HE IS NOT SICK! and he is not a bastard!! i love michael jackson and if you dont then dont be posting crap like that! you are sick!
tightboy
Unregistered User
(11/20/03 4:51 am) Reply
Michael's love
I love Michael Jackson and he loved me once in a dark room when I was 2.
chicagoggirl
Unregistered User
(11/21/03 6:38 am) Reply
sick bastard
This guy has a major problem..... He doesnt like his looks so he changes them.. has he forgotten he's a male now also? You don't go messing with little boys!!!!! You need to rethink your loyalties.... This is one sick dude.!!
chicagoggirl
Unregistered User
(11/21/03 6:40 am) Reply
sick bastard I can't believe you would stand up for someone as sick as he is.......
This man likes to dangle babies out of high rises? Oh yeah he can be your idol.....
I'd look elsewhere..
Wake up!!!!
xxxcrowthyxxx
Unregistered User
(11/21/03 1:43 pm) Reply
grrrrrrr
ok guys yea it is a bit weird for a man to sleep in the same room as little boys. and it was his mistake to show off his baby. but not an any extent is he a looney, crazy, pedofile ectect. i feel that if you realy hate him that much you should find something else to do with your self than rite crap on message boards made for FANS! have you never herd of the sayin " innocent untill proven guilty"? i feel you should all leave him alone and give him the change to proove he is innocent! i believe he is innocent. LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!!
sick bastard
i hope the sick pedophile rots in prison
Realist
Unregistered User
(11/21/03 6:43 pm) Reply
sick bastard
some people are sick, but some are just evil. evil michael loves all the little boys
Peta File
Unregistered User
(11/21/03 10:27 pm) Reply
III & Brujeria
How can anybody with half a brain thinks this douchebag is great. He,s a total fag!!!. PS He slept with that child. By the way if he loves all kids so much, why is it always boys he's sleeping (wink,wink) with.
xxxcrowthyxxx
Unregistered User
(11/23/03 12:48 pm) Reply
wot the hell!!1
rite no offence to all you non fans but if you realy h8 michael jackson that much y are you spending your time on this site made for michael jackson fans???
Re: sick bastard
I am not a big Micheal Jackson fan but I would like to know why a mother would allow her son to go to his home and spend the night after knowing what had gone on several years before with the first child sex charge ? Then why did they only file a civil suite instead of a criminal suite ? Sounds like all that mother wants is money. It must be nice to have a son and use him for your own gain.
concerned
Unregistered User
(11/24/03 11:23 am) Reply
sick bastard
people people lets not forget that in this country you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. A lot of people are passing judgement on this man without knowing the facts. All we know is what the media shovels down our throats. Let the man have is day in court.
WHACKOJACKO
Unregistered User
(11/25/03 12:38 pm) Reply
DNA TESTS FOR HIS "CHILDREN"
Is it not a crime to "buy" another human being. Let's face it, Whacko Jacko is not only a homo-sexual pedophile, but he is very likely guilty of breaking several adoption laws as well. His kids don't even look melado -- they are white as snow. They should be DNA tested to prove otherwise. In the case of his 1st two kids, he was married to their mother so he probobly gets away with a loophole -- but for the baby he almost dropped out a window....... he never met the mother -- and so if he is not the DNA father of this kid - and if he did not legally adopt the kid -- then he BOUGHT the KID!!! THAT IS ILLEGAL!!!
wakeuppeople
Unregistered User
(11/26/03 3:28 pm) Reply
He needs help
I am a musician that was a fan of MJ for years until he started to show signs that he is troubled psychologically. The plastic surgery, the construction of Neverland and subsequent sleep overs with kids, etc. If Michael was not a celebrity and just your average Joe, they would be gettin him psychological help for his own well being. But because he is rich and famous, his behavior pattern is largely ignored. Even Michael is in denial of his own behavior because he doesn't know any better. I don't think we should hate him, I think he should be pittied. Let's face it, no childhood, forced into show business by an overbearing and money driven father, not allowed to grow up like every other person, followed and harassed at every step by the media, taught to think that he is only second to God Himself and the ability to buy virtually anything he has a whim for regardless of price. This is not normal and I would like to see anyone go through the same childhood and come out without the desire to mutilate your face (because he doesn't like himself or being a person of african american desent) and act like a child of 8 at the age of 40 something. One of these days, he is going to get caught doing something he shouldn't be doing, will be convicted and will be sentenced to get psychological treatment. If you are a real fan of MJ, then you need to get the message out to him to get help. It is obvious to anyone that the man is not a happy person and probably never has been.
lissette
Unregistered User
(11/29/03 12:22 am) Reply
micheal is innocent
DID IT EVER OCCUR TO ANYONE THAT THE LAWYER OF THIS "MOLESTED" BOY IS THE SAME LAWYER THAT RECEIVED AT LEAST 5 MILLION $ IN PAYMENT FOR THE LAST TIME ANOTHER BOYS PARENTS RECEIVED A $25 MILLION SETTLEMENT???? (10 YRS AGO I THINK)
PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY ARE SO CONSUMED WITH MONEY AND SUEING PEOPLE TO GET MORE MONEY THAT ITS SO EASY TO GO AFTER CELEBRITIES! LOOK AT KOBE, HE SEXED THAT GIRL,BUT DIDNT RAPE HER. NOW THAT BITCH IS TRYING TO GET SOME CASH FROM HIS CHEATING ASS BY SAYING HE RAPED HER!
MICHAEL SINGS SONGS ABOUT HELPING KIDS AROUND THE WORLD, HE TRIES TO MAKE KIDS HAPPY BY BUILDING A ZOO SO THEY CAN PLAY, HE HAS ROLLERCOASTER RIDES FOR THEM, LIKE A KIDS DREAMWORLD! MICHEAL ISNT SICK, HE'S AN ECCENTRIC MAN WITH PERSONAL PHYSICAL ISSUES BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN HE'S A PSYCHO PEDOPHILE. I AM NOT "BLIND", AND NOT IN DENIAL. I READ BETWEEN THE LINES. THE LAST CASE WHERE IT WAS DROPPED BECAUSE THE BOY "REFUSED" TO TESTIFY IS B.S. COURTS HAVE CLOSED CASES SUCCESSFULLY W/OUT VICTIM'S TESTIMONY BEFORE. IF THE PARENTS WERE TRUTHFUL AND WANTED TO MAKE A MAN PAY FOR "HURTING" THEIR CHILD, THEY WOULDNT BE HAPPY WITH A LOAD A CASH THAT MAKES THEIR LIVES OH SO MUCH EASIER. MICHAEL MAINTAINS HIS INNOCENT AND FOR THOSE OF US THAT AREN'T CAUGHT UP IN RUMORS ENTERTAINED BY LIES STAND BEHIND HIM.
DECEMBER 9--A confidential investigation by Los Angeles police and child welfare officials concluded earlier this year that allegations Michael Jackson sexually abused a cancer-stricken boy were "unfounded," according to an internal government memo obtained by The Smoking Gun.
The probe's findings were based, in large part, on interviews with the alleged victim, his two siblings, and the boy's mother. According to the memo, when the child was questioned in February by a social worker assigned to the Sensitive Case Unit of L.A.'s Department of Children & Family Services (DCFS), he "denied any form of sexual abuse" by Jackson and said that he never "slept in the same bed as the entertainer." While not specifically named in the DCFS memo, the 45-year-old Jackson is referred to repeatedly as "the entertainer."
The memo notes that the boy, now 14, and his 12-year-old brother--who also denied sexual abuse--expressed "a fondness for the entertainer and stated they enjoyed visiting his home, where they would often ride in the park, play video games, and watch movies." The pair's sister, now 17, told a social worker that she accompanied the boys on "sleepovers at the entertainers home," but had "never seen anything sexually inappropriate between her brothers and the entertainer."
The children's mother told investigators that Jackson was "like a father to the children and a part of her family." While acknowledging that her son "has slept in the same room as the entertainer," the woman claimed "they did not share a bed. The entertainer would sleep on the floor," according to the November 26 memo.
The joint probe by DCFS and the Los Angeles Police Department ran from February 14-27 and, the memo states, the "investigation by the Sensitive Case Unit concluded the allegations of neglect and sexual abuse to be unfounded both by the LAPD-Wilshire Division and the Department."
When an investigation is closed, child welfare officials can summarize their findings in one of three ways. If evidence is found to support abuse charges, the case is marked "substantiated." A case is termed "not substantiated" when evidence discovered is not sufficient to support allegations (though the charges may, in fact, be true). Finally, a matter is branded "unfounded" when officials determine there is no merit to the allegations.
As with many DCFS investigations, the Jackson abuse case began with a call to the agency's child abuse hotline. According to the memo, a "Child Abuse Referral" was phoned in on February 14 by a "school official" from the Los Angeles Unified School District, which oversees the city's sprawling public school system. Citing the prior week's ABC broadcast of "Living with Michael Jackson," the controversial Martin Bashir documentary, the school official lodged allegations of "general neglect by mother and sexual abuse by 'an entertainer,'" according to the summary memo. The school official identified both the cancer patient, then 13, and his younger brother as the "referred children."
While the school official is not further identified in the DCFS memo, published reports have indicated that the older boy was taunted by classmates after the documentary aired on ABC's "20/20" newsmagazine. During the February 6 program, the child was seen holding hands with Jackson and resting his head against the singer's shoulder. Jackson told Bashir that he had slept with many children unrelated to him, but insisted, "It's not sexual, we're going to sleep. I tuck them in...It's very charming, it's very sweet."
In a clear reference to fallout from the Bashir documentary, the boy's mother told investigators that "she believed the media had taken everything out of context," according to the memo, which summarizes the DCFS child abuse investigation. The "sensitive case" memo was prepared at the direction of Dr. Charles Sophy, a high-ranking DCFS official who joined the department in late-March, a month after the Jackson probe was completed. The memo was authored by Jennifer Hottenroth, a DCFS assistant regional administrator. In a brief telephone interview yesterday morning, Hottenroth declined to speak about her memo, saying, "I can't talk about it...I can refer you to our public affairs person. I can't comment on any of this." Sophy (pictured at right) did not return a message left with his assistant. Louise Grasmehr, a DCFS spokesperson, said that while she had been given a copy of the document by Hottenroth Monday morning, "We cannot comment on anything that is stated in the memo. Because it's all protected under confidentiality laws in California."
The boy's February 2003 interview with child abuse investigators--not to mention those with his family--appears to run counter to allegations he later made to law enforcement officials in Santa Barbara, where Jackson was arrested November 20 and released on $3 million bail. District Attorney Thomas Sneddon has said that he expects to file felony child molestation charges against Jackson next week. In addition to the boy's original denial of sexual abuse by Jackson, his younger brother's February 2003 statements also appear to contradict recent published reports claiming that the child has told Santa Barbara investigators that he witnessed his brother being molested by the star.
While it is unclear what, if any, effect the LAPD-DCFS investigation will have on a future Jackson prosecution, the performer's defense team will surely seize on the February 2003 probe's findings to question the current veracity and motives of the child and his family--and, of course, further muddy a case that already promises to be a difficult prosecution.
The child abuse investigation was immediately placed with the Sensitive Case Unit since department guidelines dictate that if "one of the clients in the referral is a public figure" or if the case's allegations "would be certain to generate media interest if they became known outside of DCFS," the matter requires utmost secrecy.
As with most DCFS abuse cases, a children's social worker (CSW) was dispatched to interview the boys, as was a LAPD investigator (the memo does not indicate whether the cop and the social worker conducted their interviews in tandem). In either case, it is likely that the children were questioned apart from their mother, since the abuse referral included allegations of neglect on the woman's part, according to a DCFS source familiar with agency operations.
The allegations examined this year in the LAPD-DCFS probe mirror sex abuse claims that surfaced in 1993, when a 13-year-old California boy claimed that the pop star molested him. Jackson, who was not charged in that case, reportedly made a multimillion dollar payment to settle a civil suit brought by the child and his family. Click Hereto read the boy's sworn declaration describing Jackson's alleged abuse.
This is the confidential Department of Children & Family Services memorandum detailing the Los Angeles child welfare agency's February 2003 investigation into sexual abuse allegations against Michael Jackson. The Smoking Gun has blurred the names of the children involved in the probe, which ended with a finding that the charges were "unfounded."
"Mind your own business about the way I raise my children. I don't need your advice." MJ
Wacko Jacko is out of whacko
Unregistered User
(12/19/03 2:38 pm) Reply
Ummm, yeah
Anyone who thinks this is a civil suit (tulate??????) needs to get their facts straight.
FACT: There is NO civil suit. These are CRIMINAL charges brought by the district attorney of Santa Barbara County.
FACT: NOT ONE news story has claimed that the kid's family is suing MJ for money, demanding money, asking for money, accepting money, or otherwise involved with money.
FACT: The kid who was bought off by Jacko 10 years ago sued him for money and then declined to testify in any criminal proceedings after being paid off. THIS KID has said he WILL testify in the trial.
If you still want to believe the weirdo is innocent, that's your problem. At least get your frigging facts straight.
Re: Ummm, yeah
What I'd like to know is, why the hell are you MJ-bashing types hanging around on MJ message boards when you don't like him? What can you possibly get out of it?
As many people have said before me, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. There is as yet no actual evidence, and the act of charging is a precaution. Until there's something CONCRETE, you guys who have nothing better to do than go around slagging off MJ and upsetting his fans, do not have a leg to stand on.
your a sick bastard
michael is better lookin than u so shut your mouth u sad @#%$ now piss off this website.michael is more of a man than you will ever be i cant believe you can waste your time to say nasty things about my man your life must be so borring you prick
I can't believe you would stand up for someone as sick as he is....... 
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies