronger indication by three milk crates up against a wall in the warehouse. One crate had a large roll of shrink-wrap inside it. Detectives felt some of it was used to wrap around Laci's body.”
The next day, tracking dog Trimble was brought to the Berkley Marina. After sniffing at Laci’s sunglass case, the dog picked up a scent at an entrance to the
launch area where Scott said he put his boat in the water to go fishing.
“Trimble tugged hard on the harness, taking her handler to the westernmost pier at the launch area,” said the insider. “The dog continued along the pier, stopping at one pylon.
“That’s where the dog stared out at the water. The dog was indicating the end of the trail.”
Trimble was also shown a bedroom slipper belonging to Scott.
On Jan 4, 2003, the dog was placed in three different locations near Highway 132. And each time, Trimble picked up Scott's scent and wound up heading west on the highway -- on the route toward the Berkeley Marina.
________________________________
Now you know exactly how the cops manufacture evidence and coach witnesses, when they need to convict an innocent man. First and foremost, Laci's sunglasses had Scott Peterson's scent all over them because HE is the one who found them, but that is just one of about 50 thousand points that the NE fails to mention. In the whole, this isn't contaminated evidence. It is absolutely fabricated, as one would expect, from the National Enquirer.
I just love the part where Scott deliberately tried to mislead Merlin LOL. This is SICK !
If you want to know the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson, just listen to what David Sween has said, otherwise, you can rely on the imbecilles who are promoting ALL the crap that the Globe and National Enquirer publishes.
707 Date: 2004-02-25 22:14:00
Joe Sneider ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The dog handler evidence is explosive, it has made Scott Peterson and Vivian Mitchell stand out. The only potentially damaging "evidence" is in the category of "mild interest", and that smacks of a handler who wants to turn up something, even though the dog is not alerting.
706 Date: 2004-02-25 21:47:52
Tom Wilkinson ( tom5515@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote:
Modesto police detective Al Brocchini called off a search even though a bloodhound named Merlin appeared to be following Laci Peterson’s scent, the dog’s handler testified Tuesday. That is very strange. This lapse has made it clear that the police had no interest to verify or to dispute Scott's claim that Laci was walking her dog in the park, and that is a consistent lapse. Is it any wonder that the police did not follow up, on Vivian Mitchell's claim that Laci was walking her dog? These lapses are not, by any stretch of the imagination, excusable, and they make the prosecutor's dog handlers testimony, relatively useless, except for the fact that this testimony exposes an incompetent investigation.
705 Date: 2004-02-25 21:13:24
Jeremy Russell ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
It was getting late on Dec. 26, 2002 - two days after a pregnant Laci Peterson was reported missing.
“In spite of the fact a missing woman is out there whose scent is out there, Brocchini made the decision not to track it?” defense attorney Pat Harris asked.
“Yes,” said Cindee Valentin, a volunteer dog handler with the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Department.
Valentin maintained that the her assessment that Laci Peteson left in a vehicle was accurate.
“Looking at the entire trail,” Harris asked, “Do you still think this was the scent of Laci Peterson in a vehicle?”
“Yes I do,” Valentin said.
But she said police never instructed her to have her dog search in East La Loma Park, where Scott Peterson told police his wife may have walked their dog.
Valentin also said it was her impression from talking to police on Dec. 26 they were looking at Scott Peterson and not trying to find his wife.
Sounds like the prosecutor's own witness proves that Laci was kidnapped and that Scott did not murder her, in their own home.
704 Date: 2004-02-25 14:06:59
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Not quite Tom. The "investigative developments" were well reported in the media. The police, Bill Garcia and Ava Frey were trying to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson, and when they failed to implicate Scott, they said "we are not going to disclose our investigative developments." The police obviously think they have a license to bury their failures. If they don't do that, they cannot justify the arrest of Scott Peterson.
woodjadoit
Unregistered User
(3/3/04 9:12 am) Reply
just amazing
It's really funny how the dimwits out there who think 'ole Scotty is innocent focus soley on the weakest evidence and then rant about bad press. Relax o brainless one, just like oj even though he did it, he''l probably get off.
rforsland
Unregistered User
(3/4/04 12:04 am) Reply
Defence stategies
If the defense is serious about winning this case, they need to show that there is an active conspiracy against Scott. It will take more than an innuendo-laced/conspiracy theory/gut-feeling explanation to do that..
First...assume that everything Scott has said is the absolute truth.
Second..assume that Law Enforcement was not actually involved in the murder, but had assumed from the get go that the husband was usually the guilty party in ransomless kidnappings cases such as these..and that they have always been interested in making Scott look guilty..to the point of lying..
Don't shoot the messenger..just playing Devil's Advocate here..
Scott claims that he told detectives about the affair with Amber on Dec 24th....
Standard operating procedure would dictate that they contact Amber to verify this...their motive for doing this would be increased if they already believed that Scott was guilty.. I can't possibly think of any reason that his story would not be checked out...
Of course..they deny it..as does Amber...
Time for some phone record checks...police vehicle sign out checks with mileage...if somebody contacted Amber..there will be a trail..or a witness..
To prove that the police are covering up and/or outright lying would put an end to all of this...
As in the OJ trial....Offense is better than defence..
rforsland
Unregistered User
(3/4/04 3:48 am) Reply
Gestation times
I have always wondered(and sort of laughed at) why people think that they can nail down the exact date that their child is going to be born....Not only is it hard to pinpoint the moment of conception (unless it was in vitro), the gestation period is not always exactly 9 months. My wife is a good case in point...we could narrow the conception down to a span of 3 or 4 days (ahhh..youth) and the Docs. thru calculation, sonograms, magic 8 ball would give us a date.
With both of my children, they made their appearance on their time. My daughter came at 8 mos 4 days (7 lbs 12oz)..My son came at 8 mos 2 days ( 9 lbs 10 oz).
Neither of them premature in any way...I even warned the OB that he had better keep his calender open cuz it may show up about a month sooner than he thought...
I wouldn't count on that evidence in this trial....
If it is true that Laci's body was found in her tan maternity pants, then the people that killed her must have dressed her in them.. Are they really the same pants ?? If not, how did the killers know the brand ?? If they are Laci's pants, then the abducters must have broken into Laci's house and taken them..either before or after the abduction...Its sounding more and more like the killer(s) knew Laci....
Now, what is the motive ?? somebody that is seeking revenge on Scott ?? Like a jilted mistress ?? Hard to believe that Laci had any enemies...And there had to be more than one person to execute a plan like this...they must have left a trail.....and while LE may be incompentent and capable of skewing the facts, I don't believe that they are behind Laci's murder...just convenient pawns..
So, the Defence needs to scrutinize anybody that would have a motive to see Scott suffer...I can't see random killers taking the risks that had to be taken to set this one up...
The killers of Chandra Levy were more than happy to let the body remain unfound...they didn't need to risk moving it to be near Condits location as described in his alibi
Professional killers, like those who killed Chandra and Laci
...keep the bodies until they are forensically useless. Why do you think tracking-dogs failed to find Chandra's decomposing body? It obviously wasn't there until the killers put it there. Aren't the MORONS smart ! LOL
717 Date: 2004-03-03 21:27:13
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Why does Judge Delucchi contradict himself? In his own words, "I'm persuaded the dog tracking in and around Modesto can't be corroborated'' said Delucchi. "You can't cross-examine the dog."
Delucchi, however, ruled that prosecutors will be able to present a separate piece of dog-tracking evidence that places Laci Peterson's scent at the very pier where her husband said he left for an afternoon of fishing on the day she went missing. The jury will hear testimony from an expert dog handler whose Labrador retriever Trimble followed Laci Peterson's scent from the parking lot of the Berkeley Marina to the edge of the pier.
Court precedent requires corroboration of any dog-tracking evidence, Delucchi said, and called the marina evidence admissible because Scott Peterson admitted going to the marina, and Laci Peterson and her fetus washed ashore 2 1/2 miles from the marina four months later. What does that have to do with the need to follow Laci's scent?
Where is the corroboration? Did anybody see Laci at the Marina? Is Judge Delucci going to cross-examine the dog? This judge does not make any sense. First and foremost, the crap that Delucci has chosen to call evidence is straight out of the National Enquirer, and this is the direct quote: "And Trimble, another Lab tracking dog, produced the most compelling evidence against Scott. He showed that Scott left his warehouse in his truck, headed for the Berkeley Marina, and the dog picked up Laci’s scent – at the marina!"
Is Judge Delucchi going to cross-examine the dog?
Moreover, Delucchi has selectively excluded dog tracking evidence because Modesto police detective Al Brocchini called off a search even though a bloodhound named Merlin appeared to be following Laci Peterson’s scent, and that is not justifiable.
Where is the corroboration? Who saw Laci at the marina? Eyewitnesses corroborated the fact that Scott was at the marina, alone. This is extremely bizarre and presumptuous corroboration -like denying Merlin the tracking dog, the opportunity to follow Laci Peterson's scent. Delucchi's peculiar obsession to dismiss the fact that nobody saw Laci at the marina, not to mention the fact that she was witnessed walking her dog on December 24th, clearly indicates that the so called, "corroborated" dog-tracking evidence is nothing more than the bizarre theory that the National Enquirer publicized. That is not even what you call evidence, let alone, corroborated evidence.
716 Date: 2004-03-03 03:35:51
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Judge rules that the "evidence" published in the National Enquirer on January 6, is admissable ! LOL
Dogs tracked Laci's scent to a boat she had never been on. Fascinating ! Sounds like dogs don't know the difference between Scott and Laci's property, since Scott had handled it. For those who don't know the diff, that's called contaminated evidence --but what else do you expect from the National Enquirer? You would think that a judge would know better.
715 Date: 2004-03-01 21:45:35
John Ashcroft's Justice Department is involved? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"They have report after report after report of investigations that were taking place in December," Geragos said. "These items are negative for my client. I've got pages upon pages of hair comparisons that exclude my client at every single point."
Prosecutor David Harris said they were working with the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigations to turn over the reports.
"We're doing the best we can," Harris told Delucchi. "We're going up the chain and saying you need to get this done."
714 Date: 2004-03-01 16:14:28
Joe Sneider ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Oh Fred, you are so gentle with your leading questions, don't beat around the bush ! These idiots are trying to suggest that Scott Peterson made cement anchors, used them to sink Laci, and he just left one behind so that the geniuses can trace it back to Scott. These MORONS are so stupid, it will be a huge shock if the entire jury does not die laughing before this is over.
713 Date: 2004-03-01 15:38:19
Fred Sanfilippo ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The bodies of Laci Peterson and the baby were simultaneously recovered in April along the shores of San Francisco Bay, not far from where Scott Peterson was reported fishing on the day his wife vanished - Christmas Eve, 2002.
Who is gullible enough to believe that Scott Peterson directed the opportunity to frame himself?
712 Date: 2004-02-29 18:08:15
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The case against Scott Peterson has been aired in the National Enquirer and it does not belong in any court room where Kangaroo Justice does not prevail.
Mark Geragos does not need a defense to make it clear that it is not plausible to legitimately convict a man who has been cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. The slanderous and spurious allegations which are now called "the evidence" have been published in detail, in the National Enquirer and if this disinformation is to be pawned off to an unsuspecting jury, they need to be informed. And so, if the trial against Scott Peterson is to be fair, the judge must instruct the jury accordingly; "Members of the jury, I am supplying you with 10 issues of the National Enquirer. The theories of nine of the issues have been rejected by the prosecution because they made you all laugh. The January 6, 2004 issue is indisputable because the National Enquirer published a picture of Merlin the tracking dog, and THAT is what you call INDISPUTABLE evidence. If, in your infinite wisdom, you determine that the National Enquirer is a credible source, you must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you think that the National Enquirer is not credible, then Investigators like David Sween gets the last word."
This case is clearly over as far as the guilt or the innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned.
The judge in the Laci Peterson murder trial was supposed to be Richard Arnason, a retired Contra Costa County judge who was choseny by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George. Arnason is a well known, criminal law expert with extensive death penalty case experience and having served on the Superior Court of Contra Costa County for 31 years, he would never tolerate the tactics of prosecutors who are pretending to have a case against Scott Peterson. Needless to say, the prosecutors had to shop around, to find a judge who was willing to listen to a case that would have been thrown out a long time ago, if a reasonable judge like Arnoson was not replaced.
Clearly, any Judge who determines that the National Enquirer had showed probable cause that Scott Peterson had killed 27-year-old Laci, who was nine months pregnant, and dumped her body in San Francisco Bay, needs his head examined.
I know what I am talking about. In my experience, reasonable and fair Judges are irresponsibly replaced when prosecutors understands the weakness of their case.
Michael Cardoza, a criminal defense attorney in the San Francisco Bay area, thought that both the prosecution and the defense would approve of Arnason and every legal expert was shocked to hear he had been replaced.
"He does what's right and he controls his courtroom," said Cardoza, who tried a case before Arnason in 1998.
If the prosecution had a case, they would have accepted Arnason. Instead, they made sure he was disqualified because they [try not to laugh] claimed that an experienced and distinguished judge was biased against them.
Mark Geragos is understandably frustrated and angered by the kangaroo court that the prosecutors are seeking to construct for the sake of lynching Scott Peterson. The prosecution selected judge is even refusing to sequester the jury, and in this case, a jury that is not sequestered is subject to the manipulation that the Skakel jury was subjected to, when demagogues like Dominick Dunne dined within earshot of the jurors that lynched Michael Skakel. Needless to say, this prosecution is seeking an equally creative way to manipulate the Peterson jury; is that why they opposed the request to sequester the jury?
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said jurors will be allowed to go home each night with an admonishment not to discuss the case, "and we'll see what happens." We'll see what happens, if this selected fool who is supposed to be a judge, continues to preside over a kangaroo court.
I repeat; The case against Scott Peterson is OVER, because Scott Peterson, the most investigated man in America, has been absolutely cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. In the alternative, you can promote the so called credibility of the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, because every other issue has prompted widespread laughter --and now, it's just a matter of time... before the media rejects the latest fraud.
711 Date: 2004-02-29 15:44:47
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
By Kim Curtis
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:22 a.m. February 26, 2004
REDWOOD CITY – Laci Peterson's trail ended at the water's edge.
It began as a scent path picked up by police dogs, leading from Scott and Laci Peterson's Modesto home down the road to nowhere.
According to testimony this week by the dogs' handlers, Laci Peterson's scent was again picked up at a nearby warehouse that Scott Peterson rented and on a boat he had stored inside – the same boat prosecutors say he used to ferry his wife's body out into the San Francisco Bay.
_______________________________
Wow, Associated Press read the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, and it publishes it as "the news" for February 26, 2004. LOL
710 Date: 2004-02-28 14:04:07
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
When did the National Enquirer become the medium for who goes to jail and who does not?
Does the judge in the Scott Peterson case read the National Enquirer? For those with a low IQ, this is not a trick question !
709 Date: 2004-02-27 22:17:46
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Want to know where all the morons [the imbecillic prosecution] are getting their evidence from? Today, it's all in the mainstream media, including the retarded Modesto Bee, that is supporting John Edwards because the morons think they are powerful enough to manufacture a horse raise. Check it out for yourself, don't take my word for it.
________________________
National Enquirer
January 6, 2004
Heroic Tracking Dogs Prove Scott Lied to Police
by David Wright, Don Gentile & Charlie Montgomery
Three dogs that police used to search for Laci produced incredibly damning evidence against her husband Scott just days after she vanished.
Merlin, a bloodhound tracking dog that follows a person’s scent indicated Laci was taken from her home and then Scott’s warehouse in a vehicle.
Twist, a Labrador “cadaver dog” that searches for the scent of a dead body, picked up the scent of a body in Laci’s home and on a blue tarp Scott owned.
And Trimble, another Lab tracking dog, produced the most compelling evidence against Scott. He showed that Scott left his warehouse in his truck, headed for the Berkeley Marina, and the dog picked up Laci’s scent – at the marina!
"Trimble was brought to the area where Scott said he launched his boat to go fishing,"
"The dog grew excited. She pulled hard on the leash, taking her handler out to a pier where she stopped and stared out at the water. She then turned and looked into the eyes of her handler, indicating that Laci was out there somewhere. At that moment, detectives were convinced that Scott had sent his wife to a watery grave.
Scott was obviously worried about tracking dogs implicating him. Detective Al Brocchini testified at Scott's preliminary hearing that Laci's husband had asked him on Christmas Day, less than 24 hours after the search for her began, whether police were using cadaver dogs.
Brocchini was stunned. He told Scott cadaver dogs are used to search for bodies and he wasn't ready to say Laci was dead.
And the dogs' discoveries so unnerved Scott's lawyers, Mark Geragos and Kirk McAllister that they challenged the credentials of the dog handlers in an attempt to have the tracking evidence tossed out of court.
But the prosecution has no fears about the ability of Merlin, Twist and Trimble. The dogs and their handlers, Cindee Valentin and Eloise Anderson, are members of the prestigious California Resuce Dog Association (CARDA), the largest search dog group in the nation, which serves as a model for other search dog teams.
A pack of CARDA dogs joined Merlin, Twist and Trimble in the search for Laci. CARDA dogs have participated in over 2,000 searches in the past few decades, and have helped in such disasters as the Mexico City earthquake in 1985, the Northridge, CA earthquake and the Oklahoma City Bombing.
Merlin the bloodhound, guided by handler Cindee Valentin, was brought in two days after Laci disappeared. A sunglass case belonging to Laci was used to give the dog her scent as a search was conducted outside the Peterson home.
Merlin when nowhere near the park where Scott had said his wife went to walk their dog McKenzie. Instead the bloodhound made a beeline in the opposite direction following Laci’s scent for many blocks until his handler reeled him in.
Valentin said she’d learned enough to know that Laci was taken away from her home in a vehicle.
“The handler explained that the dog never sniffed sidewalks. It only followed Laci’s scent on a direct track right down the middle of streets.” Said the insider.
Valentin told detectives that a trained tracking dog following a scent down the middle of the street is a sure indication a person was in a vehicle.
Merlin was then brought to an area near Scott's warehouse Again the dog quickly picked up Laci's scent at an intersection and headed down the middle of streets until it wound up on Higyway 132-- a route on the way to the Berkeley Marina.
Merlin was finally taken to the door of the warehouse and again the bloodhound picked up Laci’s scent, following the trail out of the parking lot and on the same track down the middle of streets to the same spot on Highway 132.
“Detectives now knew Laci was taken from her home in a vehicle, then to the warehouse and then from the warehouse in a vehicle to Highway 132.” Said the insider.
The ENQUIRER learned that police believe Scott deliberately tried to confuse Merlin as the bloodhound was used to search along Highway 132.
“Scott was driving Laci’s Land Rover,” said the insider. “He had just come from his lawyer’s office and and he tried to drive past police officers on Highway 132 who were helping direct traffic away from the search area. “He was told he had to go a different way. Scott never identified himself to the cops or thanked them for helping in the search.
“But he was being followed at the time by surveillance teams who watched him stop and put of a search flyer on a pole that was in from of the location where the search was being conducted.
Detectives were convinced Scott was using Laci’s Land Rover to confuse the dog by introducing Laci’s scent in the area of the search. His lawyers could later say that’s the reason Laci’s scent was detected.”
Twist, the cadaver dog, and her handler Eloise Anderson were brought into the case to find out if the dog picked up the scent of a dead body. Inside the Peterson home, the dog showed interest in a spot on the carpet in the family room.
“Detectives felt this could be the spot where Scott wrapped up Laci’s body before removing it from the home,” the insider disclosed.
Outside the Peterson home, in a backyard shed, Twist came to a full alert at a blue tarp Scott had placed over a lawn mower. It was the same tarp Det. Brochini had found in the back of Scott’s truck the night he reported Laci missing
Back in the house again, Twist gave another indication a body had been in the family room.
At the warehouse, Twist was confused by chemical smells – but not as much as has been previously reported. “By Scott’s boat, the dog gave an indication a body had been inside,” said the insider.
“The dog also gave a stronger indication by three milk crates up against a wall in the warehouse. One crate had a large roll of shrink-wrap inside it. Detectives felt some of it was used to wrap around Laci's body.”
The next day, tracking dog Trimble was brought to the Berkley Marina. After sniffing at Laci’s sunglass case, the dog picked up a scent at an entrance to the
launch area where Scott said he put his boat in the water to go fishing.
“Trimble tugged hard on the harness, taking her handler to the westernmost pier at the launch area,” said the insider. “The dog continued along the pier, stopping at one pylon.
“That’s where the dog stared out at the water. The dog was indicating the end of the trail.”
Trimble was also shown a bedroom slipper belonging to Scott.
On Jan 4, 2003, the dog was placed in three different locations near Highway 132. And each time, Trimble picked up Scott's scent and wound up heading west on the highway -- on the route toward the Berkeley Marina.
________________________________
Now you know exactly how the cops manufacture evidence and coach witnesses, when they need to convict an innocent man. First and foremost, Laci's sunglasses had Scott Peterson's scent all over them because HE is the one who found them, but that is just one of about 50 thousand points that the NE fails to mention. In the whole, this isn't contaminated evidence. It is absolutely fabricated, as one would expect, from the National Enquirer.
I just love the part where Scott deliberately tried to mislead Merlin LOL. This is SICK !
If you want to know the truth about the murder of Laci Peterson, just listen to what David Sween has said, otherwise, you can rely on the imbecilles who are promoting ALL the crap that the Globe and National Enquirer publishes.
708 Date: 2004-02-27 06:17:19
Kerry versus Bush ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Sween proves bodies were planted.
719 Date: 2004-03-07 16:26:11
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
As I have repeatedly indicated, Scott did not dump his wife in the Bay, her body was deliberately planted, to implicate Scott Peterson.
If Scott had in fact murdered Laci and dumped her in the Bay, sonar searches would have located the body.
Indeed, a sonar search just recovered a man from Idaho, who was just located at the bottom of Auke Bay.
Visibility is not a factor in Sonar searches because experts measure a reflection of sound and not light. The only reason that Laci was not located is because she was not there, and that is probably because she was buried in a shallow grave.
Speculation aside, sonar searches failed to recover the body, and that is because there was no body to recover. It was obviously planted to implicate Scott Peterson, and that is clearly what sonar searches have proved.
718 Date: 2004-03-06 05:08:47
Bruno Jasienski ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Do not fear your enemies. The worst they can do is kill you. Do not fear your friends. At worst, they may betray you. Fear those who do not care; they neither kill nor betray, but betrayal and murder exist because of their silent consent.
717 Date: 2004-03-03 21:27:13
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Why does Judge Delucchi contradict himself? In his own words, "I'm persuaded the dog tracking in and around Modesto can't be corroborated'' said Delucchi. "You can't cross-examine the dog."
Delucchi, however, ruled that prosecutors will be able to present a separate piece of dog-tracking evidence that places Laci Peterson's scent at the very pier where her husband said he left for an afternoon of fishing on the day she went missing. The
jury will hear testimony from an expert dog handler whose Labrador retriever Trimble followed Laci Peterson's scent from the parking lot of the Berkeley Marina to the edge of the pier.
Court precedent requires corroboration of any dog-tracking evidence, Delucchi said, and called the marina evidence admissible because Scott Peterson admitted going to the marina, and Laci Peterson and her fetus washed ashore 2 1/2 miles from the marina four months later. What does that have to do with the need to follow Laci's scent?
Where is the corroboration? Did anybody see Laci at the Marina? Is Judge Delucci going to cross-examine the dog? This judge does not make any sense. First and foremost, the crap that Delucci has chosen to call evidence is straight out of the National Enquirer, and this is the direct quote: "And Trimble, another Lab tracking dog, produced the most compelling evidence against Scott. He showed that Scott left his warehouse in his truck, headed for the Berkeley Marina, and the dog picked up Laci’s scent – at the marina!"
Is Judge Delucchi going to cross-examine the dog?
Moreover, Delucchi has selectively excluded dog tracking evidence because Modesto police detective Al Brocchini called off a search even though a bloodhound named Merlin appeared to be following Laci Peterson’s scent, and that is not justifiable.
Where is the corroboration? Who saw Laci at the marina? Eyewitnesses corroborated the fact that Scott was at the marina, alone. This is extremely bizarre and presumptuous corroboration -like denying Merlin the tracking dog, the opportunity to follow Laci Peterson's scent. Delucchi's peculiar obsession to dismiss the fact that nobody saw Laci at the marina, not to mention the fact that she was witnessed walking her dog on December 24th, clearly indicates that the so called, "corroborated" dog-tracking evidence is nothing more than the bizarre theory that the National Enquirer publicized. That is not even what you call evidence, let alone, corroborated evidence.
716 Date: 2004-03-03 03:35:51
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Judge rules that the "evidence" published in the National Enquirer on January 6, is admissable ! LOL
Dogs tracked Laci's scent to a boat she had never been on. Fascinating ! Sounds like dogs don't know the difference between Scott and Laci's property, since Scott had handled it. For those who don't know the diff, that's called contaminated evidence --but what else do you expect from the National Enquirer? You would think that a judge would know better.
715 Date: 2004-03-01 21:45:35
John Ashcroft's Justice Department is involved? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
"They have report after report after report of investigations that were taking place in December," Geragos said. "These items are negative for my client. I've got pages upon pages of hair comparisons that exclude my client at every single point."
Prosecutor David Harris said they were working with the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigations to turn over the reports.
"We're doing the best we can," Harris told Delucchi. "We're going up the chain and saying you need to get this done."
714 Date: 2004-03-01 16:14:28
Joe Sneider ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
Oh Fred, you are so gentle with your leading questions, don't beat around the bush ! These idiots are trying to suggest that Scott Peterson made cement anchors, used them to sink Laci, and he just left one behind so that the geniuses can trace it back to Scott. These MORONS are so stupid, it will be a huge shock if the entire jury does not die laughing before this is over.
713 Date: 2004-03-01 15:38:19
Fred Sanfilippo ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The bodies of Laci Peterson and the baby were simultaneously recovered in April along the shores of San Francisco Bay, not far from where Scott Peterson was reported fishing on the day his wife vanished - Christmas Eve, 2002.
Who is gullible enough to believe that Scott Peterson directed the opportunity to frame himself?
712 Date: 2004-02-29 18:08:15
David Sween ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
The case against Scott Peterson has been aired in the National Enquirer and it does not belong in any court room where Kangaroo Justice does not prevail.
Mark Geragos does not need a defense to make it clear that it is not plausible to legitimately convict a man who has been cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. The slanderous and spurious allegations which are now called "the evidence" have been published in detail, in the National Enquirer and if this disinformation is to be pawned off to an unsuspecting jury, they need to be informed. And so, if the trial against Scott Peterson is to be fair, the judge must instruct the jury accordingly; "Members of the jury, I am supplying you with 10 issues of the National Enquirer. The theories of nine of the issues have been rejected by the prosecution because they made you all laugh. The January 6, 2004 issue is indisputable because the National Enquirer published a picture of Merlin the tracking dog, and THAT is what you call INDISPUTABLE evidence. If, in your infinite wisdom, you determine that the National Enquirer is a credible source, you must find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you think that the National Enquirer is not credible, then Investigators like David Sween gets the last word."
This case is clearly over as far as the guilt or the innocence of Scott Peterson is concerned.
The judge in the Laci Peterson murder trial was supposed to be Richard Arnason, a retired Contra Costa County judge who was choseny by California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George. Arnason is a well known, criminal law expert with extensive death penalty case experience and having served on the Superior Court of Contra Costa County for 31 years, he would never tolerate the tactics of prosecutors who are pretending to have a case against Scott Peterson. Needless to say, the prosecutors had to shop around, to find a judge who was willing to listen to a case that would have been thrown out a long time ago, if a reasonable judge like Arnoson was not replaced.
Clearly, any Judge who determines that the National Enquirer had showed probable cause that Scott Peterson had killed 27-year-old Laci, who was nine months pregnant, and dumped her body in San Francisco Bay, needs his head examined.
I know what I am talking about. In my experience, reasonable and fair Judges are irresponsibly replaced when prosecutors understands the weakness of their case.
Michael Cardoza, a criminal defense attorney in the San Francisco Bay area, thought that both the prosecution and the defense would approve of Arnason and every legal expert was shocked to hear he had been replaced.
"He does what's right and he controls his courtroom," said Cardoza, who tried a case before Arnason in 1998.
If the prosecution had a case, they would have accepted Arnason. Instead, they made sure he was disqualified because they [try not to laugh] claimed that an experienced and distinguished judge was biased against them.
Mark Geragos is understandably frustrated and angered by the kangaroo court that the prosecutors are seeking to construct for the sake of lynching Scott Peterson. The prosecution selected judge is even refusing to sequester the jury, and in this case, a jury that is not sequestered is subject to the manipulation that the Skakel jury was subjected to, when demagogues like Dominick Dunne dined within earshot of the jurors that lynched Michael Skakel. Needless to say, this prosecution is seeking an equally creative way to manipulate the Peterson jury; is that why they opposed the request to sequester the jury?
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi said jurors will be allowed to go home each night with an admonishment not to discuss the case, "and we'll see what happens." We'll see what happens, if this selected fool who is supposed to be a judge, continues to preside over a kangaroo court.
I repeat; The case against Scott Peterson is OVER, because Scott Peterson, the most investigated man in America, has been absolutely cleared by 24/7 scrutiny. In the alternative, you can promote the so called credibility of the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, because every other issue has prompted widespread laughter --and now, it's just a matter of time... before the media rejects the latest fraud.
711 Date: 2004-02-29 15:44:47
Jake Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
By Kim Curtis
ASSOCIATED PRESS
12:22 a.m. February 26, 2004
REDWOOD CITY – Laci Peterson's trail ended at the water's edge.
It began as a scent path picked up by police dogs, leading from Scott and Laci Peterson's Modesto home down the road to nowhere.
According to testimony this week by the dogs' handlers, Laci Peterson's scent was again picked up at a nearby warehouse that Scott Peterson rented and on a boat he had stored inside – the same boat prosecutors say he used to ferry his wife's body out into the San Francisco Bay.
_______________________________
Wow, Associated Press read the January 6, 2004 issue of the National Enquirer, and it publishes it as "the news" for February 26, 2004. LOL
710 Date: 2004-02-28 14:04:07
Mike ( no email / no homepage) wrote:
When did the National Enquirer become the medium for who goes to jail and who does not?
Does the judge in the Scott Peterson case read the National Enquirer? For those with a low IQ, this is not a trick question !
SCOTT'S INNOCENT!!
And DON'T BACK DOWN!! NO MATTER WHAT!! MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD!! SUPPORT SCOTT IF YOU TRULY FEEL HE IS INNOCENT!! 
I'm glad to see Mr. Peterson kept his cool, though; he is an amazing father and a good man. But what Jim Brazelton made him do - get up there on the stand to testify against his own son in a death penalty trial - is just beyond cruel and sickening. 
They are like this - 
. Pure evil. 
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies